Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The New Confederacy: wait, this is a joke, right?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
latteromden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 01:48 AM
Original message
The New Confederacy: wait, this is a joke, right?
Edited on Thu Feb-10-05 01:51 AM by latteromden
I honestly don't know.

http://www.newconfederacy.com/

If it IS a joke, quite an elaborate Constitution they've got there.

If not, "The right of the individual to keep and bear arms, ammunition, transportation, and weapons of war, for the purposes of defense of self, household, community, enterprise, State, Nation, or Republic, shall be sacrosanct, as shall the right to such defense, and no Government, corporation, artificial entity, or private individual shall infringe upon these rights, nor shall any Government regulate, tax, impede, prohibit, survey, or in any other manner interfere in the free possession, transport, import, export, sale, or keeping of arms, ammunition, transportation or devices or publications involved in maintaining these rights." And Canada, as part of the Confederacy.

*confused*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. no it ain't a joke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. No, not a joke, you hear people down here in NC talk about it
They hate the North yet today. they wear the confederate flag as a symbol of their country.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Then I hope they don't vote
If they think they're still citizens of the "CSA" (that died in 1865) then they shouldn't be voting in American elections.

Hey... there's one way of picking off a few "red states".

These fuckwads are so fond of loyalty oaths? Make them take one before they can vote. If they believe in some fucking "confederacy", then they don't. Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charon Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Don't Vote
They do vote, that is why all of the old Confederate States are currently "Red" states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not only ain't it no joke...
there are plenty of other groups out there with plans at least as "interesting."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well there won't be
any Canada as part of their 'confederacy'

12 Alberta crazies do not a nation make. Most Albertans wouldn't dream of leaving Canada, and preferred Kerry to Bush. And BC isn't called Lotusland for nothing.

We'll kick their ass back to Dixie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let the idiots secede. Fewer red states, we can win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. That's sad.
I'm a 2nd Amendment supporter, but that's ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eriffle Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. read the site
they aren't completely crazy. their constitution forbids slavery and also forbids the formation of a state religion as well as any discrimination against anyone on the ground of religion. Also, No law shall be used to indict a defendant on the basis of his thoughts or his political or religious beliefs. it also requires all elections to use paper ballots to be kept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latteromden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. True. I thought that the rights cannot be denied based on religion was a
good thought.

But it seems like they're drawing random lines through the US and Canada to make the "New Confederate States!!". It's a bit odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. Nope, unfortunately not a joke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGirl7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. According to the site, I live in another country(New York)...
LMAO!!!!!! this is too funny...the sad thing is that it isn't a joke...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. Interesting
I like this provision of their Constitution:

"All elections under the Confederate States shall require a paper ballot, said ballots to be preserved for the entirety of the longest term of office voted upon."

They also have a clause that says "Government shall not invade the privacy of any individual, nor survey him, without due process of law to which he is entitled to be informed."

And then there is this: "Every individual's body, life, labor, ideas, thoughts, and possessions that the individual has lawfully created or acquired are that individual's property. Every individual has the inherent right of the ownership, non-coercive acquisition, and use of property."

Don't those permit abortion?

And wouldn't this allow people to use marijuana and to take heroin for pain: "The right of the individual to medicate themself for illness, malady or health, as well as the right to refuse medication, shall not be infringed."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. I don't think I'd be too worried about this
there are only 227 signatures on their constitution. http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?doicsa03
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC