Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"They Also Admit to Wearing Democratic Underwear" (Denver 3)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 06:51 AM
Original message
"They Also Admit to Wearing Democratic Underwear" (Denver 3)
Surprising developments on Denver 3 case
by kos
Thu Apr 21st, 2005 at 20:28:31 PDT

I got word that the Secret Service has opened a criminal investigation into the fools involved in kicking out three people from one of Bush's sham social security "town hall meetings".
The security officials who kicked out the three acted and were dressed like secret service officers, and there's reason to believe they passed themselves off as such. That's a crime.

The big question -- who trained these security people, and all early fingers point to the White House. For the story to date, this column is a good summary.
Karen Bauer, Alex Young and Leslie Weise were removed from the event because they dared to arrive in a car with a bumper sticker that said, "No More Blood for Oil." They also admit to wearing Democratic underwear.

The identity of the bouncer, dressed to look like a Secret Service agent, has remained a stubborn secret despite demands from congressmen, senators and lawyers for the three ejected audience members.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/4/21/232831/611

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is Democratic underwear boxers or briefs?
Just want to make sure I'm in accordance with society's conventions...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's got to be briefs, please tell me it's briefs....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nah, briefs are too uptight :) It's gotta be Boxers both because
they let you be more free and hey, Boxer's one of us :) :) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh good God, I meant BOXERS
I am disgusted with myself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Considering that Dems want more freedom, ReThugs more rules
and constrictions on everyone's personal issues...I'd put the boxers (hey Barbara!) on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC