Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An Open Letter to Dean Supporters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 11:38 PM
Original message
An Open Letter to Dean Supporters
Your man, and your campaign, is taking a lot of heat lately. It is coming from everywhere. A lot of it comes in the form of reasonable debate, a lot of it doesn't. Much, though not all, of the temperature rise can be boiled down to two facts. One: Dean is the front runner now, and with that status goes increased scrutiny. Two: Politics is an elimination sport. Sudden death time is approaching. No one wants to get knocked out of the playoffs.

I am not saying those two reasons explain why there are strongly felt differing opinions between the candidates and their suporters. There are as many reasons for that as there are people holding opinions. I am saying that the two above reasons represent the major changes in the overall situation from only a couple of months ago.

The candidates start laying it all on the line right about now because this run for the Presidency for almost all of them is the culmination of their entire life's work. They all believe in their own abilities passionately, that goes with the territory. Their staffs are professionally motivated to bring out all the biggest guns now because, not only do they in all likelyhood believe in their candidates, but their resume will reflect how good a job they did here in the biggest show in politics, and it will be largely graded by how well their candidate scores.

The Republicans are not the only ones who play hard ball politics. Maybe they throw at the head of batters a little more often, but everyone throws brush back pitches. It's like the National Hockey League without a penalty box. No goals are called back because of a penalty. If you score it counts, even if your team was off side.

Joe Trippi does not have a reputation as a Choir Boy. That is precisely one of the main reasons why he is so highly regarded as a Democratic Party Campaign Manager. A lot of people have confidence that he would be ready to face Karl Rowe in the Fall. There are a lot of people who do not like watching Professional Hockey. They don't enjoy seeinga hard body check into the boards. They prefer the grace of figure skating. What the candidates and their staff are all doing up there on the ice in New Hampshire in the few remaining weeks before the primary is not about figure skating.

The media for the most part starts keying in on the races right about now, before this it was mostly hard core political junkies and passsionate partisans who cared. Our collective interest doesn't sell many papers, or give a network much of a bump in the ratings. Controversy sells, and now is the time when the larger public is most likely to be interested in political controversy. Now is when both gotcha sound bite media coverage dominates the air waves, AND multi page newspaper investigatons into the inconsistencies of so and so's prior positions on issues make it into print.

As to us volunteer supporters of the people we believe will make a true difference, for both our own futures and the nation, well we kick it up several notches right about now also. Things are coming to a head. Emotions ramp up and become more raw. Retaliatory postings, back and forth, here at DU become more common. Everyone finds something to be angry about, and the effects of that anger make someone else angry. Virtually every one of the supporters of candidates other than Dean, and I suspect the other candidates themselves, would give their eye teeth to trade positions with you folks. I would gladly accept any up tic in trash thrown at me and my man if it came as the result of his having gained the position of clear favorite to win the nomination. I accept that that is the way it works. I don't expect human nature to change, and I don't expect the unwritten rules of fierce competitin to change either.

For what it's worth Clark gets a lot of fire also. You know that. A few of you light your full share of matches. There are things that some of us, people supporting various candidates, try to do from time to time to ground the emotions somewhat, and defuse the escalation of conflict between all of us who should be solidly united in our determination to dethrown George W. Bush. From time to time we may even drop the olive branch and throw a punch or two in what is perceived at the moment to be self defence. We can all try to do better, to be more civil, to be more fair. And even if we do try, sometimes we will fail at it. It is just the nature of the competitive Beast.

But don't lose sight of the ball. Don't be lured into a "bait and switch", like Bush substituting Hussein for Bin Laden as the gravest threat. Don't replace Bush with Clark, Kerry, or Gephardt, or any of their supporters. Obviously I say the same to Clark supporters about Dean and the rest. Intellectually I think we all know better, but emotions are another thing completely. Pretty soon, a matter of a few short months at most, and there will only be one Democrat running to replace George Bush. That Democrat will either beat George Bush or we will face four more years of Bush's threat to our Democracy.

People in the Dean campaign understand more than most the power of positive thinking, of solidarity and unity of purpose The Dean campaign may have more grass roots activists right now than anyone else, but you don't have all of them, and everyone will be needed to defeat Bush. It will not be easy to unseat his Junta. We will all need to FEEL like we are on the same team come September, not merely "know" it. Don't burn bridges. I say that to fellow Clark supporters also. Don't burn bridges. We will need those to tie us together very soon. I am not naive enogh to thnk we can avoid all real anger between us over the next few months, but see it for what it is a product of, temporary righteous pasions, and don't draw sweeping conclusions from it. We all have much more in common than what divides us.

If the overwhelming majority of us believe that peace is still possibly between the Palestianians and Israel after all that has happened there over the long decades, we surely can get past the bitterness that flares up during this intense time of intra mural Democratic competition. The overwhelming majority of all of us here are very sincere about our convictions and concerns, despite some very strong differences between us. Those differences have always existed in the large coalition that makes up the National Democratic Party. When push comes to shove we count on Joe Liebermans vote in the Senate on dozens of issues each year. When Democratic Party unity fractures, the Republicans win. It is that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, but
Well, actually, yeah. I'd just like to add this thing I've been sticking into a lot of threads tonight

to wit:

There are less than 1000 hours left until the ball drops.

We aren't going to convince anyone else on DU to sign up with our guy, not Dean supporters, not Kerry supporters, not anyone.

It really isn't worth the effort to reply to the old tried and true anti-Clark crap, whether its Pristina or Waco or whatever.

Just shut it down and let's move on.

We've got an election to win and it isn't going to get won here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree... it's not worth replying to the anti-clark or anti-dean crap....
(I think Dean and Clark both bear the brunt of it)and that is why I backed off posting recently. I support Dean 1st, Clark 2nd, and I am tired of seeing the same BS posted over and over about both of them. I have only been registered for about 2 months, and only been actively posting about a month, and already *I* am sick of the redundant attacks. I can't imagine how sick of it the long-time posters must be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cavebat2000 Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I agree!
No longer will I reply to anti-candidate posts. Will anyone else take that pledge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. How about this as a friendly amendment
If I can't reply thoughtfully I won't reply. Sometimes I do want to add somtthing solid to the debate, like a link to a different source of information or whatever. When confronted by flamebait, If I can't help cool down the tone of debate and add something useful to it, I will ignore it. If you see me slipping please let me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh man, are YOU barking up the wrong tree.

I haven't worked for years to unseat that horror called George W Bush just to replace him with version 2.0 in Joe Lieberman.

I haven't seen my countrymen come back in pieces, or in "transfer tubes", just so we can have more wars on Arab countries after tacit Likkudist approval is given to Joe Lieberman.

I'll make this brief. I'll take molten lead up my ass before I vote for Joe Fucking Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. For the Record
Lieberman is my number 9 out of the 9 choices we have in the Primaries. My point was that the Democratic Party gets to block racist appointments to the Supreme Court or whatever only by calling in every vote we can get to uphold fillisbusters and the like. We can not afford purer than thou inclusion tests at the moment. We already lost too many two vote decisions in Congress as it is.

I was going to an extreme to make a point. Joe Lieberman is my extreme case in point, definately NOT my choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. nice post,
I certianly think we are united versus George W. Bush. We MUST keep that unity. That unity alone will succeed when the time comes in November. We have to also remember that the democratic base can't do it alone, we'll need some help from the middle and the swings. We can't forget them.

There will be Dean, and the ABD candidate, and that will be a big fracture. However, the effects of that are unpredictable. If we stick to our unity v. George W. Bush, and appease a few swings while carefully targetting our states, the general election won't be a problem.

United we stand against this pResident!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Nice letter, but i'm not a damn bit worried about our unity
Honestly, as hard as we're fighting each other, the bottom line has never been clearer: getting rid of the maladministration. I'm old enough to have been thru these squabbles four or five times. I remember in 1984 wondering how Hart & Jackson people could ever support Mondale (yet I was a Hart guy wondering that). In 1992 I remember Tsongas people saying they'd never vote for Clinton and Clintonistas returning the compliment.

That's all poop after the convention, however. I'd bet the last dime from my last paycheck that Dean folks will support Clark, Clark folks will support Gephardt, and so forth. The pleas for unity are nice, but won't be needed after Boston. The real needs are to (1) tell the truth on Bush, (2) cover the political center, and (3) turn out the base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. This has been a politics as unusual year.
I admit that I still have some concerns. I am with you in that I don't have a concern about the clear majority of the supporters for all the candidates, I think we will react to the Fall exactly as you predict.

Here is the basis for my remaining concern. First politics has been accelerated. You spoke of years past. The National Convention almost always fosters a spirit of unity that carries us into the Fall campaign, but nowadays the Presidential campaign will be perking along at close to full speed throughout the Summer before the Convention. The accelerated pace of campaigning is reflected in the bunching up of primaries now early in the year. Republican money looms ever larger, and people power has to be fully engaged very early on in order to offset that. The Democratic party can't really afford to miss a beat this year. If you want to revisit the past, I still remember Humphrey's campaign, which did not jell quickly enough after our Democratic civil wars. Humphrey was closing the gap with Nixon towards the end but just ran out of time.

Second, the nature of Dean's campaign, and to a slightly lesser extent of Clark's, involves energizing the Party by bringing in new blood. That is great, it really is great. Obviously both campaigns also have lots of folks in them who have been through all of this many times before, but we are in politics as unusual. I am afraid that, if we are not careful, some of the people who are newly engaged in this political process will be disgusted by it enough that they will be slow to throw themselves into organizing for a candidate other than the one they originally supported. Some never will. While that happens some every election, this election could be worse than average in that regard. I believe that the freshness and vitality of Dean's movement is critical for the success of the Democratic Party.

There is an excellent chance thet Dean will win the nomination and their passion won't skip a beat. Then people like me will be in the position of urging other Clark supporters to give their all to Dean without hesitation. But if Dean loses the nomination I worry about the sentiment I hear expressed from time to time that implies that the only way Dean can lose is if the "party machine", code word DLC, stole the Election, shades of Florida 2000. That's why I started this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC