Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek's Samuelson: Deferring hard choices on retirement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:45 AM
Original message
Newsweek's Samuelson: Deferring hard choices on retirement
ROBERT J. SAMUELSON NEWSWEEK

Deferring hard choices on retirement

April 6, 2005

The great danger of an aging society is that the rising costs of government retirement programs – mainly Social Security and Medicare – increase taxes or budget deficits so much that they reduce economic growth. This could trigger an economic and political death spiral.

Our commitments to pay retirement benefits grow while our capacity to meet them shrinks. Workers and retirees battle over a relatively fixed economic pie. The debate we're not having is how to avoid this dismal future. President Bush's vague Social Security proposal, including "personal accounts," sidesteps the critical issues. His noisiest critics are equally silent.

Just recently, the trustees of Social Security and Medicare issued their annual reports on the programs' futures. Here's one startling fact that emerges from a close examination of the reports: by 2030, the projected costs of Social Security and Medicare could easily consume – via higher taxes – a third of workers' future wage and salary increases. We're mortgaging workers' future pay gains for baby boomers' retirement benefits.

(snip)


Because the dangers are so obvious, we ought to be minimizing them now. We ought to redefine the generational compact to lighten – somewhat – the burden of an aging population on workers. The needed steps are clear: to acknowledge longer life expectancies by slowly raising eligibility ages for Social Security and Medicare; to limit future spending by curbing retirement benefits for the better-off; to keep people in the productive economy longer by encouraging jobs that mix "work" and "retirement."

All advanced societies face a similar problem: how to support more retirees with (relatively) fewer workers. But we won't engage it. Let someone else make the hard choices, years from now when they will be much tougher.


Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050406/news_lz1e6samuelsn.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC