Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton, Santorum, Brownback & Lieberman against TV sex &violence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:17 PM
Original message
Hillary Clinton, Santorum, Brownback & Lieberman against TV sex &violence
Hil gets an odd pal in battle vs. sex TV

BY MAGGIE HABERMAN
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton stood with one of her most conservative colleagues yesterday to announce a bill to curb sex-and-violence-drenched TV shows and video games.

Clinton (D-N.Y.) has several co-sponsors - including Sens. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) and Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.) - for the bill, which would provide government funding to closely study the impact of such video games and shows on kids. But it was conservative Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) who caught the eye of political watchers.

At a Kaiser Family Foundation event before a news conference, Clinton, who's believed to be eying a 2008 White House run, called the proliferation of violence and sex in the media "a silent epidemic." Clinton, Santorum and the others submitted a similar bill last May, but it went nowhere.

Some observers believe Clinton is ratcheting up overtures toward the political right for '08; Santorum is a leading Senate conservative and a lightening rod among gay activists for his anti-gay marriage beliefs.

More:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/v-pfriendly/story/288521p-246977c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sex and violence against TVs are something we should all be against
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't like S&V either... best way I've seen to counter it yet
Edited on Thu Mar-10-05 02:33 PM by comsymp


ON EDIT: I didn't, however, have a problem with Tipper's music rating crusade. Making information available to consumers (parents) is a far cry from censorship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't think you got my joke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Nope- at least not on first reading... tho to be fair
I have been known to abuse my TV, both physically and verbally. Guess my previous response should have been to the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
57. Tippers crusade lend to cenorship
mall owners evicted Music stores that had songs on the Filthy 15
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArtVandaley Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Caught that turn of phrase
And I agree, I'm not in favor of having sex with or beating up TVs either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. Turn off your TV, why do we need Government telling us what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. Can we "Turn off Bush or the RW? It's the same thing. They are cramming
stuff down my throat and in my face I don't want. Same thing with MSM...don't I have a say in America, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. I agree and I'm one of the more Left of the LW Dems here.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Study the effect of violent, false and irresponsible WH rhetoric on TV.
What effect does it have on our children to have the President promoting lies, terrorism, torture, and war as the solutions to our problems?

That's what they should be studying.


Hillary: :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary is "for the children". But, voted for the war that's killing them
Looks like the birds of a feather are flocking. Brownback, Lieberman and Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I think Hillary has decided
that the best way to keep her power is to jump on the evangelical bandwagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I think the only way for us to regain power
Is to dump Hillary, Jomentum, Kerry, a couple of Nelson's and a few more sellouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I agree
It distintly is looking like if the Democrats have any hope as a resistance party to the facist theocrocy currently morphing our government, it is going to have to be built from the ground up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. When are they going to talk about censoring the fundie channels?
Like the 700 Club? Hate in the name of Gawd is far worse than fictional violence on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Of course I am against violence and sex on TV for kids
Edited on Thu Mar-10-05 02:39 PM by Mass
but who determines what is sex and violence.

I want to choose what my kids watch, not let the governement decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yet she is 100% behind the real blood and guts violence
in the real world.

Pandering phoney and rank opportunist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Woah! Such Brave Politicians
Reeeeeally going out on a limb there.

What a bullshit non issue.


Pander, pander, pander
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Really?? Going to rid the TV of those ERECTION Levitra commercials?
Edited on Thu Mar-10-05 02:59 PM by OneTwentyoNine
http://www.levitra.com/consumer/erection_quality/erection_function.htm

Ya know you can protect your kid from seeing Howard Stern if you wish by merely not letting them watch or blocking the show.

How do you block that Levitra commerical with the woman drolling about A LASTING ERECTION when you have no idea when it will be shown next??

It doesn't come on at 10 pm,its run during prime time hours. So Liberman,Clinton and ass wipe Brownback from Kansas,what will you do about that commercial??

Probably OK,since its a big ass drug company making millions off of sex,horrible if someone like Stern makes millions off of sex.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. LOL .........
I HATE the Levitra commercial and that drooling woman who talks about her partners erections.

Her grin just creeps me out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retnavyliberal Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
53. It is the best marketing plan in history....
telling men a "side effect" is a 4 hour woody. Guys will be lining up around the block like the drug store was a soup kitchen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. I hated Al Gore for a long time
When he chaired the Senate Inquisition on dirty rock music lyrics. I loved it when Frank Zappa made a fool out of him and Paula Hawkins.

