Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Secret Service lies about Gannon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:20 PM
Original message
Secret Service lies about Gannon

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/03/secret-service-lies-today-about.html

The US Secret Service lied to members of Congress today in a letter responding to concerns about GannonGuckert's access to the White House.

In the letter, as reported by Raw Story, "there was no deviation from Secret Service standards and procedures" in order to give GannonGuckert access to the White House.

But this a flat out lie.

-snip- (here they give 5 reasons)

The bottom line is that GG was given a de facto hard pass to the White House, even though he only applied for a day pass. And if the Secret Service is now going to tell us that this is following procedures, then Congress and the media should demand an immediately investigation of just what those procedures really are. Because GannonGuckert was permitted to metaphorically "walk around the metal detectors" of the White House, and someone should be asking why.
----------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick.. The motto of the right wing cabal/admin is:
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 01:27 PM by higher class
NO LIE OR THEFT IS TOO BLATANT OR TOO MUCH OF AN INSULT TO THE LITTLE PEOPLE WHO WE DESPISE AND WHOSE LIVELIHOOD WE WILL DESTROY AND WHOSE PRIVACY WE WILL OWN. BRING ON THE NON-OWNERSHIP SOCIETY FOR OUR CONTROL AND MANIPULATION!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. You snipped out the salient points
1. GannonGuckert (GG) had a "day pass" to the White House, not a "hard pass." A day pass gives you one day access, a hard pass gives you repeated, unlimited, ongoing, and regular access to the White House.

2. But using a day pass, GannonGuckert in fact received repeated, unlimited, ongoing and regular access to the White House for over a two year period, even though he never was given a hard pass. I.e., GG was given a de facto hard pass without going through the proper rigorous background check required for such a pass.

3. Why does this matter? It matters because there must be some national security reason why hard pass reporters are required to get 3-month FBI background checks. Presumably the reason is that hard pass reporters, unlike day pass reporters who only go to the White House once (or at best, once in a very blue moon), will be spending a lot of regular time in the White House, mingling with senior officials as high as the president, over an extended and ongoing period. That gives hard pass reporters the kind of access that could make them a security risk if we didn't know for a fact that they're good people. That's why hard pass reporters are required to get the 3-month FBI background check. To make sure there's nothing in their background, or present, to suggest they could be, or have been, compromised, or in any other way pose a threat.

4. But GG got the same kind of ongoing, regular and intimate access to the White House as any hard pass reporter - and thus GG posed the same potential risk to national security as any hard pass reporter - yet GG was never forced to get a hard pass, and thus never required to get the hard pass 3-month FBI background check (during which the Secret Service would have found that GG was involved in an ongoing criminal enterprise (prostitution) and that he had a $20,000 default tax judgment against him from the state of Delaware (both things that could make him a security risk)).

5. So, in conclusion, GG got hard pass access to the White House simply using a day pass.


Those aren't five reasons, they are five steps in an argument.

It all boils down to 5: procedures were violated by repeatedly giving a day pass to someone who did not qualify for a hard pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. He was given unprecedented access-
Now the SS is lying about that access. So...who's giving the orders? IMO-that's the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. The scandal is not what laws were broken, it is that this is legal
and available as an operating procedure.

The Secret Service just allows a political whitehouse to carve out exceptions to protection.

Just as law doesn't reach Gitmo, and the constitution doesn't apply an "enemy combatant", this administration just creates a loophole that it can use at will to get Guckert in and keep M. Dowd out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. and now...
...the prostitute has threatened with blackmail the ranking member of the SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE. If this were happening in Britain, the fracas would be 24/7 news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC