Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Republican Definition of Bipartisanship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AUYellowDog Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 08:04 PM
Original message
The Republican Definition of Bipartisanship
Is it just me or does the Republican definition of bipartisanship seem to be "Become a republican or be labeled as partisan."

Brandon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's pretty much it.
Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bipartisanship = monopartisanship.
War is peace.
Up is down.
Black is white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Slight modification: become a puke or be labeled "unamerican", "traitor",
etc. (maybe "French")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some more defintions I've learned recently:
Republicans believe Filibusters are bad, except when they do it.
Republicans believe all judicial nominees deserve an up and down vote, except then a Democrat President does the nominating.
Republicans believe anonymous sources are bad, unless the anonymous source provides information they like.
Republicans believe in a free press, as long as the "free press" publishes things they condone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. We found out when Trent Lott was majority leader
that it only takes one Democrat to officially make something bipartisan. Everytime they had Zell Miller's vote, they said the issue had bipartisan support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They should just have 3 or 4 members switch to minor parties
That way they can say that their legislation has "multiparty" support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. didn't a notorious republican describe it as "date rape"?
Seems to be accurate, judging from their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC