Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dear centrists - how do you feel today?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:29 PM
Original message
Dear centrists - how do you feel today?
Shall we forgive the traitorous three that just destroyed one of the last great bastions of natural beauty in this nation?

Shall we say "now, now" and wait to "pick our battles" down the road?

Do you realize now how hollow your arguments ring? How even a "DINO" Democrat is better than a Republican? How we need to work for a majority in Congress, and running real Democrats in selected primary races would only weaken the case?

This is only the beginning, my fine centrist friends - only the beginning.

If you'd like to join us in helping bring back the Democratic party, we welcome you. But if you don't, expect no quarter, for you are very very wrong.

We will stop you - we have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
southpaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I echo your sentiments, DB!
The only thing you get by straddling the fence is a fence-post up the ass!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. .
:kick: too good to sink early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. There is room for all points of view in my opinion
Not just hard left in the Dem party. Heck, by DU standards I'm probably a conservative although I am a liberal Dem!

I'm disappointed in the vote, but I'd still rather have moderate Dems than some wingnut republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
47. THERE IS NO HARD LEFT IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
when will you get that through your head?

hard corporate-friendly center-left maybe. but LEFT left? radical libertarian socialist, green, tree hugging left? chomsky left? howard zinn left?

PUH LEEZ

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Republican centrists opposed the drilling
Many democrat centrists opposed the drilling. How is centrist defined on the issues - or is it anyone that we disagree with at the moment. I think some of our DINOs opposed drilling - are they no longer DINOs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Egzactly.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Screw the labels. These THREE people deserve our scorn, but
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 02:42 PM by mzmolly
please don't chalk it up to "centrism."

Clinton (a centrist) did not support drilling in ANWR. When we label a.k.a. Naderize everything, we fail to hold individuals accountable by condemning the entire Democratic Party.

Let us remember the fight WE DEMOCRATS put up as well. And, NEVER let Nader and his minions forget it.

"The DEMOCRATS supported drilling in ANWR" I can hear the lying shitbag already. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. the Hawaii Dems
are hardly centrists. They are generally liberal on most issues. They made the wrong vote, but that doesn't mean they are centrist.

By the way, this vote doesn't even come up if Dems are in control, but nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Ah, well
Just a wrong vote. The beginning of the ripping apart of environmental legislation that took years to get passed.

But hey, they're pretty good guys, anyway,

And hey, if we were in the majority, this vote wouldn't have even come up. Of course, if we had Democrats who cared more about their constituents than the oil/gas contributors that fund their campaigns than the bill would have been defeated, AND we could have successfully painted Bush as a rabid anti-environmentalist (which of course he is), AND we could have stopped future assaults on the air and water (which are sure to come).

But what the heck, it's only ONE vote, right????

As the elephant gets eaten one bite at a time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. ah
blame the Dems because three Senators voted for it rather than the Republicans and the more than 45 Senators that voted against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Let's see - if 3 Dems, who supposedly have our interests at heart,
had voted for the Cantwell Amendment, there would be no drilling in Alaska.

But I'm not supposed to blame them.

Could you be so kind as to tell me whom I should blame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. how about
the vast majority of the Republican caucus that not only voted for it, but promoted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Because that's what the Republicans do.
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 03:08 PM by Goldmund
We have no influence over Republicans. We do over Democrats, who are there because of our votes -- the Republicans aren't.

The Republicans will loot and pillage. We all know that. Democrats are the only hope of stopping them.

Some fucking hope.

On Edit: what you're saying is similar to "how come those protesters are protesting against Bush, but not Saddam and Osama?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Nope, sorry
We KNEW what they were about.

We THOUGHT we knew what we were about.

Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. all but three Dems voted the right way
The senators from Hawaii have a long record of doing the right thing. Landrieau not as much, but she's the best we can get out of that state right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FromTheLeft Donating Member (157 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. The are not supposed to have our interests at heart
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 03:09 PM by FromTheLeft
They are supposed to hold the beliefs and principals of the constituency that elected them and represent those ideals to the best of their ability.

These three in general have good voting records. Just because they acted differently on one vote than you would have liked does not make them evil, it makes them not you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. they do have their constituents in mind
the people of the states that elected these 3 Senators support their votes including the Democrats in those states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Doesn't Inouye have an excellent record on votes for the people and
the land? What the #$&@ happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. I thought this as well
Are gas prices in HI prohibitively high (discounting the natural logistical increase), and were both of them swayed by this?

I do not know the answer, but one would think that they would have been at least informed enough to know that ANWR "will promote energy independence" was nothing more than a bold-faced lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. They warn Dean "do no harm." Then they do it themselves.
I am outraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. How does your ranting help the party?
And yes, there are many more important battles than ANWR, sorry.

At least the senate dems are planning to stand their ground on Bush judgicial nominees.

Shall we forgive the traitorous three that just destroyed one of the last great bastions of natural beauty in this nation?

Not that I believe that drilling in ANWR is a good thing, but this over the top and untrue statement is nothing but spin. Only more obvious than the phoney arguments FOR drilling in ANWR. It does not help our case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. What is "our cause"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
42. What I'm responding to is the over the top statement
that ANWR has just been "destroyed". Statements like this do not ever help get a progressive message accross.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. OK, if you insist, I'll rephrase --
-- what is the progressive message?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. And statements/sentiments like yours pretty much ALWAYS
hold us back, serving to enable and embolden the thug opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Wait till they come after you and your business
Bush will frame that debate in such a way that Democrats will jumping on his back to get photo-ops.

And if you don't think Bush and the boys will make Alaska look like West Virginia, well, I can't help you there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. I don't think W Virginia has been "destroyed"
and I like the fact that I have electricity. I was responding to the OP comments that ANWR was just "destroyed", when they are talking about a relatively small footprint.

This is not to say that it is worth it in any way. I just like to see more honest talking points than hysteria.

Like the fact that it is an insignifigant amount of oil that will probably be sold to japan rather than used in the US, and that we should delay drilling as long as possible there.

And your right about them coming after me. And half of DU will be all for it too. I have NO comfort from either the right or the left.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. "And half of DU will be all for it too'
Well, I'll be in the other half. :)

West Virginia, however, is a giant strip mine with cities on each end.

I know - I live next door.

My fear is that ANWR will be destoyed, not because it is the right way to gather oil but because Bush et al. could care less. If it is more profiitable to blow it up, then they'll blow it up.

DId the Exxon Valdez leave a "small footprint?"

It has nothing to do with "liking electricity". BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Yeah, sure...
Once the Democrats are back in office, they will wave their magic wand and all the pristine wilderness will come back!

There are some things that cannot be changed back, restored, or recovered, once it is gone.

What the fuck is "our cause" anymore, anyway? Stopping Judaical nominees? Is that all this party can do? Can they even do that? I'm not holding my breath.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. What are they saving themselves for? They are 3-0.
One-sided class action lawsuits, the one-sided bankrtupcy bill, and now ANWR!

I am sorry, but it is just not good enough for Democrats to protect Social Security and keep a few Neanderthals off the bench. Republicans would not accept such a lousy batting average on issues that represent the core of their values--access to the courts, basic consumer protections in bankrtupcy, and raping the environment for short-term greed.

Not good enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Of the three votes you mentioned
ANWR is at the bottom of my list. Sorry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think the problem are DINOS, not "centrists"
Howard Dean is a self-proclaimed "centrist", and he's 100% opposed to ANWR drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. not to mention
folks like Salazar, Baucus and other centrists who voted the right way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. A FUCKIN MEN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. Let's not forget...
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 03:07 PM by Goldmund
...this isn't just about ANWR. It is about what is an accepted environmental paradigm. It's about what comes above what in the value system of US governing. ANWR is a tragedy on itself; but expect many more tragic legislations to come. This is just one of the precedents in the ongoing shifting of legislative principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. many of the Dems who voted against drilling are far more centrist than
the Hawaii Dems who can't really be called centrist from their overall voting record.

so i'm not really sure what the point of this post is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I don't think he's talking about the three senators necessarily.
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 03:12 PM by Goldmund
He's talking about the "let's compromise until our balls turn blue" crowd in general. DancingBear can correct me if I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. still doesn't make sense
since many of the Senators who compromise voted with Democrats on this while 2 who voted against are ones who are mostly reliable supporters.

all 3 of the Dem senators who voted against it did it because of their states where they are elected. the people in their states support their votes including Democrats in those states.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
37. No, you are correct
Upon re-reading my initial post I can see where some folks get that impression from, however. "Centrists" does indeed refer to those who excuse the AG vote, the ANWR vote, etc. on the premise that the devil you know is better than the one you don't.

That was a poor choice of linkage/header on my part, but alas, since the editing period has expired I'll just have to live with it.

Apologies are in order - bad Bear. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MISSDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. The really sad thing
is that with drilling we will import 65% of our oil and without drilling we will import 68%. It is just not enough difference even if you don't care about the environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. WRONG, WRONG, WRONG
This has zilch to do with centrism-the Senators from HI are not centrists.

Why use this to pick a fight?

BTW-I agree with your "DINO" statement, but disagree with your mocking statements about regaining control of congress.

The only thing I can think of is that you're head is so wound up from the ANWR bullshit that you can't see straight. I understand.

But centrists are not your enemy.

Those who wish to take back congress are not your enemy.

And even people who (truthfully) want to pick their battles are not your enemy.

Who is the "we" that you represent, and who is the "you" thatyou think you have to stop?

I'll bet that my definition of "we" and "you" are different than yours, and that my definition is more open, respectful, and pragmatic than yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. My "enemy"...
..are those who vote for the interests of the Super Wealthy and Corporate Class at the expense of Labor, the Working Class, the Poor, or the Environment. I don't care if they are labeled Liberal or Conservative, Democrat of Republican.

If they are selling their vote to the Big Corps (DLC), I will work to remove them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. I don't believe
the Senators from Hawaii were doing what you say. They voted wrong, but they voted this way because of who they represent. Also, not all working people oppose drilling in anwr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. What were they thinking in Hawaii???
Has anyone figured that out yet.

And yes, some working men did support drilling, especially Alaskans, and SOME would benefit from the drilling, but the OVERALL effect of drilling in Anwar would have negligible effect on the Working Class in America. The number or REAL jobs provided by despoiling Anwar is minimal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Response
1) If you'd like, read some of my previous postings - you'll see I have no desire to pick fights. I do, however, speak up when I feel like we (collective Democratic "we", in this case) are being sold down river.

2) Sorry, but I don't get "wound up." I DO, however, see very clearly the patterns that are emerging within the second Bush term. He is playing this group of cowardly Democrats like a fiddle, and unless they stand AS ONE to stop his incredibly dangerous policies it will be too late.

3) When you are being shot at from 50 directions, it makes no sense to try and pick your battle and protect your head. This results, of course, in five other fatal injuries, but a very clean head. It DOES make sense, however, to shoot back. In this political climate, the phrase "if Capone sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue" is very true.

4) Not only am I not a psychologist, I don't even play one on TV. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
36. Hey! Let's move to Hawaii for 2006
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 03:40 PM by calipendence
We can have fun living there and at the same time get someone to replace Akaka with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
45. You have a point
but in this case it doesn't apply as well.

The two I am most disgusted with are Akaka and Landreu, supporting both ANWR and the bankrp. bill.

Inouye isn't bad overall, but he has to get over his AK/HI deal. It's stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC