Two words for naive people who think that Deanies are weenies...

[Bush loves Jiang]

Bill Clinton

[Jack_Dawson]

1. I don't get it

But I did like Bill Clinton. 23 million new jobs? Not bad.

[Dookus]

2. Huh?

I'm not sure I get your point.

[Bush loves Jiang]

3. :)

Look at the 1992 Iowa Caucus results.

And for that matter, check out 1988.

[youngred]

11. ok, still whats your point

he was running out of nowhere-not the front runner
he was running against Harkin who IS Iowa democratic politics-even Harkin's backing couldn't help him

There is no comparison

[Melinda]

4. Clinton lost both Iowa and NH in 1992

He got 3% of Iowa in 1992.
I'm fairly certain that's the point.

[Sterling]

5. Some people

are ssssllloooowwwww.

[hellhathnofury]

7. I call them anti-Dean forces.

[bhunt70]

6. Momentum...

Dean doesn't have it

[Deja Q]

8. Comparing Dean to Clinton?

:cry:

[lurk_no_more]

12. Wow that is a stretch

no wonder it didn't register :thumbsdown:


And then there were none!
” JAFO”

[youngred]

9. huh?

he was at Kucinich levels in 92, and wasn't a fading front runner.

The only respect in which they are similar is that they are moderates whom most people consider to be liberals

[Joe the Revelator]

10. I know Bill Clinton, I'm Friends with Bill Clinton, Howard Dean is no...

Clinton Entered the race much later then Dean did. Didn't he not have the kind of organization that Dean had in Iowa? Comparing Dean and Clinton just doesn't work logically.