Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney's Shadow Govt. Gets Another Free Pass!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dxstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:31 PM
Original message
Cheney's Shadow Govt. Gets Another Free Pass!!!
U.S. court dismisses Cheney energy task force case

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/energy_cheney_dc

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday threw out a lawsuit that sought details about Vice President Dick Cheney's 2001 energy policy task force that critics say secretly formed policy favorable to the industry.

Sierra Club environmental group and the watchdog group Judicial Watch that sought to learn about contacts between task force members and industry executives.

"We hold that plaintiffs have failed to establish any duty, let alone a clear and indisputable duty, owed to them by the federal government" under the law in question, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Judge A. Raymond Randolph wrote in the 13-page ruling.

All eight judges on the appeals court sided with the Bush administration and agreed the lawsuit must be dismissed.

-------------

It never ends, man... it just never ends...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dxstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kicking myself...
...purely out of frustration...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can anyone say "stacked deck"? And they want more judges of this type..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dxstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Fargin' A!
Can I get a recommendation or two here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dxstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No?... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes.
"Yes" being more positive than "no."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dxstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Thank you, H20 Man!
"They who thirst shall be refreshed..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Damn "activist" judges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pssst, Mr. Judge A. Raymond Randolph.... http://www.enronmovie.com...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. VERY distressing news.
Back to SCOTUS,...I hope. This one just cannot be lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Appeals in federal courts
are based on process, not the actual content. He's covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC