Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pay no attention to the naked gay conservative male prostitute in the WH!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:37 PM
Original message
Pay no attention to the naked gay conservative male prostitute in the WH!
A GREAT READ from Digby with comments from Jonah Goldberg plus the background on Issikoff/Blue dress where he puts in all into context (Thanks to Buzzflash for the link)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM DIGBY

Paraphrasing a comment I read somewhere yesterday (apologies to the author) "pay no attention to the naked gay conservative male prostitute sitting in the middle of the family values white house living room." Goldberg affects a jocular dismissiveness for a reason. He knows what a real story is and he knows how they work. And he is trivializing this one because it is actually quite dangerous.

Meanwhile, on the left we have much handwringing by commenters over this not being a "gay" story and how we should concentrate on the national security angle and how it's really about access etc, etc. We too are ignoring the naked, gay conservative prostitute in the midde of the family values white house living room. And this is where they get us.

Perhaps it would be instructive to take another little trip down memory lane. Jonah knows very well what a real story is because he was up to his ears in one of the biggest political sex scandals in history. From Michael Isifkoff's award winning MSM articles on the Lewinsky affair:

More of this great read for background....:-)'s ENJOY....

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2005_02_13_digbysblog_archive.html#110849435828569255
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Best Title Ever
love it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I can't take credit...it was "Buzzflash" who pulled it out...but it does
grab one's attention for the "truth" of the whole damned thing, doesn't it? :D or :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
36. Excuses
The title is truthful, but one republican I "discussed" this with shouted, "that's between him and God!"
Of course, it's always different if it's a liberal or democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. They certainly do know its a real story
so THEY are doing their damndest to ensure that bush's ignorant base is not exposed to it. I'm totally baffled that the religious right is not marching in front of the white house with pitchforks. Naked homosexual prostitute and not a peep from those holier than us? Wow! I guess those people really are tolerant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. corporate media refuse to give it time...wonder why
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zeke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Oh, Because...
The story will destroy Bush Inc.,
and the GOP, and the GOP hold over
the red middle America states,
forever giving Democrats total
control of the USA.

Yeah, that's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's all because
Bush is a God fearing Christian man and us democrats are so evil and immoral (note sarcasm). :eyes: You know good and well if this was a democratic government they'd be kicking and screaming and crying and it'd be all over the news. What a load of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. He also calls it the "Manchurian Beefcake Story" and rails about
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 02:10 PM by KoKo01
how we should be fighting back like the Repugs do on this one. I agree with him. We have too many Dem "hand wringers" who get caught up in the "Victim" thing which is what Kurtz and Blitzer set the stage for when they did the first report on this. We let those two set the agenda and the Goldbergs and the rest sit back and laugh it all off while they attack "Liberal Bloggers" ignoring that the "Conservative Bloggers" have taken down more folks than Liberal Bloggers would even be able to get a chance to.

But, it's perfect Rovian/Gingrich tactics. And damned if it doesn't work every time. If not for Louise Slaughter and John Conyers our Reps would still be whispering in the back room and wringing their hands saying "whatever shall we do? ...we don't want to call too much attention to this sex angle do we? It might backfire...oh woe is me." (my interpretation of what's going on)

So...either some Dems are involved in this...so they don't want to speak up or we still haven't learned how to jump on a National Security Story and play it to wherever it goes...and if it leads into Dem Beds as well as Repug's it's time to find out the truth! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. I agree
the Dems shouldn't worry about GOP attempts to smear them as homophobic---
They are too worried they will offend anyone by coming out and saying in clear english that the Bush administration hired a homosexual male pornographer and prostitute to interfere with Press Conferences
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HaloKitty Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Argh, he's the new Teflon President...
Nomatter how big the story, it's brushed off by the administration and the media as no big deal. Or worse, a sure sign we libs and the bloggers are the REAL danger in America.

And the fact is, whatever Jeff the Bulldog's sexual proclivities, he's a PROSTITUTE. Worse, he's a man, who has sex with men, then spews hate about gay men. He is no victim in this, and the dems can't be afraid to call a spade a spade. Gay, straight, or whatever, the guy is scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Hi HaloKitty!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. He seems to have taken it far beyond teflon
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 04:14 PM by donheld
I think the bastard could kill a child on national TV and 59 million Merikans would ignore it.


Welcome to DU HaloKitty :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
46. at least the Republican hardcore would
many of those 59 million were swing voters who made up their mind based on bad intel from the lame ass media at the last minute.

But among them are real hardcores who will vote for the most RW candidate they can find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
45. good point
he has sex with men, for money, floods the internet with homosexual pornography and then bitches that Kerry is too tolerant on gays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callboy Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. When's the lid coming off this badboy???
Simmering over the pot already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bethany Rockafella Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. How can you pay no attention to eight and a half inches of elephant?
In the flesh, so to speak. ;-) This is directed to the Democrats and the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcon007 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. If I were Governor Dean.....
I believe I would huddle with Barney Frank and put it like this, "Barney, you are a patriot and a very intelligent, gay man. I need you to speak up about the hypocrisy of the White House on the Jeff Gannon story."
Let people say what they will about Barney Frank....when he speaks, people listen. No one can deny his openness concerning his own sexual orientation, but his worth to me as a 50ish straight man is his honesty, his compassion for the little guy and, damn it, I've never seen him back down from a fight.
Am I off base here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Femme Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Dean
Has anyone actually sent Howard Dean the Gannon information that is being dug up and requested that this is a top priority to be looked into?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. Barney Frank is perhaps not the best spokesperson on this.
There is a story that a man who was living at Frank's residence was turning some tricks on the side. Don't know if true, but perhaps there would be another spokesperson.....

And there lies part of the problem -- the entire Senate and most of the House probably lives in a glass house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
47. You are right on the mark about Barney's compassion and energy
He is a mensch!!!!!!! Always on the side of the poor, the defenseless, the elderly, the powerless...Barney is a helluva fellah!

I especially like his command of facts--he has a mind like a steel trap, damn near TOTAL recall, and he can slap the crap out of anyone trying to shove him during interviews ("Excuse me for talking while you were interrupting me" is CLASSIC Barney). He is one tough sonofabitch when he needs to be, and you are right, he DOES NOT BACK DOWN.

The problem with asking Barney to front for this issue is that the right will bring up his little difficulty many years back, where he was having a relationship with a live-in guy who was a callboy, and who ran his biz out of Barney's house. Rep. Studds was caught up in a contemporaneous imbroglio due to a relationship with a House page. The right would use that to try to muddy the waters, so it may not be helpful. If asked though, I am sure that he would let them have it with both barrels. but he might not be the best guy to have on point over this matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. And then there's the whole lying stuff...
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 03:00 PM by Hissyspit
Telling lies was sure against MY family's values. I consider a media plant a big whopper, not just a varient on strategy. Then there's Jeff's lies and McClellan's lies, etc.

I would have gotten whupped with a belt as a kid for telling those kind of lies. Oh, wait, maybe Jeff actually likes that kind of thing.

Guess if you're gonna lie, lie big.:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PapaJoe Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. Jeff's whitehouse connection
just heard something on the Randi Rhodes show about somebody from GOPUSA is married to somebody in Andy Card's staff. know anything about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reichstag911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. Go to "Hiding in Plain Sight..." at...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Priceless title! Spot on PERFECT!
HEY Congressional Democrats!!!!!! Are you listening???

<snip>It might just force some of these chickenshit libertarians and GOP urbanites to show their true colors and get some GOP parents and siblings of gay people to face up to what they are doing. Can anyone believe that there is no value in showing the country that many of the highest level Republicans in the Bush Administration are actually quite tolerant of gays? Doesn't that move our agenda forward?

I don't believe that we advance the cause of gay rights by allowing the right to have it both ways, which they clearly do. We have a tittilating tabloid story, replete with nude pictures and prostitution, that illustrates the fact that they are merely pandering to the religious right on this issue. It would be too bad if we are too squeamish to pursue it because that is exactly what the other side is counting on.

Finally, the biggest reason to pursue this story is because we are creating a terrible moral hazard if we don't. The Republicans have no incentive to stop the politics of personal destruction if we don't hold them to their own standards and they continue to be rewarded. Pitchers, batters and Republicans understand this instinctively. So should we. <snip>


Great article. If only our politicians would read it. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Manchurian Beefcakes--Is that like a cartoon?
Because the only reason I can think of for why Hot Military Stud Jeff Gannon is being swept under the rug is that he's a flesh-and-blood naked gay conservative male prostitute sitting in the middle of the family values white house living room, instead of being some friend of friend of an animated cartoon character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. I've been vindicated.
I posted yesterday on Will Pitt's thread/poll asking what was the most important part of the Gannon/Guckert story to pursue.

I said the gay prostitute issue should be mined for all it's worth because it's the thread that can potentially unravel the whole fetid swamp that is the Bush WH.

At the time, I think the sex angle was running dead last as something to be pursued, and I couldn't figure out why I, a grandmother, heard a little voice inside me saying, "Go with the sex!".

Well, if you've read what Digby has to say, be sure to scroll down and click on Rude Pundit's link. As Digby says, "Rude Pundit gets it right." Well said!

snip>

We are draining away law and ethics through the "extraordinary renditions" of "terror suspects," as well as our own torturing. Like city dwellers who can sleep through sirens, car alarms, and street construction, we just tune it all out. But it'll crash, finally. Then we'll think, oh, shit, should've killed those termites.

You may ask how these things are connected, Guckert and Guantanamo (and elsewhere), other than through the act of sodomy. All of one's lies are entangled, ultimately. Al Capone couldn't be caught on a murder rap. Instead, the government nailed him and destroyed him because of tax evasion. If what finally brings down the Bush administration is the revelation of a secret cabal of homosexuals trying desperately to stay in the closet, then so be it.


http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2005/02/why-gannonguckert-matters-rude-version.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. you said it, truth to power.
here Clinton balanced the budget and kept the peace for 8 years, and was the greatest president this country has had since FDR, yet what do people remember? the blow job.

Had Jeff been wearing the blue dress, they definitely would have removed Clinton from office, no doubt about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. While the story exposes the hypocrites - I don't think it helps the cause
of gays - if the goal is to bring about more acceptance.

If anything - this Gannon/Gerkurt guy would drive conservatives into just wanting more controls... with the objective of stuffing the Gannon/Gerkurts of the world back into the closet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Well think of it this way...
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 04:30 PM by KoKo01
If she was a Female Prostitute who had advertised for "tricks" with the Military Females, had testimonials about her from sources claiming they worked for the Pentagon and posed with legs spread and urinating and whatever else Gurket had photo's of himself doing, do you think "NOW" or "Emily's List" would complain that the shock of it might push women back to the time when they couldn't vote? Do you think the Press would back off of that one?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'm sure
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 04:40 PM by bloom
that if this happened on the Dems watch - that it would be on the news 24/7.

I expect that there can be gains from the standpoint of exposing Republicans as being ridiculous.

I just don't think it necessarily helps out gays, that's all. Not that gays necessarily would want to shirk from the story - I just don't see it helping as far as being something like "oh, look - we're all one big, happy family with gay prostitutes in the living room of the White House."



P.S. I was esp. responding to this:

"It might just force some of these chickenshit libertarians and GOP urbanites to show their true colors and get some GOP parents and siblings of gay people to face up to what they are doing. Can anyone believe that there is no value in showing the country that many of the highest level Republicans in the Bush Administration are actually quite tolerant of gays? Doesn't that move our agenda forward? "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Oh...I missed that post...
must have been a "visitor." If you understand what I mean.

There's an excellent post by "Chookie" somewhere here on DU that says maybe it isn't about Gay's or homosexuality, but about "Power Dominance." And that neither Gannon nor his clients may see themselves as Gay in the traditional sense, but the psychosocial Power Dominance is what turns them on. (sorry..I'm not quoting the post accurately). Anyway it's an interesting way to look at Gannon/Gurket and what might be going on that got him into the White House.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
38. How do you think a self loathing male PROSTITUTE whoring
for the Rabid Radical Right Wing Nuts is supposed to help the Gay Agenda? It is not about Gay it is about hypocrisy and Prostitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. The suggested Dem "come back" for this is priceless, and spot on!!
"When the wingnuts complain about how we hate gays, just say "No I don't. And clearly, neither do you. But James Dobson does. Let's go have a chat with him, ok?"

When/if we get this type of framing in front of Dean and the Dems, they'll be able to run with it.

The only thing I believe might be holding them back from attacking right now (aside from the fact that some high profile Dems may eventually be connected to Gannon 'trists' ) is the fact they don't know how to spin anything to their advantage for fear of pissing off their base. THIS COME BACK gives them the way around it.

And we need more, better, and hopefully HUMOROUS comebacks that will catch on....in other words, we need some good writers to take the place of some of those high-paid loser consultants that are about to be given the boot.

Great thread, KoKo! Thanks for posting!!

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. All fine and dandy...............
but when the MSM is totally in control of the GOP it gives us very few ways to get ANY message out to the American people, let alone a message that will shatter their illusions of the bush White House.

If someone can explain to me how we're to distribute this story in a coherent fashion to the American public, I'm all ears. What 'angle' of the story to use for the greatest impact is rendered moot until then. If nobody will report the story, nobody's going to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Might want to check reader's letters in the am to the WaPo.
If they publish a group, it will be instructive. If they don't, that will also be instructive.

The press still has to pretend they are responsive to readers. Puts them in an interesting position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Don't count on more than a cryptic double entendre or two, if that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. Sadly, corporate media will do just that. And don't be surprised
if Jeff has an unfortunate accident in the very near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callboy Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. I'm trying not to look!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. LOL's but look at what? My post or something else?
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. NO MORE PACK-O-DERMS IN THE WHITE HOUSE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v3.0
==================



This week is our first quarter 2005 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend almost entirely
on donations from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for
your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
35. Man I can't wait to see the dirt that gets dug up after Chimp resigns! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dissent Is Patriotic Donating Member (793 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
37. This heading is so damn funny!
Thanks for making me laugh numerous times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
39. Kick!
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 10:45 PM by calimary
BTW - Catherine Crier was actually covering it on Court TV, and evidently asking all the correct questions:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1600445

So, at the moment, it's Olbermann and Crier so far.

And ... BTW part two ... where IS Isikoff these days, anyway? Why isn't he hounding this one, 'eh? What's he afraid of? Just asking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
40. Yes, the gay angle is truly a scandal
This whole thing is illegal.

Running a prostitution ring is against the law in this country (except for Nevada). I won't debate prostitution here, but I will say that this is a felony offense. And it is treated as a more serious crime than raiding pension funds.

This is at the core of the "Moral Majority". They are nothing but a bunch of lying perverts who are trying to sell religious snake oil. And the torture connection: they are a bunch of sadists.

If the MSM could unravel this, not like the Clinton debacle, but as a solid and serious news item, then this could add up to the Bush downfall.

He may have won the election through fear tactics and phony ideals (but exit polls show that he didn't even win at all), but his legacy of total crime will catch up and take him down. He has screwed over nearly every group of his voting constituency in the second term of office, and only after 3 1/2 months of staying in office. If his policies get too much more out there, the moderate GOP will shut him down in Congress and/or an impeachment will be presented with him facing a serious possibility of the impeachment being carried out. He will never step down, but he may be forced out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. It is not the fact that he is gay...it is the male prostitution thing
There are a lot of gay journalists.

Very few are also male prostitutes who get special access to the WH with no credentials
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. That and the utter hypocrisy that Repukes operate under DAILY...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC