Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is SS privatization scheme a smoke screen to end employer health insurance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NAO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:04 PM
Original message
Is SS privatization scheme a smoke screen to end employer health insurance
Somewhere I saw the idea suggested that the whole SS privatization scheme is really just a smoke screen to draw flak and progressive energy away from the REAL agenda, which is the ending of employer provided health insurance.

Has anyone else heard this? Is it plausible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. plausible
Yes.

It's already happening.


Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm too brain-dead to see any connection there; I find it more plausible
that it's a scheme to prop up the house-of-cards that is the stock market. It's Wall Street Welfare. More money for those who have money and fuck you to the rest of us.
Chimpy himself acknowledges that his base consists of "the haves and the have mores." He makes it seem like a joke but he's not fuckin' kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wouldn't put anything past them
to have some hidden agenda. Well that and the republicans have hated social security since it first began.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hallalujah, granny!
Somebody else who remembers that infamous quote! Damn, I wanted to smack him for saying that. It just proved how much of an ignorant, greedy f__k he really is.

(High 5 - I'm a granny, too):bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. Actually, I think the macroeconomic effects would be devastating
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 01:20 AM by atre
His scheme is wealth redistribution... from bottom to top.

The law of supply and demand dictates that a tremendous infusion of capital into the private markets ups the demand for stock, immediately raising its value. Because of the increase in the market value of the stock, current investors' wealth rises dramatically.

The losers are the new investors (the owners of these private accounts). Stock values simply cannot keep appreciating at the same rate as they have because the P/E ratios cannot keep declining at the rate they are... We could conceiveably reach a point where people pay $90 for a piece of paper that represents 10 cents in annual gross profit. That's not a good investment. Their best case scenario is that they earn virtually nothing on their investments over the course of their lives. The worst case could be catastrophic.

Eventually, if this private accounts plan is adopted, the market could quickly realize that the stock prices are unsustainable, and when it does, the stock market will collapse.

The rich people who either closely monitor the market themselves or hire people to closlely monitor the market for them and will learn first and cash out before the worst of it hits; the people who have been involuntarily "forced" into the market through private accounts and the people who are indirectly forced into the market through employee stock plans and profit sharing plans are the last to leave the market. They end up holding the bag, taking the loss.

Great Depression II hits. Instead of an FDR figure to calm the stormy passions of the public, however, the press props up a fire-breathing fascist who whips up a squall. No more free speech. No more civil rights. No more civil liberties. Doubtless, the public's rage will be misdirected to some identifiable group (usually an ethnic group), that will carry the cross for the rest of us. And with our military might, certainly we will try to obtain whatever resources we can through conquest. Perpetual war... And there you have it. A perfect storm ends the American democratic experiment.

But that's not all. There's also mass starvation. Social Security no longer exists as a social safety net to protect us from poverty. Because of 2005 reforms, bankruptcy discharge is no longer available to the middle class, and it's already virtually worthless for the lower class. The social safety net of the late twentieth century is gone; instead we have "risk privatization."

In addition, because of globalization and commercial imperialism, our economy is no longer equipped to provide us with the types of goods will need in such dire times (the types we've been importing, foods and raw materials). With the dollar collapsing, we no longer can afford these expensive imports. We go from a "knowledge worker", service-based economy to an agrarian society in a matter of years, with millions of people starving to death in the interim.

(Disclaimer: Despite my Malthusian-like pessimism, I am not an economist; I've only had a couple classes on the subject. However, I am very interested in seeing what the macroeconomic effects that capital infusion through private accounts would have, and this at least seems plausible to me now.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPoet64 Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I read an article a week or so ago here at DU--haven't been
able to find it since. If anyone has a link, please post. I think a bill may be introduced soon regarding employer provided health insurance and limits and such.

Please post! I'm interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Here is DU thread
Edited on Tue Mar-29-05 10:26 PM by papau
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=222x632

Healthcare Overhaul Is Quietly Underway (Bush tries to end "insurance")


Actions by government, insurers, employers and individuals are already underway to destroy health care as a shared risk - Clinton's "Portability" via all employers chipping chip in for universal health insurance is replaced by Bush as the "Portability" of "it's your own problem" (besides Bush would give income tax breaks to low-income families - of course only on the FIT they do not pay - and not on the payroll tax that they do pay).


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-health31jan31,1,3062069.story?coll=la-headlines-nation

Healthcare Overhaul Is Quietly Underway
By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar
Times Staff Writer

January 31, 2005

WASHINGTON — Emboldened by their success at the polls, the Bush administration and Republican leaders in Congress believe they have a new opportunity to move the nation away from the system of employer-provided health insurance that has covered most working Americans for the last half-century.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPoet64 Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Thank you! That's the one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nationalized Heath Care would be a smokescreen to end
employer health insurance.....

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. I really doubt it..
Edited on Tue Mar-29-05 10:23 PM by sendero
... I never cease to be amazed at how everything Bush** does is a subterfuge to hide a more devious agenda, NOT.

First of all, the idea that he's gonna "sap progressive strength" with a bogus issue - well that issue is costing him as we speak. For the first time Americans are not going along with the program. Tell me again how waking up Americans to the fact that Bush** is full of shit helps him to advance another agenda?

You want to see a backlash against conservatives that they won't recover from in our lifetimes? Fuck up health insurance for the employed. SS is a distant future thing for most people and it isn't flying, try taking away the rank and file's health insurance and see how that plays.

It ain't gonna happen. Not even Republicans are that fucking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. sorry - but GOP is killing employer provided health care - here's link
Edited on Tue Mar-29-05 10:28 PM by papau
granted they may not win - but they are trying

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=222x632

Healthcare Overhaul Is Quietly Underway (Bush tries to end "insurance")


Actions by government, insurers, employers and individuals are already underway to destroy health care as a shared risk - Clinton's "Portability" via all employers chipping chip in for universal health insurance is replaced by Bush as the "Portability" of "it's your own problem" (besides Bush would give income tax breaks to low-income families - of course only on the FIT they do not pay - and not on the payroll tax that they do pay).


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-health31jan31,1,3062069.story?coll=la-headlines-nation

Healthcare Overhaul Is Quietly Underway
By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar
Times Staff Writer

January 31, 2005

WASHINGTON — Emboldened by their success at the polls, the Bush administration and Republican leaders in Congress believe they have a new opportunity to move the nation away from the system of employer-provided health insurance that has covered most working Americans for the last half-century.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. I'm sorry...
... but I don't consider obvious trial balloons to be statements of real intention.

If the GOP does this they will singlehandedly put themselves out of office. Bush** can dream all he wants, the Repug congress is not going to shoot themselves in the heart for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. "Not even Republicans are that fucking stupid."
No, they are not. They'll blame it on small business. I can see it coming.

I provide health care for my employees, but if government takes away my deduction from my business, HOW can I compete with the box stores that do not provide?

If I drop the health care and add to the millions not covered, who is at fault? Me.

Selfish, greedy me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. I believe that is part of the "Tax Reform" they want to do - get rid
of the tax credits or deductions for business who provide health insurance to their employees.

The idiocy of this leaves me speechless - almost!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think they'd dare --
it would piss off so many people and leave such a huge hole in family economics that it would make it not only possible, but probable to push through a national health care system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murdoch Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. school privatization is the real agenda
Edited on Tue Mar-29-05 10:43 PM by murdoch
As Deep Throat once said "follow the money". Look at what the conservative foundations have been pouring tens (maybe hundreds) of millions of dollars into for years - school privatization.

Look at the recent bankruptcy bill debacle - the credit card industry gave one and a half million dollars last year to members of the House Financial Services Committee alone. With the money they'll make from whatever they pushed through (are they bringing back debtors prisons?) it will have been worth it.

The conservative foundations have been working to line Wall Street up behind Social Security privatization and have had some success (but will probably firm things up next try). Just follow the money and see what big guns are being lined up.

The main financial (and door-knocking) muscle the Democrats used to have was labor unions, but since labor unions have been evaporating in the US for decades (Over one third of the workforce was unionized in the 1950's - today 8% of the private workforce is), well, it's no wonder the Republicans control the presidency, both houses of Congress and have appointed 7 of the 9 supreme court justices.

One thing I should add - these things don't spring out of nowhere. Often, they do try to keep these things secret, especially things like trade agreements, but they always leak out somehow. Any plan that's hatched has been in the works for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaliTracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. YES! Besides wanting dumbed downed citizens, they want ultimate
control...

Read Education, Inc. : Turning Learning into a Business edited
by Alfie Kohn and Patrick Shannon

also read Why Is Corporate America Bashing Our Public Schools? by Susan Ohanian and Kathy Emery


For a daily update on atrocities in the name of education go to


http://www.susanohanian.org/





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. I have wondered. I am being assailed from both sides. The insurance
companies are pushing me to cancel my small biz insurance (legacy from Lawton, once cancelled never regained) and provide "individual" policys (pick and chose.) Now the government wants to tax me for providing health insurance. As a small biz employer, I am caught between big insurance and big government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaliTracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
16. the trend is leaning toward Medical Savings Accounts... I work in
small company. A few months ago, out at lunch with the "girls" the HR person said they were looking into using Medical Savings Accounts instead of the insurance we have.

I am married, DH is trying to start his own business after being laid off last year (so he is covered under my insurance), and we have a 5yr son. When the HR person mentioned the $2,000 deductable before catastrophic care would kick in I nearly died -- I am living too close to the edge of the finacial abyss to even imagine what would happen if I needed to cough up that much $$ before getting the insurance $$. You can put tax deferred money into the account -- but what happens if there is an accident (my spouse had a skiing accident (out of state) a couple of years ago -- which, after doing the emergency room/trauma care out of state, after he came back and saw several doctors, and after the shoulder and knee surgery, the bill was over $7,000. He had been at his place of employment (he was working then) over 6 years. But, if the same thing happened directly after "starting" this plan -- how much would we have to pay out of pocket before insurance would pay? They are banking on "young workers" not having big medical problems -- but at 40, I've already had an MS scare (it wasn't, but had to have CAT scans and seizure tests -- over $2,500 -- not to mention a C-Section birth (which gave us a healthy baby (not that I'm having anymore...).) I was ready to go into our March Benefits meeting armed with questions, but they opted to stay with the insurance plan they currently have.

I'm still trying to find out more -- for I may not be so lucky next year. She even told us they are doing it so their bottom line can improve. For me, I still need more information.

Here are a few sites which talk about pros and cons....

Medical Savings Accounts: Theory, Politics, Pros, and Cons
Thomas J. Hendrix, PhD, RN
Kathleen Kaufman, RN, MS
The Internal Revenue Service recently ruled all employers, regardless of size, can adopt a medical savings account–type program as part of an employee benefit package. This frees all employers to adopt a version of a consumer-driven health plan as part of their benefit package. This could continue a trend toward consumer-driven health insurance that began with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. The authors review current health insurance problems, including a discussion of competitive market and insurance theory. The medical savings account experiment is summarized, including pros, cons, politics, and theory. Finally, the authors briefly review the theory of agency and conclude with a call for nursing to fill this niche quickly for the good of our patients.

more: http://ppn.sagepub.com/cgi/content/short/4/1/82


Medical Savings Accounts: The Pros and Cons of Rationing
from BlueCollar Dollar
http://bluecollardollar.com/MSA.html

this site looks like it provides HSAs-- http://www.msainfo.net/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC