Each one of the four front runners is very electable.
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 03:59 PM by mvd
What matters most is that the nominee's strategic team is very good. I'm just tired of hearing that this candidate or that candidate isn't electable. Who is with me?
well, actually 50%, because no New England "liberal" can win. That's politics in 2004. All four are great guys, but being realistic is something Democrats need to be.... or else.
I think that this perception can be changed when policies come into view and if a candidate is perceived as strong on security. Again, we just need good advisors for our nominee. Dean is not really a liberal, and I don't think Kerry would be seen as weak on security.
My thinking is that if someone with as many deficiencies as Bush has can become President, even the most unelectable of our front runners can be elected if they effectively stay on message and pick a good team.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.