Texas Study: "Tort Reform" unneeded. Few real abuses found.

[Atman]

I don't know if this would actually count as LBN...if so, please move it there, mods.

---

"HOUSTON (Reuters) - A study released on Thursday cast doubt on whether recent "tort reform" in Texas that limited payouts in medical malpractice lawsuits and is similar to what President Bush (news - web sites) wants nationally was really needed.

The study looked at Texas Department of Insurance records dating back to 1988 and found claims that medical costs were soaring because of too many malpractice lawsuits, the supposed reason for the reform, were not true.

"We find no evidence of the medical malpractice crisis that produced headlines over the last several years and led to legal reform in Texas and other states," said the study, conducted by law professors at the University of Texas, University of Illinois and Columbia University law schools.

Only a few states have comprehensive insurance databases like that of Texas, said David Hyman, one of the study authors, but similar studies elsewhere have found nothing to indicate a link between litigation and rising medical costs.

"Everyone who is collecting data is finding more or less the same thing -- there is no evidence of a tort crisis," he told Reuters...."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=615&e=9&u=/nm/20050310/pl_nm/politics_malpractice_d

[The Backlash Cometh]

1. No shit? There goes another conventional wisdom down the toilet.

[Al-CIAda]

2. This was already known and used to debunk the false 'tort reform'

arguement. I can only imagine what horrific crimes companies will perpetrate on the citizenry with virtual immunity.