Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Charles Schwab behind privatizing Social Security?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:13 PM
Original message
Charles Schwab behind privatizing Social Security?
On Hardball tonight, the revelation that Charles Schwab is good friends with the dimwit...and Schwab is being credited with the idea and the push to privatize Social Security for investment in the stock market.

So -

If you have a Charles Schwab account, CLOSE IT, and be sure to let them know why - as I am in the process of doing.
Switch to one of the $7 or $10 traders. You have the right to have your stocks physicaly sent to you or to have them switched to another trader, (I used to switch them for free, don't know now if Schwab charges for the switch now).

Schwab is too expensive per trade anyway...it's not enough for him to rob traders individually - he'd rather do it on a big scale....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. He was the one behind
the no tax on dividends too. Actually the Social Security plan of theirs has been in the works for decades, nothing new. They hate the program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I knew that Wall Street was behind it
It sounded like a gift to brokers. Now we know. Just another example of corporate welfare at the expense of taxpayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not so fast
Some support it. Many oppose it.

Do you think Morgan, Goldman and Lehman really want to administer those $500 accounts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No but I doubt they would have to
There will be some minimum amount necessary to invest. The companies that do 401Ks and the non-profit's equivalent are the ones who will want these accounts. They're set up for handling smaller accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. 100 million of them?
And what about the potential liability?

And the profit potential of "conservative accounts" with government restrictions on fees?

Walmart not Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. If they can charge high enough fees, yes.
I read that CALPERS costs 18 cents per $100 in assets to manage because it's so large. If you add zeros to the sizes of the accounts, you don't have to add zeros to the number of people you hire to manage the money, or the size of the building you need for an HQ.

A 401K plan, however, costs something like $2.35 in management fees. The trades are smaller, buy you still have to pay someone to handle them.

That twelve time difference in cost of management constittutes the profit that equities brokers would love to see. Of course they'd love to manage all those small accounts, so long as they get to charge per-transaction fees that make handling those accounts lucrative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Argh!! My 401K plan is through Schwab
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 08:19 PM by rox63
Since * is determined to destroy social security, I'm going to need some sort of retirement fund. And my employer matches some of my contributions. What to do???

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Keep it
You do need a retirement plan afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Do research, find a better plan, and petition your employer to move their
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 11:03 AM by AP
401 plan to the better broker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Makes horribly perfect Do$$ars & Cent$!
Of course! The Schwab's of Wall Street would love nothing more, though I did read just last week that a few on WS don't want their reputations marred by this, as I dare say I blame them!

What greed, and so arrogant at that!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Color me shocked.
Not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. i think he may the first one to admit that
i've noticed how quiet wall street has been on this issue----they stand to make $$$$$$$$ handling these accounts and eventually looting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Enron executives may get jobs now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Charles Schwab is good friends with the dimwit<<
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 08:46 PM by 4MoronicYears
And Cheney was a farking cheerleader for none other than Arthur Andersen. True that.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2119981.stm
In another development, it has emerged that Mr Cheney took part in a promotional video for the disgraced accounting firm Andersen.

The lawsuit was filed at a court in Dallas, Texas, where Halliburton is based.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. This surprises you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. Insert the word "duh"
Ya think Chuck would make money on privitizing Social Security?

Shit...they already are making the brochures and training manuals for the staff for this crap...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC