Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WOW! DU, TWOSPARKLES, GANNON ON DES MOINES PAPER!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:20 PM
Original message
WOW! DU, TWOSPARKLES, GANNON ON DES MOINES PAPER!!!!
"The Gannon-Gosch conspiracy theory first appeared on the message board of a liberal political site called The Democratic Underground on Feb. 26. A site regular, using the name TwoSparkles, speculated that Jeff Gannon was victimized by a government-organized child pornography ring."



http://edit.desmoinesregister.gannettonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artikkel?NoCache=1&Dato=20050405&Kategori=LIFE04&Lopenr=504050376&Ref=AR

Who's he Johnny Gosch?

By ERIN CRAWFORD
REGISTER STAFF WRITER
April 5, 2005

Johnny Gosch may finally have been found, thanks to Rush Limbaugh.

The Iowa paperboy was kidnapped in 1982, with unsubstantiated stories emerging later from his mother that he was abducted into a child pedophilia ring. No trace of him has ever been found, and no suspects have been arrested.

Nearly 23 years later, White House correspondent Jeff Gannon, who wrote for a conservative Web site, was exposed in February as James D. Guckert, a man with no journalism experience and links to several gay escort addresses online.

If you have the time to read a few hundred Web postings, you will see how Johnny Gosch and Jeff Gannon, two completely unrelated individuals, became the same person on the Web. The way the theory developed says much about the anything-goes nature of the blogosphere and self-proclaimed reporters on the Internet, who seem to find accuracy and proof a nuisance in uncovering fantastical conspiracies.

It took the random efforts of scores of Web loggers (bloggers), credulous readers and longtime followers of the case to assign the two men a bizarre, shared backstory involving satanic CIA agents, pedophiles and presidents. And, of course, Limbaugh.

Gosch's mother, Noreen Gosch, called the theory "quite bizarre," but not impossible.

"We don't have anything conclusive," she said.

With so many people contributing twists, this dark fiction is as wild as anything on daytime television. It is really only the most recent speculation about what happened to Johnny Gosch, who has been "sighted" numerous times in the last 20 years in Africa, across the country and even in a Montreal subway. Police have been unable to confirm the sightings.

But here's how the Internet can feed a rumor until a bunch of people actually believe it.

The Gannon-Gosch conspiracy theory first appeared on the message board of a liberal political site called The Democratic Underground on Feb. 26. A site regular, using the name TwoSparkles, speculated that Jeff Gannon was victimized by a government-organized child pornography ring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a shocker...Gannon is 48???
Sure doesn't look it. Especially in the male-prostitute photos ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Somewhat amazing that ...
from hundreds of posters commenting on Gannon/Guckert that one is picked out. Someone must have read hundreds of posts to cull that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But seriously...that age thing is a mindblower.
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 05:01 PM by tasteblind
48? He barely looks 35.

The reporter seems to have been sent out to discredit internet criticism of the government.

The pushy attitude may make more people question what's going on there.

Journalists need to get off their high horses...Jayson Blair can make it all up, and Dan Rather had his planted documents.

They followed the Bush Administration's phony WMD charges all the way to Iraq.

They are every bit as unreliable as the blogging community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. keep those stories coming folks. looks like folks read our stuff.
and find merit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. On the other thread she said her hubby was upset with her
for bringing it up. But we support you, TwoSparkles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. this isn't a blog though, it's a message board. as such, people are able
to discuss anything they want even if it does seem weird. No one posted it as news. It was a conversation. A conversation between many people who do not consider themselves reporters or bloggers or anything of the sort. Just a bunch of people supposing together. They (the paper) are the ones who reported on it not us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC