Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is anyone suing to challenge tax status of the GOTV churches yet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:58 PM
Original message
Is anyone suing to challenge tax status of the GOTV churches yet?
From what I've been reading, it's apparent that many church parishes, Catholic and Evangelical, have been engaged in some pretty blatant candidate endorsements. That is sufficient grounds for them to pay taxes.

If these alleged followers of Christ like preemptive wars so very much, it's time for them to start picking up the tab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe they are exempt but shouldn't be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are exempt only if they follow the rules of tax-exempt organizations
Among those rules is candidate neutrality. Tax-exempt organizations cannot distribute voting guides that endorse candidates, let alone directly advocate on a candidate's behalf from the pulpit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. All churches should be taxed
Maybe give them breaks for education programs and programs for the needy, that sort of thing, but otherwise they should pay property taxes, just like the rest of us. Then they can talk politics all the want and it wouldn't be illegal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vetwife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Being turned in as well as other Tax exempt org who violated !
They are being turned in !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Excellent! Do you have any urls for news stories about this?
It's so farkin' illegal, what they've done...

If the republicans are going to attack the NAACP, then it's about time we hit back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Here is one of the most important websites
and organizations (IMO) on this issue:

Americans United for the Separation of Church and State:

http://www.au.org

I haven't kept up with them recently, but they ARE hot to trot on this issue. Barry Lynn, Exec Dir, is both an ordained Presbyterian minister and an attorney. They do great work and are definitely worthy of our support (membership used to be $25/year and their monthly newsletter alone was worth that price). They've often teamed up with ACLU and/or PFAW to bring lawsuits, and have indeed filed complaints with IRS against various churches, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Excellent! au.org confirms the CC voting guides are a direct violation
I've read multiple accounts of priests/reverends/ministers/whatever handing them out IN THE CHURCHES. Time to take them down a notch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftist. Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. !!! Thank you SO MUCH for posting this!
I've been trying to post all day asking this very question!!! (Is DU not allowing people with low post counts to start new threads???)

Anyway, keep this kicked!!! Thanks again!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
almostallhere Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. i think they recently increased the # required to start new threads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wols Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. If you guys think that this fundamentalist Christian administration
is going to let the IRS go after conservative Christian churches I have a bridge I'd like to sell you. Yes, they broke the law, just as many black churches have no doubt done. Yes, they should have their tax exempt status taken away. But there's no way it's gonna happen. This IRS has decided to go after the NAACP but not Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition. Is anyone surprised? I predict any lawsuits filed against these right wing churches will go nowhere. Hope I'm wrong. Separation of church and state would be a neat concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eriffle Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. it won't stick
they would have to have someone on tape saying vote for candidate X. from personal experience what they said was vote for the candidate that supports outlawing abortions, or saying a vote for a pro-choicer is a vote to go to hell. they can then explain the issues of the candidate, but as long as they don't say vote for bush they're inside the letter of the law. i work in the tax-prep industry (college job, studying to be an accountant) and these people are savvy. they know what to do, and not what to do. they may be able to nail some fire and brimstone preacher in podunk america, but any of the mega churches, or in my case the catholic diocese of west virginia, know how to get their message across and stay within the tax code.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Like you say, there is some subset of the ministry who have fucked up
They should be held duly responsible.

As for the rest, you're right, they know how to work the system. But I would still see grounds for a challenge insofar as "vote for the candidate that supports outlawing abortions" is about as candidate-neutral as saying "vote for the incumbent candidate from Texas whose name rhymes with tush."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. And it's time to make tithing a requirement of church membership
They want to quote Leviticus and all that garbage, those "convenient Christians," they can pay their damn dues to the Lord.

"Lip service evangelicals," just like their (mis)leader bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouLiedTheyDied Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Does anybody think a couple steps ahead?
Do you forget WE go into churches as well... let's not cut off our own noses to spite our faces! My lord, you realize that whenever you ask the government to investigate something you become part of the investigation as well? We ask them to look at Republican churches, how many African American churches are going to get harassed in the process. Neither side should be in churches looking for votes and we do it too! Let's get ready for the midterms and take the Senate back before all the courts get packed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Hey, if we're doing it, we should damn well stop
If the ministers in black churches are telling their parishoners to vote for a candidate instead of an issue, then they should be paying taxes too. Fuck it. Let's do this thing, and let the chips fall where they may.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. the problem is they will go after the minority churches
and they will leave the white ones, especially the white right wing churches alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Then we sue the enforcers for equal protection violations
Look, we have about 2 years before the next set of elections, and about 1 year before the judiciary is hopelessly stacked against us. Do you want to fix this problem or let it fuck us up in 2006, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Right on, on all counts
If we want Separation of Church and State, then we want it everywhere.

It just occurred to me: THIS is what Bush is aiming at (or one thing) with his "tax simplification" plan. Because, obviously, the separation of church and state where it comes to elections is implemented via our tax code. THey definitely want to do away with that. We CAN'T let them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
18. Great thread I was thinking of this yesterday
I said to my husband if the churches are registering voters and telling out right people who to vote for and sending their people flyers about it in the mail they should loose tax exempt status, that would hurt them.

They would have to check on it though to be fair to the ones who didn't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdx_prog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. Yes.....I posted something about this the other day
it is illegal for them to engage in political issues.....but as long as they don't mention candidates it is ok.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC