Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

H.R. 501: Rep. Slaughter (D-NY) has introduced fairness in media act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:00 PM
Original message
H.R. 501: Rep. Slaughter (D-NY) has introduced fairness in media act
Edited on Wed Apr-27-05 01:21 PM by paineinthearse
Just heard on daily WH press conference, Rep. Louise Slaughter has introduced a bill (designated as H.R 501) to restore the fairness in the media act (which was nullified by Reagan).

developing...............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Christ Almighty, its about time someone did this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Good luck
Good luck. I doubt it would change. *sigh* There's only two places in the news for democrats to go to. Keith Olbermann and Jon Stewart. Pretty pathetic while the republicans have thousands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Since the media has a "liberal bias" Republicans should be 100% in favor
I wonder why I suspect they'll not support this bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Really
They know the truth. I wonder what will happen. If they don't sign the bill then people will know there's no such thing as a liberal media in this country. If they do sign the bill they lose their hold on the media. Hmm. What will they do. Popcorn? :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. good pushing point
the assholes are always crying liberal media. How could they not want this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you, Rep. Slaughter!!!
This is SOOO long overdue. Surely you want to put some "balance" into that nasty liberal media, dontcha you Repubs? How could you possibly oppose a Fairness Doctrine demanding that news outlets expressing an opinion carry an opposing opinion too? This should kill the "liberal media" myth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Didn't Supreme Court kill it? And then Reagan killed its reintroduction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. No, it never got INTO the courts
Reagan enlisted the help of two of his most crooked legal pals, Scalia and Bork, to find a way that it could be overturned through the courts. The Supremes ruled several times that the doctrine was NOT unconstitutional, although their rulings became more hostile to it during the 1980s.

"n 1987 a bill to place the Fairness Doctrine into federal law passed the House by 3 to 1, and the Senate by nearly 2 to 1, but it was vetoed by President Ronald Reagan. Among those voting for the bill were Rep. Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) and Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.). In 1989 the Fairness Doctrine easily passed the House again, but didn't proceed further as President George Bush threatened to veto it. In 1991, hearings were again held on the doctrine, but President Bush's ongoing veto threat stymied passage."

http://www.twf.org/News/Y1997/Fairness.html

I will never forgive Clinton for not trying to get it reinstated during his first two years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. H.R 501- Fairness and Accountability in Broadcasting Act
Edited on Wed Apr-27-05 01:18 PM by paineinthearse
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/query

HR 501 IH


109th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 501
To enforce the public interest obligations of broadcast station licensees to their local communities.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 1, 2005
Ms. SLAUGHTER (for herself, Mr. HOLT, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. FILNER, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. OWENS, Ms. WATSON, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. WOOLSEY, and Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A BILL
To enforce the public interest obligations of broadcast station licensees to their local communities.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Fairness and Accountability in Broadcasting Act'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:

(1) The Communications Act of 1934 requires the Federal Communications Commission and broadcast licensees to promote the `public interest,' a phrase that appears 40 times in the legislation.

(2) Because broadcasters receive free licenses to use the public's airwaves, estimated to be worth hundreds of billions of dollars, they have an obligation to uphold the public's interest, and to adequately inform the public about news and opinion.

(3) From 1949 to 1987, a policy of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) required that radio and television stations air all sides of important or controversial issues, and give equal time to all candidates.

(4) Since the rescission of the Fairness Doctrine, the country has experienced a proliferation of highly partisan networks, news outlets, and ownership groups that disseminate unbalanced news coverage and broadcast content.

(5) News consumers, particularly those of talk radio, are overwhelmingly exposed to a single point of view. A 2004 survey by Democracy Radio revealed that 90 percent of all broadcast hours on talk radio are characterized as conservative. This imbalance results in issues of public importance receiving little or no attention, while others are presented in a manner not conducive to the listeners' receiving the facts and range of opinions necessary to make informed decisions.

(6) The 2004 survey, done by Democracy Radio, found that there were 2,349 hours of local conservative programs broadcast every week versus 555 hours of local progressive programs, and 39,382 hours of national conservative programs broadcast every week versus 2,487 hours of national progressive programs.

(7) An April 2004 poll, conducted by Media Matters for America of likely voters shows overwhelming support across the political and demographic spectrum for restoring rules requiring fairness and balance on the public's airwaves. When asked whether television and radio stations that use the public's airwaves should be required to present the sides of an issue in a reasonably balanced way including giving time to opposing points of view.

(8) Democracy is built on the concept that the views, beliefs, and values of an informed citizenry provide the best basis for political decision-making.

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC INTEREST STANDARDS.

Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

`(l) Implementation of Public Interest Standard-

`(1) PURPOSE- The purposes of this subsection are--

`(A) to restore fairness in broadcasting;

`(B) to ensure that broadcasters meet their public interest obligations;

`(C) to promote diversity, localism, and competition in American media; and

`(D) to ensure that all radio and television broadcasters--

`(i) are accountable to the local communities they are licensed to serve;

`(ii) offer diverse views on issues of public importance, including local issues; and

`(iii) provide regular opportunities for meaningful public dialogue among listeners, viewers, station personnel, and licensees.

`(2) STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC INTEREST DETERMINATIONS- The Commission may not issue or renew any license for a broadcasting station based upon a finding that the issuance or renewal serves the public interest, convenience, and necessity unless such station is in compliance with the requirements of this subsection.

`(3) COVERAGE OF ISSUES OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE- Each broadcast station licensee shall, consistent with the purposes of this subsection, cover issues of importance to their local communities in a fair manner, taking into account the diverse interests and viewpoints in the local community.

`(4) HEARINGS ON NEEDS AND INTERESTS OF THE COMMUNITY- Each broadcast station licensee shall hold two public hearings each year in its community of license during the term of each license to ascertain the needs and interests of the communities they are licensed to serve. One hearing shall take place two months prior to the date of application for license issuance or renewal. The licensee shall, on a timely basis, place transcripts of these hearings in the station's public file, make such transcripts available via the Internet or other electronic means, and submit such transcripts to the Commission as a part of any license renewal application. All interested individuals shall be afforded the opportunity to participate in such hearings.

`(5) DOCUMENTATION OF ISSUE COVERAGE- Each broadcast station licensee shall document and report in writing, on a biannual basis, to the Commission, the programming that is broadcast to cover the issues of public importance ascertained by the licensee under paragraph (3) or otherwise, and on how such coverage reflects the diverse interests and viewpoints in the local community of such station. Such documents shall also be placed, on a timely basis, in the station's public file and made available via the Internet or other electronic means.

`(6) CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE-

`(A) PETITIONS TO DENY- Any interested person may file a petition to deny a license renewal on the grounds of--

`(i) the applicant's failure to afford reasonable opportunities for presentation of opposing points of view on issues of public importance in its overall programming, or the applicant's non-compliance with the Commission's programming rules and policies relating to news staging and sponsorship identification;

`(ii) the failure to hold hearings as required by paragraph (3);

`(iii) the failure to ascertain the needs and interests of the community; or

`(iv) the failure to document and report on the manner in which fairness and diversity have been addressed in local programming.

`(B) COMMISSION REVIEW- Any petition to deny filed under subparagraph (A) shall be reviewed by the Commission. If the Commission finds that the petition provides prima facie evidence of a violation, the Commission shall conduct a hearing in the local community of license to further investigate the charges prior to renewing the license that is the subject of such petition.

`(C) OTHER REMEDIES- Nothing in this subsection shall preclude the Commission from imposing on a station licensee any other sanction available under this Act or in law for a failure to comply with the requirements of this subsection.

`(7) ANNUAL REPORT- The Commission shall report annually to the Congress on petitions to deny received under this subsection, and on the Commission's decisions regarding those petitions.'.

SEC. 3. TERM OF LICENSE.

(a) Amendment- Section 307(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 307(c)(1)) is amended by striking `8 years' each place it appears and inserting `4 years'.

(b) Effective Date- The amendment made by subsection (a) shall be effective with respect to any license granted by the Federal Communications Commission after the date of enactment of this Act.
END
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Status - burried in House Committee on Energy and Commerce
H.R.501
Title: To enforce the public interest obligations of broadcast station licensees to their local communities.
Sponsor: Rep Slaughter, Louise McIntosh (introduced 2/1/2005) Cosponsors (12)
Latest Major Action: 2/1/2005 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

============================

House Committee on Energy and Commerce - http://energycommerce.house.gov/

Members - scan the list. If your Rep is a member, especially a rethug, get them to move it.

Rethugs:
Joe Barton, Texas, Chairman
Ralph M. Hall, Texas
Michael Bilirakis, Florida, Vice Chairman
Fred Upton, Michigan
Cliff Stearns, Florida
Paul E. Gillmor, Ohio
Nathan Deal, Georgia
Ed Whitfield, Kentucky
Charlie Norwood, Georgia
Barbara Cubin, Wyoming
John Shimkus, Illinois
Heather Wilson, New Mexico
John B. Shadegg, Arizona
Charles "Chip" Pickering, Mississippi, Vice Chairman
Vito Fossella, New York
Roy Blunt, Missouri
Steve Buyer, Indiana
George Radanovich, California
Charles F. Bass, New Hampshire
Joseph R. Pitts, Pennsylvania
Mary Bono, California
Greg Walden, Oregon
Lee Terry, Nebraska
Mike Ferguson, New Jersey
Mike Rogers, Michigan
C.L. "Butch" Otter, Idaho
Sue Myrick, North Carolina
John Sullivan, Oklahoma
Tim Murphy, Pennsylvania
Michael Burgess, Texas
Marsha Blackburn, Tennessee

Democrats:

John D. Dingell, Michigan, Ranking Member
Henry A. Waxman, California
Edward J. Markey, Massachusetts
Rick Boucher, Virginia
Edolphus Towns, New York
Frank Pallone Jr., New Jersey
Sherrod Brown, Ohio
Bart Gordon, Tennessee
Bobby L. Rush, Illinois
Anna G. Eshoo, California
Bart Stupak, Michigan
Eliot L. Engel, New York
Albert R. Wynn, Maryland
Gene Green, Texas
Ted Strickland, Ohio
Diana DeGette, Colorado
Lois Capps, California
Mike Doyle, Pennsylvania
Tom Allen, Maine
Jim Davis, Florida
Jan Schakowsky, Illinois
Hilda L. Solis, California
Charles A. Gonzalez, Texas
Jay Inslee, Washington
Tammy Baldwin, Wisconsin
Mike Ross, Arkansas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bring back the Fairness Act!!
Yesssss!! Rep. Slaughter, I salute you...

NGU. :patriot:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskysright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Go SLAUGHTER: THANK HER for continuing to investigate Gannon-Gucker....
along with John conyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC