Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IMUS really stuck it to Santorum this morning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 10:37 AM
Original message
IMUS really stuck it to Santorum this morning
Imus's wife has been very active in a campaign to reduce or eliminate the levels of mercury in vaccines ... there is substantial anecdotal evidence (not confirmed by CDC studies) that increased heavy metal levels in vaccines has contributed to the very significant spike in children being diagnosed with autism ...

a Senate bill that Santorum has been pushing would absolve pharmaceutical companies from liability when drugs they produce cause harm to patients ...

Imus really did an excellent job getting in Santorum's face about this ... Santorum weakly tried to defend the bill by arguing that the pharmaceutical industry needs to be encouraged to produce drugs that might be needed to react to bio-terrorism ... Santorum said that some of these drugs might have serious side effects but still would do far more good than harm in a crisis ...

IMUS, however, pointed out that the law, then, should only apply to drugs that would deal with things like an anthrax outbreak but should not apply to regular, childhood innoculations ... Santorum said something like he'll look into it ...

Every time Santorum tried to squirm away, IMUS just kept hitting him over and over with same arguments and Santorum never had an answer ... once again, the threat of terrorism is being used to justify screwing the American public for the benefit of the GOP's corporate friends ...

and one final point ... Santorum tried to argue that, since 1999, it was no longer legal to include thimerosal (mercury-containing preservative) in vaccines ... of course, that shouldn't indemnify the pharmaceutical industry from paying for past damages it may have caused ... but Santorum wasn't exactly telling the whole truth about mercury in vaccines ... check out this article from May, 2004 that shows thimerosal is still being used in flu vaccines:

source: http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/general/news/may0604thimerosal.html

May 6, 2004 – Almost 5 years ago, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the US Public Health Service joined in calling for removal of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from vaccines. By 2001, all the vaccines recommended for children under age 7 were available without thimerosal or with only trace amounts.

But this year, in recommending for the first time that 6- to 23-month-old children routinely get flu shots, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) did not go on record in favor of a thimerosal-free formulation of the vaccine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Imus has his good points--thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Imus can be annoying
but when it comes to childrens' health, he is a PRINCE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have long though Santorum was one of the most evil men in DC
even before the Clinton impeachment. He is an extremely smug, arrogant, evil little asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, he's worse than that. And he'll likely be a GOP candidate for pres.
Edited on Mon Mar-07-05 10:54 AM by rkc3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That might be a good thing
People would see just how evil and hateful the GOP agenda truly is. He puts on a self-righteous act, but he has a hateful attitude on a lot of other issues besides gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Jesus must have told him that as long as he hates gay people
everything else he does will be forgiven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I agree with almost everything you wrote
but I think he's anextremely smug, arrogant, evil gaping asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. oh yes
With frothy discharge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mixxster Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Absolving people from liability is O.K. with Rick as long...
Edited on Mon Mar-07-05 11:43 AM by Mixxster
as it doesn't prevent him or the Mrs. from suing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Saw it----what a slimy little politician of the worst class is that
little creep. Am wondering----since PA has gone Dem, is there any chance they will dump this prick????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. was flamed saying the same thing as Imus
a few days ago...

decided to leave DU until seeing new rules..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC