Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goldman Sachs: ''Oil Could hit $105 a Barrel''

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hard Attack Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 11:26 AM
Original message
Goldman Sachs: ''Oil Could hit $105 a Barrel''
_
CALLING ALL CARS....

CNBC @ 11:04 BROADCASTED '' GOLDMAN SACHS REFUSES TO COME ON THE AIR TO DISCUSS, BACK UP THIS CALL''

QUESTIONS ARE BEING RAISED '' IS GOLDMAN SACHS MANIPULATING THE OIL MARKET? ''

________________________

Here is the story...

Goldman Sachs: Oil Could Spike to $105
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20050331/bs_nm/energy_goldman_dc_1

LONDON (Reuters) - Oil markets have entered a "super-spike" period that could see 1970's-style price surges as high as $105 a barrel, investment bank Goldman Sachs said in a research report.

Goldman's Global Investment Research note also raised the bank's 2005 and 2006 New York Mercantile Exchange crude price forecasts to $50 and $55 respectively, from $41 and $40.

These forecasts sit at the top of a table of predictions from 25 analysts, consultants and government bodies surveyed by Reuters.

"We believe oil markets may have entered the early stages of what we have referred to as a "super spike" period -- a multi-year trading band of oil prices high enough to meaningfully reduce energy consumption and recreate a spare capacity cushion only after which will lower energy prices return," Goldman's analysts wrote.

Click Here for full report..
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20050331/bs_nm/energy_goldman_dc_1


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not sure what they're trying to do here.
That's a very lofty price target for the near term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. dang - I'll be working from home a lot
I'd rather spend a crapload once a month on high speed remote video than spend the same crapload every day commuting to work.

actually that would completely and totally murder our economy forever if it "spiked" the way they seem to be setting us up for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excuse me. I have to go put air in the tires on my bicycle. OY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hard Attack Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. CNBC askes their TV Commentator 'Seidman'....
_
and this hack, who is a featured guest on CNBC says, 'well, based on something like if the Terrorists Attack'... 'could disrupt oil production''....

Give me a break, and CNBC plays with the idea, rather than grilling him on it.


I just turned my TV off, its 11:52, and am going to turn on the Al Franken Show, its their 1 year anniversary, the hell with this TV bullshit, I mean, News.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tcfrogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's a research report
When you're doing futures analysis, you have to build in lots of different scenarios and assumptions.

I wouldn't take it too seriously. Yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. All these high oil prices are just being correographed by the
Bush crime family for the purpose of railroading new anti-environmental drilling laws into place, like the one they did last week in the Arctic wildlife sanctuary of Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. but production is pretty much maxed out, and demand
is still rising. Maybe there's some chicanery here, but it won't be all that long before the supply is permanently tight. There's reason to believe that when this happens, prices will be volatile as well as go way up. This is exactly what has happened with natural gas in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallock Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. It could have some positive effects...
Car makers are now more likely to increase the gas mileage because of public demand. If only we could fin a happy medium between the environment and the economy... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC