Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was This Iraqi Election Just A Cooked-Up Bush Ploy To Get Re-Elected?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 12:17 PM
Original message
Was This Iraqi Election Just A Cooked-Up Bush Ploy To Get Re-Elected?
The results are not at all surprising. Given the opportunity the Iraqis have empowered a fundamentalist theocracy very much in line with their spiritual allies in Iran, complete with the guidnace and blessings of a Grand Ayatollah.

That the media hasn't covered this development for what it was, an electoral uprising by Iraq's Shi'ite pro-Iran majority against the both the U.S. and Western influence in general, is hardly surprising. What is surprising is that the Bush administration gave no indication that they knew this was at least a possibility. As devastating a result as what we are seeing now with the Iraqi vote count should have at least been discussed as something that might happen.

There is one explanation, however. In the 2004 US election the Iraq War was, of course, a huge issue. Casualties were increasing every month, and many were beginning to question what it was we were doing there. Bush needed to sieze upon a bold initiative in order to once again control the debate on this issue.

My question is this: Did the Bush administration cook up the Iraqi election for reasons of domestic political expediancy? In my opinion they certainly must have had a pretty good idea that the victor there could be Grand Ayatollah Ali al Sistani, and that such a development would be devastating for our interests in the region while strengthening those of our decades old foe Iran.

Did Bush sacrifice American interests by cooking up an Iraq election in order to improve his own political fortunes in 2004?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chico Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. "As devastating a result as what we are seeing now "
Why is the Iraqi election a devastating result? That's democracy, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Iraq Falling Under An Iranian Suzerainty...
...is a very good possibility as a result of this election. Avoiding such a thing has been a goal of U.S. foreign policy for decades. Bush turned all of that on its head and gave Iran the chance to bring Iraq's Shi'ite population under their control, something Tehran has wanted since the fall of the Shah.

Ronald Reagan must be rollling in his grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoBear Donating Member (781 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely!
Everything they do is aimed at being in power. They have no concern for us poor common critters--it's the "I've got mine, screw you" attitude that someone else mentioned this morning (and for which we can thank Ronald Ray-gun and the repugnicants).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gee, wouldn't that be a shocker?
And all of a sudden the fundamentalists have realized he's not really going after Roe vs. Wade, the red state farmers have realized he's cutting money in the budget earmarked for them, police departments - our first line of defense in the war on terror - are losing money, and on, and on, and on. He would've guaranteed to have all our houses painted on the government if it would have bought him some votes. As for the Iraqi election, I think the whole Iraq war might have been an election ploy. Prior to his first day in office he was gunning for Iraq and from Rove's perspective that was a good thing because war presidents usually win a second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. The timing is wrong. 9-11 appears to have been the key event.
For the first time, I do wonder if there was administration involvement in that event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. I Agree. It Delayed The Inevitable Clash With The Shi’ite Clerics
until after the US election. Our Leader wanted nothing to do with these elections initially. But faced with both a Sunni and Shi’ite uprising beginning in March, Our Leader bought off the Shi’ite clerics by acquiescing to their demands for election.

That leads to the question, why didn’t Our Leader just call off the election on some phony pretense after reselection? The two answers I come up with are quite unsettling since they indicate that Our Leader may, for the first time, be is losing his grasp of the situation:

- The Sunni uprising is holding it’s own against Our Leader’s legions, thus the Shi’ite must continue to be placated.
- Our Leader and his counselors really thought that their hand-picked Quisling, Allawi, would garner enough of the votes to keep him in a position of power to continue in Our Leader’s service.

Either way, the longer Our Leader’s legions remain in Iraqnam, the closer they come to open conflict with the greater Shi’ite community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC