Haven't sent it yet....wanted some input. THKS
-------
Dear Senator McCain:
I am writing in response to your comments regarding the leaked British memo which alleges that President Bush conspired (too strong a word?) to get British cooperation for his planned war on Iraq. I do so with a sense of outrage that you would insult the average American’s intelligence by stating, “… I do not believe that the Bush administration decided that they would set up a scenario that gave us the rationale for going into Iraq."
Most of us were there, Senator McCain, when the President started up the war drums. I personally doubted that any justification existed for this war, aside from the Administration’s own agenda. I listened to the explanations being made at the time and drew the conclusion that they were “trumped up” charges. The one bit of “evidence” that did give me pause was Colin Powell’s testimony to the UN – but my confidence in that was shaken once I observed how the war was conducted.
For a war conducted in search of WMD would place the highest priority on securing the sites containing explosives. To allow people to loot and destroy would simply not be smart military strategy. And we have in our military the best and the brightest – do you not agree? Furthermore, a war that liberated a people would not require American troops to pull down a hated dictator’s statue while a small crowd of spectators looks on. (I’d rather expect to see mobs of people taking it down themselves while our troops looked on in amazement.)
I would prefer that I could place my confidence in the “Leader of the Free World” – so I take no pleasure in having seen one after another of the President’s allegations shown to be based on distorted and faked intelligence. But to stand today and claim that the President
did not set up the scenario is dishonest of you, if you possess the intellect that I expect you do. It may be politically expedient. But it is dishonest and you ought to be ashamed – if you have the moral fiber that I believe you do.
I happened to be in Great Britain in June, 2003. I read with some interest the articles coming out in the British press about the “sexed up” intelligence behind the war, and saw firsthand the anger of a people who knew they’d been lied to. Prime Minister Blair has had a lot of explaining to do with the British people with regard to this war.
But the British people were not traumatized by the events of 9-11 like Americans have been. And they have had the luxury of a free and open press that brought out a healthy debate over facts and allegations such that they could make informed judgments about their government’s activities.
This is in stark contrast to the homogenized “on message” coverage of events that has been the mainstay of American media. And thanks to an overblown sense of “patriotism” that has been rampant since 9-11, all logical debate about the war (indeed, about the government) has been cast aside in favor of unquestioning support. So the President and his Administration have gotten away with lying to the American people, to the Congress of the United States, and to the world.
You have clearly thrown in your lot to support and continue this deception. I am disappointed and ashamed.