|
I don't know about you but I'm not in any hurry to go toe to toe with a state trooper or national guardsman. Flocking in among a huge numbers of "rabble rouser's" to voice my dissent seems passe, and quite unhealthy. Chaining myself to a tree only to have someone swab tear gas in my eyes seems equally pointless and equally less desirable. No matter how successful mass protest was 30 years ago, we have different weapons at our disposal now and it's time we started exploring alternative ways of using these techniques to our advantage.
In the past, mass protest was essential because it served two major purposes. The first was exposure for the cause. A large crowd of 10, 20, 50, 100 thousand people brought media exposure and ultimately sent a message to the people in charge that this group was serious about an issue. The second purpose was for people to gain information about the issue. The "Internets" weren't around 30 years ago. Information spread at the speed of the mail and telephone calls. The amount of information was limited by expenditures of time and money. Imagine trying to research 9/11 without instant access to millions of pages of information. Imagine not being able to simply click a button and pull up HR 235 and actually read the proposed bill the second you decide you want to. Imagine not having instant access to audio/video/pictures/news stories/quotes anything and everything we now enjoy. The age of mass protest was essential for the Vietnam Era but I am not so sure it is necessary now.
Today, we have better means at our disposal to actually effect change on our government. There's no need to travel hundreds of miles across the country to stand in protest. Our leaders don't care if we do and the press won't waste time reporting it anyway so the first purpose of a mass protest is defeated before it begins. The second purpose of information sharing is satisfied by the Internet thanks to the DU and Google. So how do we use the Internet and the other weapons in our arsenal to achieve our goals?
Instead of organizing a mass protest where people from all over the country drive to a location and carry misspelled signs, I think could have a telephone protest. How effective would it be if a Senator received 10, 20, 50 or 100 thousand phone calls on the same day, all stating the same thing? Prior to January 6th, when we wanted a Senator to stand up in protest against accepting the Ohio electoral votes, we essentially shut down Washington with our phone calls. This campaign was a success because we actually got what we asked for. We asked for 1 Senator to stand up and that's what we got, Barbara Boxer. We wanted 100 but we asked for 1. We succeeded in challenging the election and empowering one of our greatest Senators. What's more, not one person got hit by a riot baton or sprayed with pepper spray. Not one person was injured or arrested. The protest in New York at the RNC Rally only resulted in 19,000 arrests. In spite of how great it must have felt to be a part of that protest, what did it accomplish?
In stead of trying to organize a mass protest, why don't we start utilizing the things we all have at our disposal to start turning the tide against these tyrants? We could get 1,000 people to make 20 phone calls. We could get 2,000 people to post 5 signs along the highway. We can print out stickers on our printers and stick them on the mirrors in restrooms. The reason our military can't win in Iraq is because the enemy refuses to congregate in one area. We can't fight our military or our police forces and frankly, I don't want to. These people are citizens of this country and they shouldn't be placed into that position. I love and support our troops and our police. In spite of some of the Jackboot mentality they have, I don't want to see anyone fighting them on the streets. These aren't the people were pissed at. Let's start using our heads a bit and come up with a new way to protest that is truly non-violent.
Please use this topic to suggest alternative means of protest that are reasonable, efficient, result-oriented and non-violent. Let's prove that we are indeed as smart as we think we are.
|