Now you have Chuck Schumer recruiting pro-life Dems, and forcing out progressives for the Senate next year. I thought we weren't going to run further to the right anymore.

I'm really getting disgusted with our so-called "leaders". There's 70 million people in this country that don't bother to vote because of this shit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Porn Wars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
47. Tipper Gore got a "bum rap." I understand that Zappa had many on his
side but that was a different time.

I think Tipper should have pressed harder and had a big discussion with Zappa. But even then they would have been apart. I went with Tipper...I'm not sorry. There need to be some limits when things go too far. What Tipper asked for was warnings. Hardly oppressive. People still smoke and disreguard the warnings. But, some take them to heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Oh, horseshit.
Edited on Thu Mar-10-05 03:49 PM by TheWraith
During my youth I saw a considerably amount of Looney Tunes--or, as Senator Sanitarium would call it, "Graphic violence, shootings, torture of animals and people including the use of explosives, sexual innuendoes, cross-dressing, self-injury, faked deaths, and other negative imagery." I think I turned out reasonably well. The only thing on TV that makes me genuinely dangerous is cable news.

I think that if somebody can't draw a line between fantasy and reality, then THAT is their problem, not that they're seeing too much violence on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. Interesting--and nothing to say about the fake journalist
with a fake name who was a male whore who catered to other males, who had several web sites advertising his wares , connected his activities to the US Marines,called himself Bulldog, lobbed soft ball questions at press conferences and was addressed by his fake name by none other than our presidrent?

Nothing Hillary?

How much sex are you willing to ignore when it comes to the security of this country--a porn man, advertising to other men, in the know about Plame and had information about the invasion before anyone else. Nothing Hillary? Rick? Joe?

This is an issue that is softball playing, imo, Can't go wrong when it comes to family values.

There is so much more violence going on day after day after day--so much rape, and so much hatred as the result of this slaughter in Iraq and these willow heads are concerned about TV violence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. Alliance with Brownback?
Hillary has jumped the shark for good this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. People say that every week around here.
She still has an excellent voting record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. It is not ok to team with Santorum and Brownback
And to trust them to decide what is porn and violence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why doesn't Hillary just go ahead and change her party affiliation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. Is she trying to be hated by an entire generation?
Alienate the gamers, sure! We're only half in reality anyway!

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go play my ultra-violent escapist murderfest video games just to spite these jackasses who consider it their personal mission to kill anything fun or interesting in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. My question amongst all the bitching....
If she does run in 08', and wins the primary...are you all voting for her anyway?
I've heard alot of stirrings amongst Green Party people lately....and let me tell you....they will heavily promote their candidate next time. If the democrats wish to call it quits and run her in the general, we're out of power for another 8 yrs at least.
Sorry, but I can't, no ...I won't pull the lever for her. Triangulation worked temporarily for Bill. We lost alot more because of it over time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. No and I will not do it again
period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
40. I'll just say that she had better not campaign on this issue.
Just as attacking firearm ownership enrages many gun enthusiasts, censorship of media and entertainment is a major deal-breaker for a lot of us, particularly those of us who lean libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. I think Sex & Violence are very dangerous to young minds -especially
boys who are so vulnerable to 'pictures'. Mixing sex & violence in games is bad. We know this stuff is bad for young minds. We have the proof. So who are we if we do not act on this information then we are negligent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Santorum and Brownback should not be defining this.
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Mostly every single movie I have seen recently contains
violence. What? We are to go back to "The sound of Music" as the way that our media should go as far as entertainment movies go?

There is no alternative offered here by these four. That should give a clue as to their jumping on this family values schtick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. I think that the video games marketed towards kids should be sex &
hard core violence free. And strict regulations on people under the age of 18 getting their hands on bad movies as well as games. As to after 18 - well nothing wrong with Quiten Tarantino. Kill Bill Vol 2 was amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. So do the kids who buy these use their own money?
to buy these? Where do they get the money from, assuming they are in the ten to twelve year old age brackett or younger?

Is it only video games or is it also within the film industry with all of their "ratings" most of which warn against violence and language, that are publilshed before one watches the film?




Is is not up to parents to monitor that and not the good old boys in the Senate who I suspect are simply playing this game for all it is worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Well I have not studied it but I saw a new story or two on some violent
anti-woman video game. And I know from experience with kids that a kid can pester a parent. Please, please. It is very hard to keep kids away from things that are marketed towards them. So - it would be nice if the industry did a little "ya - okay" and didn't hoist all externalities onto anyone but themselves.

That is the big question of the day - isn't it? If the most efficient delivery system is a market or a corporation and they wash their hands (by competition) of any responsibility... well then: DAM! I'd like to solve the problem using inefficient means and ways - the slower and least effective way the better!!! I don't think so.

And don't tell me to get some religion and home school my kids if I do not like it. I am saying there is a problem in the structure as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. It is like corporations want all the efficiencies to work in their favour
Edited on Thu Mar-10-05 11:03 PM by applegrove
and then if any regulating needs to be done it should be done by something that does not interfere in their efficient and beautiful markets.

Corporations want to use the markets... but they do not want human beings to use the markets to meet their own goals. Human beings used markets for 10,000 years before the corporation was invented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Well, that's a failure of parenting.
Jesus, the government can't step in and regulate just because some people are push-overs. This is just another example of casting aside personal responsibility for one's own decisions, like those morons who sued Hershey's or whatever.

Anyway, you can't afford to give in to a whining child, because then they know that their pestering will be effective in the future. As with many situations in raising children, you have to operantly condition them by rejecting the behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. So - the market is for corporations to use as a tool. But corporations
are not for humans to use as a tool. Humans have to go back to using customary law, etc. Thank you for clarifying that. Good to know that we has people have no rights to touch anything corporate. You can make a product that will jerk a kid's mind around - but Shhhhhhhh don't touch the market.

Why is it that you think I as a human being should not have at my disposal the same efficient tools as you do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Gunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. correct
I have a 10 year old and a 4 year old. I monitor everything. It's a lot of work. My 10 year old daughter has begged to have a tv in her room, but It's not going to happen. I brought home a game demo from Best Buy, too much violence and bad language, I threw it out. I'm doing my job as a parent. I dont need the government to do my job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. LOL I would never tell you to get religion
as I am an atheist.

What I am questioning is: who controls the kid? The parents or the corporations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #45
54. The question is what are markets there for to benefit? Our families our
or markets there to benefit the corporation?

The corporation is just a tool. If we follow your logic...pretty soon all the markets will get together and take over the USA government and say that it is not okay of corporations to be saying how deregulated the markets should be. That patent law, property law and fiat money laws all just interfere with the actual laws of the market jungle.

Quid pro quo: who are the markets there for in the end? Human beings or corporations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. Love it when conservatives
try to control the "free market" they always hold so dear to them. Honestly, this will not go anywhere. The violent shows are popular because PEOPLE WATCH THEM. The violence will subside if people change channels or turn off their TVs.

Conservatives don't want the government to interfer on how they discipline their kids but they seem to have no problem yammering on about what we should be able to watch on TV.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
31. Don't these people have better things to do?
Like, I don't know, balancing a budget or getting us out of an illegal war or getting better healthcare? Instead they are going to waste time on this nonsense. Waste of tax dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
35. I am so fucking sick of politicians trying to baby the American people
by obliterating the media and modes of entertainment that we choose to either enjoy or ignore. Consenting adults shouldn't have to live in a strictly G-rated world just because there are parents out there who are too negligent to take care of their own children's mental development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. There's no balance in entertainment today just as in the Political MSM.
I don't want to watch crap or have my kids watch Realty Shows, Fat Shows...anything which demeans the average person. It's crap...All of it. We need balance so that there really is "CHOICE!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #49
56. Then, KoKo, do not watch reality shows, or fat shows, or crap.
I don't like it much either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
37. Hillary Clinton gave political cover to Santorum, not good for her
image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
43. So am I and I've got a solution that doesn't require repressive laws
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
44. Instead of the blanket "sex and violence"
Why can't it be "stupid, pandering, low-brow shit," including everything from Reality television to Terry Bradshaw?

Why do people stand up for "conservative social culture," but no one stands up for "high culture?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudbluestater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
50. Isn't this WHY we have the V-CHIP?????????
Hillary is just begging to never be elected again in this country.

I read in The Nation that the DLC is now DEAD. Are these fools trying to put it on life support now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. If the DLC is dead...
Then who is voting for all this right wing FASCIST BULLSHIT being passed through Congress lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
51. There are boobs on my tv all the time.
it's called Cable News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
58. Yea!
Let's have a man that goes raving about man on dog sex defining what porn is.

Healthcare, wars, opposing the admin, are all negligable duties, but oh my God! Theh Sex and violence on TV - Won't anyone think of the children?!

Stupid fuckin politicians.

Now why is this woman considered the front runner again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC