Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Something Al Sharpton needs to do.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:13 PM
Original message
Something Al Sharpton needs to do.
Until Sharpton owns up to being a part of this farce, he has little credibility.

In 1987, Sharpton helped fuel a sad and racially divisive hoax. For weeks, he grabbed headlines and the nightly news spotlight as the chief spokesman for Tawana Brawley, the black teenager from Wappingers Falls who claimed she was kidnapped by a gang of white men. She said that after the men raped her, they stuffed her in a plastic bag, smeared her with feces and wrote racial epithets on her skin. If that wasn't bizarre enough, Sharpton made the additional claim that one of the attackers was a Dutchess County prosecutor, Steven Pagones.

The story was painfully disturbing, and it was false. A state attorney general's investigation determined that Brawley had fabricated the story to avoid being punished by her parents for staying out late.

Pagones sued Sharpton for defamation and won a $65,000 judgment. With the financial help of Percy Sutton, the former Manhattan borough president, Sharpton eventually paid off his debt to Pagones. Nevertheless, by all accounts, Pagones' life had been ruined by the slander.

Sharpton has steadfastly refused to apologize for the Brawley case, even though over the years he has sought to reinvent himself as a statesman-like figure.

http://www.nynews.com/newsroom/011304/b01p13reisman.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Character Assassin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. He will never do this
and, accordingly and appropriately, will remain an eternal footnote in American politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. I believe his view is that he does not believe he should
apologize for having believed Brawley, and for acting in accordance with those beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sharpton says that he won't apologize because he believed her
He says that he should not be attacked for believing a young woman. Whether you agree or not, he has a great line about it, "I stood up for a 15-year-old girl I believed in. Where is the scandal? I guess if I fondled her, they'd make me governor of California."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think that it is believing Tawana that many whites find so

off-putting about Sharpton. His manner is neither humble nor meek, he does not adopt a deferential attitude toward white politicians, nor does he make any attempt to "act white."

This is much more disturbing to the white power elite than any one single incident.

As someone pointed out when this was discussed in a previous thread, it is inconceivable to some among the white power elite, and the general public as well, that anyone would deliberately eschew "acting white."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Agree
Edited on Sun Jan-18-04 07:46 PM by beaconess
That explains why when Dr. Dean challenges white people about race or accuses George W of using racially charged code words, he's hailed as a hero for engaging in a "dialogue."

When John Edwards calls Howard Dean's claim that he's the only white politician talking about race to white audiences untrue and divisive, he's applauded for setting the record straight.

When John Kerry gives a speech blasting Republicans for stacking the courts with judges who arenhostile to civil rights, he's praised for telling it like it is.

But when Al Sharpton points out that Howard Dean's rhetoric on race doesn't match his record, he's accused of racebaiting.

Apparently, white folks can talk about race all they want, but if a black man does it, he's playing the race card.

Racebaiter = modern day euphemism for "uppity negro."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. exactly nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. its perceived as whining
and trying to make white people feel guilty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Character Assassin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. How profoundly, comically wrong
His manner is neither humble nor meek, he does not adopt a deferential attitude toward white politicians, nor does he make any attempt to "act white."

Please, by all means, tell me, exactly, precisely and definitively, what it means to 'act white', and how that applies to Sharpton.

This is much more disturbing to the white power elite than any one single incident.


You are extraordinarily, almost indescribably wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. name one pro-black, non-apologetic black person
who is in favor with the media/ general public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Or, name one white politician who is called a race baiter or demagogue
for speaking up about race?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
30. Black folks are fine, as long as they play along
But the minute someones questions the status quo, they're relegated to demagogue status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I think you can answer that question yourself

List the African-Americans you would vote for for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Character Assassin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. For starters, Ken Chenault
But I don't foresee him running, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. LOL and I started to mention him in my previous reply to you but

refrained because I thought it would be rude and "inflammatory"

Thank you, Mr. President. This has truly been a very productive meeting. On behalf of all of us here I want to thank you for your outstanding leadership. The job of a leader is to define reality and give hope. And you are defining this new reality, and you're acting in a very positive way to bring us forward. And you are giving us a great deal of hope through your leadership.

Your team is moving very quickly and decisively on a range of actions to help stimulate the economy....We have some short-term challenges, we have a number of specific actions that you are putting in place that we have confidence will restore the economy, will restore the growth for our nation.
And Mr. President, your leadership has been outstanding on every level. You have the support of everyone in this room. You have the support of the American people. You have the support of our friends around the globe. We will not succumb to this evil. We believe in the American promise, and we will do everything to build on that promise.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/specials/attacked/transcripts/bushtext_100301.html



"I believe women should be admitted as members of the Augusta National Golf Club," Chenault said in a statement released by American Express, the newspaper reported. "I have made my views known within the club because I believe that is the most effective and appropriate way to bring about a change in membership policy."

http://www.ericmcerlain.com/offwingopinion/archives/000409.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. and he is totally independent of their influences
hell, look at how Bush has Powell shucking and jiving for him and has totally relegated him to total insignificance.

