Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can Dean win? Is it still possible? give me hope please

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:12 PM
Original message
Can Dean win? Is it still possible? give me hope please
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dobak Donating Member (808 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
But this setback is going to make it a longshot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:14 PM
Original message
Iowa is not predictive of who gets the nomination
They'll work harder now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dobak Donating Member (808 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. yes, but the negative press is going to siphon a lot of support
It will take tons of work to get that support back.

It can be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course it's possible.
Take a deep breath. You've got tons of cash and your organization is still intact. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ACPS65 Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. It'll be an uphill battle.
18% among an anti-war crowd....not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. We'll see.
My guy did great, but I still wish we had what dr. Dean has, at this point. I'd trade in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sure! Dean still has a great advantage in $$ and endorsements
He leads in NH, he has a great chance at the nom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:19 PM
Original message
He also led in Iowa until recently.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackson Smith Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. It'll be tough. He's getting creamed. Under 20%
He's coming in 3rd in a state he was widely considered to do great in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am flipping out here man
I thought we were doing awesome. We have money, and people on the ground. We have the biggest union in Iowa. We have the endorsment of Harkin. WTF is going on? Eeeeek.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
39. Feel bad for ya guys... Must be a shocker.
If it's any consolation - a lot of us have been there (losing when you thought you were "absolutely" supposed to win). That makes it even tougher because it's a even bigger letdown. I know I've had my heart "ripped" out a few times myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishguy Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. None, it's hopeless
For a good without a job who did so much campaigning to have such a poor performance means Iowans saw something in him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Clinton was third or fourth in Iowa..
and he went on to win the White House. Always Believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Exactly, Iowa aint the boss of me.
Honestly I was surprised that a latte drinking liberal ever had a chance in that state.

Joe Six pack never disapoints to have a pavlovian response to RW propaganda. Too bad so many dems helped them out this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackson Smith Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Clinton didn't even run in Iowa
He spent little time and money there. Dean has been all over Iowa. He badly wanted to win there. Clinton was banking on the South (where Dean is very iffy).

This field has much more overall talent than the '92 field. Tsongas? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. yes, definitely possible
Your guy still leads NH and so many other primary states. He's gonna live to see another day and he'll be one of the finalists, quite possibly the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Probably not tonight
But this doesn't end it. Buck up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. absolutely
Clinton didn't do too hot in Iowa either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well...
I don't take either Iowa or NH as seriously as some here do, although Dean did pour a lot of money and time in those states.

He has to win NH, though, after this, imho.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. Not only does he have to win NH
He has to win it big and do everything he can to stop Kerry's impending momentum.

I do not see that as very likely.

If Dean doesn't win NH, he's done for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. Can you believe this? A week ago they were saying that Dean was a "shoo-in
Just goes to show you that the media don't know shit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indiana Democrat Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:16 PM
Original message
Clinton lost Iowa...
then was second in NH then won.

I am a Dean supporter and hope he can pull it out
in NH and place in SC if so he is still in.

Otherwise...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathleen04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's not over yet..
get ready for round 2, NH.

And, the night isn't over yet..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. Of course...
Plenty of people have lost Iowa and went on to the White House. Clinton and Reagan are two that come to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Of course we can still win
This is one state out of 50.
Tomorrow we'll dust outselves off and move on to winning New Hampshire.
Gephardt on the other hand looks like he's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestMomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. Remember, Carter's the only candidate to win Iowa and the WH
Iowa just shows us that anything can happen. Hang in there....

And if the future changes things around for your candidate, remember people's kind words tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. carter didn't win iowa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark4VotingRights Donating Member (795 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. yes: Honestly, anyone can still win. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. It's wide open
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HalfManHalfBiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. It is over for Dean
Killed in Iowa. And Kerry will easily win NH with his momentum. And Dean has no chance in SC.

0 for 3 will not bode well.

Dean is just wrapped too tight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CabalBuster Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
27. Money and organization are the key ...
I really believe Gephardt and Sharpton's attacks hurt Dean. But he's got the money and the supporters in the long haul, Iowa is overrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
28. As others have noted
other candidates have won the Primary without winning Iowa. I caught just the tail end of a segment on NPR (yes, I know, but best news I can get on the car radio) saying that Iowa was not a particularly good predictor of the nominee. It's a long road yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. Here's a list of winners and losers of previous Iowa caucuses
As you may note, the winner in 1988 was Dick Gephardt, followed by Paul Simon (politicians from neighboring states), with the ultimate nominee, Michael Dukakis, coming in a distant third. The winner in 1972 was Edmund Muskie, who ultimately lost out to George McGovern for the nomination.

Even more remarkable is that in 1992, Bill Clinton only garnered a paltry 2.8%-- and we all know the rest of THAT story.

http://desmoinesregister.com/extras/politics/caucus2004/pastresults.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
31. Clinton did not win Iowa's caucus....


Kerry did well tonight because the Gephardt people bailed on Gephardt and went for Kerry. That won't happen in primary states unless Gephardt drops out of the race.

And even if he does, there's Clark, who will be pulling support from the same demographic supporting Kerry.


Also this was a very very expensive win for Kerry. There's no way he can maintain this burn rate... that's going to be Dean's big advantage over Kerry as the race moves on to states with votes and no caucus.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. Nobody seriously ran in Iowa in 92
because Harken was a shoe in. New Hapshire was the big fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
32. Dean is badly hurt here.
Search my posts. I am not rubbing it in. This is very bad for Dean. It makes him look like a myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
33. It's OK... Now the press will start hammering Kerry and Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
34. Dean Can Win. He Has Money & Organization in all 50 States.
Don't get too discouraged.

Dean can go the distance while the rest must live off the land from Primary to Primary.

He has a very strong advantage and can run media blitz campaigns in the multi-state primaries where it is impossible for any candidate to be at the same time.

Howard Dean will arrive in Boston with at least 35% of the delegates even if he stumbles.

Take cheer in that.

I am a Dean supporter, but tonight I am giving a lot of credit to John Kerry and John Edwards and their supporters. They deserve it.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Of course he can still win
although I would still rather see Clark, Dean is still a very viable candidate and if anyone writes him off he is a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
36. I feel like crying. (Big Dean supporter). I thought he would at
least come in second. Oh well, ABB. I like Edwards over Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Don't Cry.
Dean has shown very well.

And will continue to do so.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
38. Geez, spook easily?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. Yeah, really
Winning Iowa actually seems to be a curse for Democrats, because since 1972 the winner has never gone on to win the White House*

*Jimmy Carter "lost" to "Uncommitted" in 1976.
Al Gore won Iowa in 2000, but he got screwed by the Fraudulent Five in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
42. Best news for Dean today- It sounds like Gep is dropping out.
Hopefully he'll push his resources over to Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC