this is a very interesting read for those who have not seen it.
It is Jeff Gannon chatting on free republic about the subpoena re. the Plame investigation.. it was posted on 03/09/2004..
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1093819/postsan example from the thread:
I do indeed. So talking about a document, that no government agency confirms even exists, is a crime?
23 posted on 03/09/2004 8:59:43 AM PST by Jeff Gannon (Listen to my radio show "Jeff Gannon's Washington" on www.RIGHTALK.com)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Jeff Gannon
Not necessarily, but you claimed to be ignorant as to why you might be subpoenaed in this investigation. That is simply not true.
It's clear that the method by which you obtained the information you referenced in your interview with Wilson could be material in an on going investigation. Who gave you the information? Who told you about the memo? Where did you learn about the memo? That is all relevant if in fact the memo proves to be a forgery, don't you think?
24 posted on 03/09/2004 9:08:43 AM PST by JohnGalt (What tale will serve me here among Mine angry and defrauded young? -- R. Kipling)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies >