Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quick! attack more dem senators! Chimp is creating a dictatorship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:25 PM
Original message
Quick! attack more dem senators! Chimp is creating a dictatorship
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 11:26 PM by John_H
by executive action. Perhaps some DUers took time out from going after Obama to read the WP article about chimp radically changing civil service accross the federal government.

In case not, Chimp will take away all regular payraises and job security, basing them instead uopn evaluations by...you guessed it...Republican patronage workers. What this means is that every federal employee will in effect be a political appointee of the president.

What this also means is that every federal empoloyee will have to tow the GOP line (since every career civil servant must answer to a political appointee)or lose pay, move to ankorage, or get fired. Under the current system political appointees have very little way to coherce civil servants into doing their bidding. And that's a good thing for a host of reasons. Think chimp implements his agenda aggressively now? Wait 'till he's able to fire anyone who might think about slowing things down a bit for the good of the country.

Add this to the other union busting, iraqi torturing, environment polluting, regulation lossening executive action with no senate input and well....never mind....can you believe what a fucking slimeball Russ Feingold is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please post a link to the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Here you go
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 11:44 PM by Pirate Smile
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1189933

WP: Civil Service System on Way Out at DHS
White House Wants All Agencies to Have Option of Setting Own Personnel Policies

The Bush administration unveiled a new personnel system for the Department of Homeland Security yesterday that will dramatically change the way workers are paid, promoted, deployed and disciplined -- and soon the White House will ask Congress to grant all federal agencies similar authority to rewrite civil service rules governing their employees.

-snip-
"They are encouraging a management of coercion and intimidation," said John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees. He added: "This is not a modern system. This is a step backward."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Another facet of fascism: suppression of labor.
Labor unions are either destroyed or seriously diminished.

The neoCONimperialists fulfill every defining characteristic of fascism,...all 14 of them!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like I got out just in time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. So who's around to stop this dictatorship?
if not the Senate?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Uh......you?
The senate can't do anything about executive action, since they don't control the executive branch. You can, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. pithy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Let's all email Bush and tell him we're not going to vote for him
in 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. But , but, but, I don't have any energy to go after Bush, I have 32 Dem
Senators to take out first.

Don't you dare bring some perspective in here, I won't have it!

(LOL)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. The venting of frustration at our own has died down quite a bit
Today we spent a lot of time daydreaming about the '08 ticket. There seemed to be less mud-slinging than in previous discussions. Perhaps a good sign -- I'm hoping we can get on to more practical matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feelthebreeze Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. It don't mean a thing...
if it ain't got that string. Post a thread with this kind of info. Can't pass it on nor verify it otherwise.

The winds of change are starting to blow...can you feel the breeze?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. A good reason for SOLIDARITY!
BTW, the Administration has been usurping the power of Congress to write Legislation by creating the equivalent of New Legislation by Admnistrative Decree almost since day one. This has been a favorite ploy of all presidents who are at odds with Congress, however, since the same party runs the White House and Congress the only reason for doing it now is to let the GOP pussies in Congress avoid having to answer to the voters back home.

:mad: :nuke: :mad: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Absolutely right on the money n/t READ THE ABOVE POST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. the problem, friend, is that the Democrats are enabling BushCo . . .
at every turn . . . the Patriot Act, the tax cuts for the wealthy, the Iraq war authorization, the recent budget bill, the Rice nomination, etc. etc. etc . . . I'll stop attacking Democrats when they stop voting like Republicans and start standing up for what's right instead of what's expedient . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. Five more republican Senators in 2006 and
Bush has a dictatorship. (No Filibusters).

And he'll get them with electronic voting machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Exactly how..
.... would that differ from what we have now?

As long as 2/3 of the Senate is willing to rubber-stamp Bush**'s agenda, remind me again of the advantage of them being there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
15. Right wing LOVES left wing circular firing squads note DNC Chair race
The more those who are not allied with the administration fight among themselves the less time and energy they'll have to fight the administration.

In addition to liberals absolutely inscensed at politicians who voted for Condi, (I'll admit I'm one of them) the bigger Democratic infighting story has been conservative establishment elements in the party doing their damndest to stop Howard Dean from winning the DNC chair election.

I am truly hoping that we'll see a relatively united front against Gonzalez and the DNC chairmans race works out in such a way that the party becomes stronger. My hope for the former is pretty high. A vote against Torture Memo Boy is pretty safe--we may even see some moderate Republicans going along for the ride.

As for the DNC, if the Democratic establishment stops pressuring delegates to vote ABD this would be better for the party in the long run. If Dean wins, he may be terrific or he may be terrible. If he loses because of what's perceived of as interference by conservative Democrats who some perceive as regarding Dean as a worse threat as a worse threat to world order than Bush, Cheney, Rummy and Gonzalez all rolled in together, this will seriously damage Democrat's ability to rally together against this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC