Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We need OUR OWN Gannon -- Help me with this idea !

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 08:47 AM
Original message
We need OUR OWN Gannon -- Help me with this idea !
Now,I know nothing, as I should, about how you become a press corps member (I mean for everyone except Gannon) but wouldn't this be a golden opportunity for us to get someone similar from our side -- a progressive internet news site personality to get credentials and hopefully be able to ask the questions that the silent, whimpy, MSM will not?

How could they deny this, given the way they embraced Gannon?

Maybe, just maybe, we could somehow get to ask the truth of this evil empire??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is the opposite of Gannon
We already have this, and his name is Dan Rather.

Getting in to the White House will be nearly impossible. And getting to ask the pResident any useful question is not allowed in their controlled little world.

This comes down to one of two things. Either the MSM gets a revolution from within, and starts asking the tough questions, or people like us just go around the media, and gain credibility by finding solid news items.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. For this to work...
you have to believe that the * and his ilk, are speaking the truth that they were not complicit in getting gannon in there, which is BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. No, I believe he's a plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Randi Rhodes's Producer applied...
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 08:59 AM by itzamirakul
and she has a Master's Degree in Journalism from Columbia University and has worked for several LEGITIMATE news organizations and she was refused a press pass for the White House Press Conferences.

Funny, isn't it, that the Porn guy got to ask Bush questions when a qualified journalist like Helen Thompson has been relegated to Siberia in the Press Room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. she needs to start screaming - now, before the story goes away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal43110 Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. When?
Do you know about when she applied and was rejected? I mean, was it a long time ago? Or within the last 2 years, the timeframe that Gannon was planted/allowed in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. She applied this past week AFTER
the Gannon debacle.

Randi was sort of laughing/complaining that she has to share an office with her producers and technicians while Al and Katherine have their own private offices and how hard it is for her to concentrate. Randi said that while she was trying to read, she kept hearing the producer (I forgot her name-sorry) calling the White House over and over and over about getting the Press Pass.

Randi talked for quite awhile about how wrong it was for a fake journalist to get into the White House Press Corps when legitimate journalists like her producer are refused/rejected.

I don't know if it is possible to get a transcript of Randi's show but it was reported yesterday, Friday, Feb. 11, 2005, on air. I heard it with my own two ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. Itzamirakul -- Hope you don't mind I quoted you on this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Not at all!
In fact, I just left your other thread where I found that you had linked to this story and I was very pleased. I followed the link and came back here.:) The more people who read this stuff and see what is going on - the better.

Thnaks for sharing it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Correction. We need our own Monica. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1democracy Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not me! There are limits for the disgust-o-meter to withstand...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. For all we know, Guckert/Gannon IS. nt (edit: typing)
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 09:37 AM by blondeatlast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. But Monica had thong underwear, not tighty-whiteys...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Not funny...sorry...
What is the point in a Democrat bringing up Monica on a thread like this?

Oh, well, some folks' sense of humor just doesn't tickle my funny bone.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I guess my point, if there was one, is that the MSM doesn't care
how many people you kill, but a little sex always gets their attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. What are you saying? Interesting ! That he's one of us??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Better yet
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 10:12 AM by Jamastiene
A gay lover comes out of nowhere telling intimate details on what kind of romantic lover Jerry Falwell is. Or better yet, for our sakes in '08, Jeb Bush's male lover comes out with all the sordid details. In the Falwell case, the more he tries to deny it the gayer he'll look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. But we already know who Jeb's male lover is
This horrid drag queen....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. She's awful
isn't she? That would be THE story to tell. Like she was once a man then had sex reassignment surgery...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. Personally, I find such a suggestion,...repulsive!!
Gannon was a government-produced, paid propagandist on behalf of a radical right-wing.

We have more honor and integrity than that and to suggest we create our own "Gannon" is just, plain repulsive to me.

We have "the facts" and a genuine interest in our people's future on our side. We cannot possibly be compared to a "Gannon". x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. post #13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. There is an opportunity here to protest .
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 10:25 AM by higher class
We could demand equal treatment. We could bang on doors metaphorically by raising our voice in demand.

A list of people could be submitted with the WH selecting one. NONE have to be like Gannon - weakly qualified, used, set up, and with a colorful sideline. We would need our person to be 100% qualified with a degree in journalism or long experience reporting politics and in the employ of or the head of a news organization.

If Gannon had been a Dem during the Clinton admin...every hothead Republican would be on every show hour shouting and screaming.

At least two of our Washington Representatives have raised their voice - diplomatically, and within our/their judicial rights, and are subsequently waiting for a response from the administration.

This is an opportunity to justifiably and responsibly drawing attention to the lopsided political manuevering by demanding balance.

In the end, this WH will revert to the standards for admission - but why let them claim that they took responsibility for getting it straightened out?

Fight them politically - legally and professionally.

That is what standing up means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. We need our own fake troop gay prostitute?
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 10:35 AM by Joanne98
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. NO ! I am suggesting, Like Higher Class, to use this episode
as a vehicle, bully pulpit, to force them to allow a much more qualified (that could be most of the population)internet-based progressive to get credentials. Make a big sqwack. Compare our candidate to Gannon and demand admittance. This may be a first step to getting ourselves heard. 2nd step -- figuring out how to get them to call upon this person to ask a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC