|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-08-05 01:16 AM Original message |
Is the IRS going to take away that Baptist church's tax exempt status? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-08-05 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
1. excellent question! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-08-05 05:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Trying to get this up for the morning crowd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burrowowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-08-05 01:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. Not under Bu$hCo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bklyncowgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-08-05 06:05 AM Response to Original message |
4. This should be the poster child for non-profits staying out of politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formernaderite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-08-05 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
5. I think all religions should have their tax exempt status revoked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sundancekid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-08-05 08:58 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. ginning up is bad enough BUT to exclude and deny membership due |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-08-05 11:45 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Deleted message |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-08-05 11:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. It didn't violate constitutional rights but it DID violate tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-08-05 01:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Check out the rules they are breaking regarding their privileged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-08-05 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. Of course not. If this were Liberal Dem's you know they would take it away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC