Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How are you responding to this rightist meme?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:35 AM
Original message
How are you responding to this rightist meme?
I don't know if I can express this fully, but it is out there. They have deemed the election to be a resounding repudiation of all things liberal. They have declared our death. Blah, blah.

It is an interesting meme, if nothing else. I have responded by asking them what they think they're doing. Of course, we are still here. We haven't gone away. They can't simply kick us aside although that is clearly what they want to do. We will be there in 2006, and 2008 and we have the advantage of not really being responsible for what happens under their policies.

Of course this is nevertheless combined with their b.s. about how everything bad that is going on is our fault.

It is residual hubris, I know. It is something that will lead to their downfall as they overreach. Maybe we should let it die its own death?

Anyone else noticing this? Any thoughts on how to respond to it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let them misunderestimate us.
Then we'll kick them in the teeth.

They seem to forget that 1.5% ain't much of a swing in the grand scheme of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ultimately, yes
They think they're pouring salt in our wounds?

So you say lay low and let the hubris die under its own weight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. I tell them barely 51% is not overwhelming
Then I tell them to fuck off. The time for good manners is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. And you say
go nose to nose with them on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I say
Go nose to nose with them on EVERYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. A one percent "mandate". Yeah, liberalism is dead
*lol*


Morons. They have no idea how many of us there are.

------------------------------------------------------
Join the new Boston Tea Party!
http://timeforachange.bluelemur.com/index.htm#shopping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Well, bush has a boy-date
that's what I say, and it really pisses them off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. There are a few ways that I prefer.
1) I remind them that more people voted for John Kerry than for ANY other challenger to an incumbant President.
2) I point out that 51% is a narrow victory, not a mandate.
3) I explain that John Kerry, while certainly a Democrat, is not the embodiment of all things liberal. If anything, his defeat was a repudiation of all things moderate.
4) I spang them over the head with a shovel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I am particularly interested in your "shovel" method.
Do you prefer a cross-face motion, so as to hopefully extrude some teeth? Or do you prefer a more concussion-delivering downward, club-like blow to the top of the head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I find that the back of the head is the most satisfying.
Because everyone else can see the look on their face when it happens. You can even arange to have it video taped. Though barring that, across the side, directly to the temple will allow you to get at least a partial view of their face at the moment of impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes, please expound on the shovel technique!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. "The party of Jerry Fawell & David Duke always loses in the end..."
"...just look at civil rights & freedom from religion now-a-days as compared to 'the good old days.'"

That outta get their goat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Did they do this after Dukakis and Mondale too
If we didn't die after those campaigns, I doubt we'll just shrivel up after a 49-51 loss where they had to, if not fraud the vote, then suppress the living hell out of it.

Oh yeah, they should be so proud :eyes:

I think they're like a short guy wearing lifts. They know they're really short underneath, so they're overcompensating by trying to talk big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I would like to see some scholarly thought on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here's how I respond.
Right-wing extremists are domestic terrorists. Any group that will not tolerate the existence of another group and threatens its existence particularly with violence is a terrorist organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. take away the Texas gerrymandering, and they LOST GROUND IN THE HOUSE
Their blatant thievery in the Texas redistricting didn't even give them as many seats as they thought, as Chet Edwards can attest. Take away the seats gained in Texas from this illegal defiance of the Federal Courts and a lawful redistricting in '01, and they had a net loss in the House.

Yeah, they took red-state Senate seats, but even through their thievery in Florida and Ohio weren't able to get much more than 2 per cent of an edge in the popular vote. The winner-take-all mentality is disgusting, and fits perfectly with a conservative worldview: others simply shouldn't exist. Whether the field is split or not, the shrieks of the privileged ring loudest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It disgusts me too.
How do we counter it?

On the one hand I say fight like hell. On the other, I think their hubris and their over reaching will be their ultimate undoing.

They are, though, ultimately reactionary. They need to brush up against us to make their case. They will, predictably, find some way to blame their failure on us. We've seen this in so many flavors: 1) it's Clinton's fault; 2) dissenters are traitors, undermining their efforts; 3) Bush isn't really conservative; . . .

By fighting like hell, do we enable them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. I tell them it's not wise to misunderestimate an opponent n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Liberalism is dead.....Painting is dead
I can only relate this to the idea in the art world that painting is dead. That it has nothing new or interesting to offer. My students will often bring this idea up when they want to be contentious or to show that what they are learning is a waste of time.

Years past I would often use "Buffy" to give them an alternative understanding of what being "dead" actually means.

I would ask them who the most interesting characters on the show were: dead or living?

And which of the two had to work within the constraints of society? In other words, which ones had to follow all the rules: dead or living?

After a series of such questions they would finally begin to see that there was a freedom in being dead and ignored. You could play with the system, play with the ideas within the system and have a better time doing it.

I'm all for being dead. Viva la Mort!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. Everything bad going on is THEIR fault.....
They've got all 3 branches of government now. Have had for some time, in fact. 9/11, War in Iraq, struggling economy--all on their heads.

And 51% of the voters who bothered to turn out is not impressive. Especially when you figure in the electronic vote factor.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debs Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. I remind them
That before this presidential election we won the popular vote in THREE presidential elections in a row, then tell them when they win the popular vote in four elections in a row, we can talk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. 48% and the second most votes for a presidential candidate in history
are signs of life and strong disagreement with Bush...not our death. If we'd actually run a half decent campaign and your side weren't full of ignorant morons (1/2 of Bush's supporters don't know basic facts about his policies) we'd have won handily
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC