Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"It's a good start" white house says-regarding retraction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:29 PM
Original message
"It's a good start" white house says-regarding retraction
Why the FUCK are we letting them get away with this?

We now have the White House firing journalists for reporting the truth?

HOW. DARE. THEY.

They have no GD right to require that Newsweek fire people (for reporting the truth about the Administration's war crimes).

Why in the hell is Newsweek caving?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. So what do they want next?
The firstborn of every Newsweek employee? Pints of blood from those employees to keep Cheney and Rummy from going poof when the sunlight hits them? Halo pictures of * throughout infinity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. A good start?
Must be nice to have such an inflated sense of righteousness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Please post a link regarding
firings and related "requirements" from the White House. It sounds like a good read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm just as pissed off as you
My mind is racing.. What can we do? Vote them out? Nope, tried that already.

Our country is in 100% Soviet censorship mode now. They don't even try to hide it any more. It's scary as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Will the Bush Junta demand retractions from other sources?
"Detainees also complained about the interference with their ability to pray and the lack of respect given to their religion. For example, the British detainees state that they were never given prayer mats and initially were not provided Korans. They also complained that when the Korans were provided, the guards “would kick the Koran, throw it into the toilet and generally disrespect it.”

http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/usa/gitmo1004/3.htm#_ft...

The Junta and their lackey media have managed to twist this their way and make NW the scapegoat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is what NW gets for publishing the truth.
It will not be tolerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. How many dead because Bush went to war on "bad information"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. But Bu$hco got 'darn good intelligence'. Medals of Freedom were issued
because of this. They even conrtadict themselves within their OWN retarded reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. newsweak caves because
they're mainstream media, which means they're corporate whores in the final analysis; and being corporate whores they have no self-respect. Much vanity, yes--but no self-respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ain't That Too Fucking Bad!
Shit, I'm getting madder by the second. I gotta get a grip here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just as CBS execs went to the WH to beg for forgiveness and
vowed a more sevile demeanor, and just as they were de-balled, so now is Newsweek. Its all bullshit by master bullshit artists.

MSNBC joins in much like Fox to boot.

Meanwhile TREASON and mass murder are being committed by the WH.
Raiding whats left of the treasury and hiding it should be a breeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. blast the media - let them hear us - that we will stand up for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelAgainstEmpire Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sounds about right
"Why the FUCK are we letting them get away with this?"

We aren't. But we don't count.

Could always call someone in Congress. But that's pretty much a waste of time.

Could always write an angry letter. But then you're just some socialist anti-Americanist tree hugging consumer.

These are many of the same people from the Iran-Contra days. They got away with that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. WHEN WILL BUSH RETRACT THESE LIES ?
Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. In such quantities, these chemical agents could also kill untold thousands. He's not accounted for these materials. He has given no evidence that he has destroyed them.

U.S. intelligence indicates that Saddam Hussein had upwards of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents. Inspectors recently turned up 16 of them, despite Iraq's recent declaration denying their existence. Saddam Hussein has not accounted for the remaining 29,984 of these prohibited munitions. He has given no evidence that he has destroyed them.

From three Iraqi defectors we know that Iraq, in the late 1990s, had several mobile biological weapons labs. These are designed to produce germ warfare agents and can be moved from place to a place to evade inspectors. Saddam Hussein has not disclosed these facilities. He has given no evidence that he has destroyed them.

The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in the 1990s that Saddam Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, had a design for a nuclear weapon and was working on five different methods of enriching uranium for a bomb.

The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.

Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production.


--George W. Bush, 2003 State of the Union Address
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. "hostile information"
Who needs a free press when God is on your side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC