This is part of what Galloway was talking about in his neocon-bashing rebuttal of the attempt to charge him of profiteering in the oil-for-food scandal. How lovely it would be to have the whole criminal cartel actually be held accountable for their massive crimes.
It always comes back to power and greed with these guys. There is no upper limit to what they grasp for and no lower limit to the sickening crimes they will commit to get it. The level of hypocrisy is truly stunning.
LET'S FRY THEIR MURDEROUS, LYING, CHEATING BUTTS!!! The truth of what they have done must be exposed.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=639335How the oil-for-food programme was exploited
By Rupert Cornwell
18 May 2005
The riveting confrontation yesterday between George Galloway and the Congressional panel probing the scandal of the United Nations oil-for-food programme for Iraq proves one thing - that few emerge with any credit in the maelstrom left by Saddam Hussein's elaborate scheme to smuggle oil, enrich himself and grease the palms of potential allies abroad and at the UN.
Over the last five days, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations has issued three reports on the scandal, showing how Saddam reaped over $10bn manipulating Iraq's oil sales for the seven years it operated, between 1996 and 2003.
(snip)
In sheer terms of money however, the third report, issued by the Democratic minority on the Committee alone, is even more shocking. It alleges that the US government turned a blind eye as Bayoil, a Texas oil company, imported Iraqi oil and paid $37m of kickbacks to the Saddam regime. Also, as a member of the Security Council, Washington did nothing to prevent Saddam selling oil worth a claimed $8bn, to Jordan, Syria, Egypt and Turkey, in violation of sanctions.
(snip)
The US government not only did not try to stop the shipments, Mr Levin's report said. "It appears to have facilitated them," despite widespread recognition that they were "a blatant violation" of sanctions, and an alert from the UN itself in mid-2001 that Bayoil could be abusing the oil-for-food programme.
(snip)
There is a great deal more in this article and I recommend reading all of it.
Another aspect of the Bayoil scandals, reported in the
Houston Chronicle, is discussed in this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1478823Thread title: “Democrats tie BayOil to Iraq's purchase of bombs”