What is Powell's post again? With Baker, Rumsfeld, Condi, Bermer, Ashcroft and the rest I have totally forgotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush loves Jiang Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
33. "he does not adopt a deferential attitude toward white politicians"
Unless it's Al D'amato or George Pataki.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush loves Jiang Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
34. Coherence?
Edited on Mon Jan-19-04 11:07 AM by Bush loves Jiang
Posted in wrong thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. I did not agree with his stand in 1987....
....but do not believe it has any relevance at this time. The Rev. Sharpton is trying to expand the base of the democratic platform for the fall. Less than 35% of potential black voters took part in the 2000 election. He has the ability to inspire people - real people - who may have had some experiences 18 years ago that no longer define them today, to take a part in this process. I applaud him, and hope that you will consider that he has matured. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sharpton needs to quit the race and endorse Howard dean!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, if a girl told you she was raped, you'd call her a liar?
Just wondering. I think if someone told me they had been brutally raped, my first instinct would be to get justice, not to assume she is a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. nobody on this board has EVER answered this question
:argh:

Apparently, there is no need to answer this question, since I'm totally out of line. Because everyone knows that only black men rape white women, right? The opposite would never happen would it? So anyone who would have the audacity to believe that a black girl was gang raped by white men should be locked away for life!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Actually, I spent 20 years....
....where part of my job was accessing this type of thing. While your question has some merit, the truth is no, not every time a woman says she has been raped is it true. Next, your comment on race is out of place here. Third, even if it were open to question at first, this case became an obvious scam early on. Saying that, I still have come to respect Sharpton much more in the past six months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. The least believable aspect of Tawana's story was that she reported it

The mainstream may not feel comfortable with that reality, but in a case such as you describe the victim's claim would be examined with what it is probably most tactful to call "careful scrutiny."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sharpton is a charlatan. He gives a bad name to
Edited on Sun Jan-18-04 07:55 PM by RUexperienced
Democrats, New Yorkers, African Americans, Civil Rights workers, and Christians.

But don't ask me what I REALLY think of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SadEagle Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think it's his most serious issue.
I hardly think that someone who would endorse Al D'Amato has the credentials to represent the Democratic party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's not his "past" that disturbs me, it's his "present" that does
I'm wondering why he is attacking the only current non-DLCer(Dean) that's registering any sort of numbers in the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Here we go again
Edited on Sun Jan-18-04 09:29 PM by beaconess
Dean can go after the other candidates, claiming they're not doing enough about race. The other candidates can criticize Dean for falsely posturing as the only candidate talking about race to white audiences.

But when Al Sharpton does it, he's out of line?

Here's a hint. Sharpton is criticizing Dean, not because he's the only non-DLCer who's making a showing in the polls (pretty tortured qualifiers, eh?) but because Dean's the only candidate in the race who has been lecturing everyone else about how the race issue needs to be resolved and boasting that he is the candidate who is best able to address the problem but has never done a damned thing in his entire life to advance the cause of civil rights for minorities, except talk about it and who, when he had the chance to actually do something meaningful, he didn't lift finger because, at least according to some of his defenders, it would have been too hard.

That's why Sharpton challenged Dean and thank God he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'm no fan of Dean because of his stance on re-evaluating
civil liberties.
What disturbs me is that the slaps aren't evenly distributed in between candidates since minorities are only receiving lip service and nothing more by all of the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. What "slaps" about race should he make at the other candidates?
Edited on Sun Jan-18-04 10:36 PM by beaconess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. how about the lack of support in order to contest the
presidential election in 2000?

How about unemployment and blacks?

How about subpar education and blacks?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Response
Edited on Mon Jan-19-04 12:04 AM by beaconess
1. Sharpton has criticized the other candidates for this. He probably hasn't brought it up recently since none of the candidates are strutting around claiming to be the only one interested in electoral reform. I'm sure if any of them try to go there, Sharpton will slap them down but quick.

2. Sharpton has been talking constantly about education and unemployment. What specifically is Sharpton supposed to say in criticism of any of the individual candidates with regard to unemployment and education deficiencies. Have any of them individually done something to exacerbate the problem or are any of them refusing to do anything about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. my response
Have any of them individually done something to exacerbate the problem or are any of them refusing to do anything about it?

The perception is that they have done nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Well, the perception is wrong
And even Sharpton knows it - that's probably why he hasn't been going after them and, at least where Edwards has concerned, has given them credit for standing up and fighting for what's right.

Case in point:

Edwards has been actively fighting to keep Janice Rogers Brown, an unqualified right wing idealogue, off of the federal bench. A couple of months ago, a conservative talk show host blindsided Al Sharpton and asked whether he thought this nominee, an African American woman, should be given an up or down vote on the Senate floor. Apparently unaware of that Senator Edwards and others were filibustering her nomination, Sharpton said she should at least be given a vote and criticized Edwards for blocking her, even though he, too, opposed her nomination. But, to his credit, as soon as Sharpton learned all the facts, he retracted his comments and praised Edwards for doing the right thing.

Shortly thereafter, a Republican group launched an attack ad against Edwards in South Carolina, accusing him of mistreating this poor African American woman and preventing her from going on the bench. The ad was obviously aimed at African American voters with the intention of convincing them that John Edwards was bad on civil rights (so much for the argument that the Republicans don't fear Edwards).

The ad included Sharpton's original quote calling for her nomination to go to a vote and ended with, "The daughter of a share-cropper who worked her way through law school as a widowed mother has been nominated to the second highest court in the land. But she's being blocked by Sen. John Edwards . . . Al Sharpton gets it; Senator Edwards doesn't. Shame on you Senator Edwards."

Sharpton immediately blasted the Republican front group and demanded that they pull the ad.

"I am outraged and disgusted to see . . . a White House front group use my name, my face and my statements in a misleading manner to smear Sen. John Edwards. I am strongly opposed to the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown. Senator Edwards properly voted against Janice Rogers Brown after a careful and deliberative review of her right wing judicial findings - not her politics - and at the urging of myself and other civil rights leaders."

Clearly, any perception that John Edwards is not fighting and fighting hard for civil rights - and being attacked for it like no other candidate - is just not based on reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Thanks for this info. That is admirable of Sharpton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phirili Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. Kinda messed Dean up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
23. wouldn't this have about as much effect as Pete Rose's mia culpa ?
that is to say, too little too late ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
31. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC