Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Andrew Card blames Clinton for North Korean nuke presence on MTP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:27 AM
Original message
Andrew Card blames Clinton for North Korean nuke presence on MTP
The lying scumbag actually has the balls to blame Clinton for Bush's absolute failure at dealing with North Korea, Timmy didn't call him on it...

Transcript to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. of course he did ... Bush is responsible for no bad things and ...
all good things.

Card is a lying, shameless punk. I hope it burns him when he pees. I hope it burns so bad he screams in agony, pulling huge handfuls of his helmet hair out, dribbling a tiny squirt crossing his lying eyes with absolute pain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Tell us how you really feel!
That would be a cool animaiton.

:nuke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. I blame him and his fuckstick buddies for 9/11
There now...even?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. LOL
"fuckstick buddies"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. If you can believe it, I actually toned down my initial reply
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PittLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah ... the whole show was aggravating.
I was somewhat surprised at Tim's aggressiveness, I thought he did a decent job. Card is a parrot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. maybe its george washingtons fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mich Otter Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Clinton must still be President ....
since all the blame goes to the man at the top. The more these Republicans blame Clinton, the more I realize what we are missing in America; a leader who could do the job.
Bush is such a worthless P.O.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNguyenMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. jeez, not like half a decade isn't enough time for Bush to deal with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. Timeline of Bush's policy with North Korea
Edited on Sun May-01-05 11:00 AM by zulchzulu
2002 January - US President George W Bush says North Korea is part of an "axis of evil", along with states such as Iraq and Iran. Pyongyang says Mr Bush has not stopped far short of declaring war.

2002 October-December - Nuclear tensions mount. In October the US says North Korea has admitted to having a secret weapons programme. The US decides to halt oil shipments to Pyongyang. In December North Korea begins to reactivate its Yongbyon reactor. International inspectors are thrown out.

2003 January - North Korea withdraws from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), a key international agreement aimed at preventing the spread of atomic weapons.

2003 April - Delegations from North Korea, the US and China begin talks in Beijing on North Korea's nuclear ambitions, the first such discussions since the start of the nuclear crisis.

2003 July - Pyongyang claims that it has produced enough plutonium to start making nuclear bombs.

2003 August - Six-nation talks in Beijing on North Korea's nuclear programme fail to bridge gap between Washington and Pyongyang.

2003 October - Pyongyang says it has finished reprocessing 8,000 nuclear fuel rods, obtaining enough material to make up to six nuclear bombs.

2004 June - Third round of six-nation talks on nuclear crisis ends inconclusively. North Korea pulls out of scheduled September round.

2005 February - North Korea says it is suspending talks over its nuclear programme indefinately, citing the US administration's "intention to antagonise" the country.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/country_profiles/1132268.stm

More:

US intelligence concluded several years ago that North Korea had already developed a two-stage or three-stage missile that could strike the US. But the country has yet to flight-test such a missile. Determining whether North Korea has managed to make a nuclear warhead for a missile poses even greater difficulties for analysts than assessing whether its stage-two Taepo Dong 2 missile can fly.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/Kims-Nbombs-could-reach-US-says-spy-chief/2005/04/29/1114635747862.html?oneclick=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catt03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Of course Bolton didn't help
much by calling Kim "such human scum and bloodsucker is not entitled to take part in the talks."

And that Bush called Korea one of the "axis of evil" doers.

May be true on both statements, but maybe a little diplomacy and appropriate timing would help.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. Card still blaming Clinton - how pathetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Remember, Dubya can do no wrong
he can't think of one mistake he's made. So it couldn't be his fault...it just...couldn't :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. clinton left office
over 4 years and three months ago.

That dog won't hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
15. Clinton made progress w/ NK; Bush screwed the pooch
against the advice of Bush Sr. NK had suspended its nuclear program under Clinton, then restarted it under W. I find it hard to believe Russert wouldn't call card on that one--what a whore. W said, in public, that he "loathes" Kim Jong Il. W has refuesed--against all logic--to engage in direct talks with NK. W is apparently getting advice on NK policy from Rev. Moon (the Messiah), who is, of course, an ardent anti-communist.

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/east/03/09/japan.asia.bush/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. Understand, Fat Tim is a beltway whore
Beltway whores blame EVERYTHING on Clinton. Fat Tim didn't call Card on his blaming Clinton because to Fat Tim, it is gospel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC