Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So what do you think of *'s "Field of Dreams" energy plan....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 04:41 PM
Original message
So what do you think of *'s "Field of Dreams" energy plan....
"build refineries and the oil will come." What kind of yutzes come up with these plans? Oh, Halliburton, I forgot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cut out the middle man. Just build more gas stations!
Then competition between them would start price wars and the price of gas would plummet.

Or import camels to Death Valley. Everyone knows where there are camels there's bound to be oil.

This is "cargo cult" mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Or just leave the cap off your tank and let Jesus fill it. Love the
cargo cult bit!

Do you think that the competition would mean that they might bring back the guys that checked your oil, washed your windows and gave you gifts like bars of soap for stopping there? I'm all for that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbartch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. ONE thing I am excited about......ETHANOL !!! Hubby is going to
make ETHANOL for our own use. We are going to get a special stil and manufacture it. We will get GOOD Tax credits too. If we can sell the machine to other people.....perhaps we can get $$$ being a distributor!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. US Refinery capacity shortage *is* a major bottleneck problem
But I really doubt the military base idea will go anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AValdoux Donating Member (738 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unclear about a few things
Will the US Govt own the refineries?

Are we giving the land to the oil refinery companies?

Will the government pay for any of the cost? using tax credits?

The answers don't matter it still doesn't make sense. What about conservation like they did in WWII? They are so in oil's pocket no one has the courage to say "People, conserve for your country"


AValdoux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. the" military base" thing gives the oil companies;
free land and probably puts them out of the control of EPA...makes prefect sense....try a little conservation, they can't make money on that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oil companies are not stupid. They are also PLENTY greedy.
If they could increase the velocity of money coming in (i.e. profits) by building refineries, they would make the capital investment.

IOW, there must be a reason that more refineries are NOT worth building. My guess is that the bottleneck is the oilfields (pumping the oil up out of the ground), either currently or very soon. In the short-term they could refine and get more product to market, but with peak oil immanent, additional refining capacity will only be worthwhile for a few years (if at all) and not for enough years to recoup the investment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Unless the taxpayers pay for the refineries
Then, I'm sure they'd love to have them.

BTW, I think we actually passed peak oil just this year. I read that the market expects to come up a few hundred thousand barrels short of demand in 2006 (for the first time). I can't find any link on this quickly (still looking), but I think read it about 4 or 5 months ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Bingo. The only thing I heard remotely connected to energy
conservation is some sort of tax credit for new generation diesels. They will probably be Hummers with an extra room on the back for the in-laws (or hookers).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Hookers ! you're not dragging Jeff Gannon into the oil crisis are you?
Edited on Wed Apr-27-05 07:37 PM by SpiralHawk
I think the Republicans have suffered quite enough in-u-end-O about the gay male prostitute who got 'into' the White House 196 times over the last 2 years. I really wish you hadn't reminded us all of Jeff Gannon and the maleprostitute scandal, even though I'm sure it does somehow have something to do (lubrication?) with the oil pickle (so to speak) that Bush and the kinky-prostitute-shielding that Republicans have fomented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. I kept thinking that if the farmer builds a corn crib
and the crop fails there still isn't enough corn to feed the hungry. This may answer the immediate problem of storage space but it does not answer the problem of peak oil. No matter how the repugs try to ignore it we are going to have to talk about other sources of energy. The bushies are counting on the rapture so that leaves only us to confront the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. But if that same farmer clears out some corn and builds a
baseball diamond all sorts of cool shit happens. This is a faith-based plan, don't clutter it with reality. It makes the people who are losing military bases happy because they are now getting refineries, which of course don't pollute or smell. Plus, the refinery workers won't get drunk on passes or try to screw the local girls (at least in theory).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. My pal from Exxon says the oil co's haven't built more refineries 'cuz
new ones have to comply with lots of annoying regulations, while old ones are grandfathered in, pollution-wise, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. The REAL REASON they haven't built them ...
Have you not ever noticed how often the oil megoloplies cite refinery maintainence and mistakes in switching from heating oil to gasoline as reasons for spiking the price at the pump when there is no other reason? Note, too, the comensurate spike in their profits.

Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. same rehashed shit they've been saying since Kenny Boy and Little ...
Dick Cheney holed up together and produced the reach around for the energy business they demurely called their Energy Plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. building refineries on old military bases....
Amazing... Yeah, I imagine the oil business (one and the same as the BFEE) would love that handout. Could they be any more obvious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC