Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

breaking news: N.C. machines all had faulty hard drives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 06:40 PM
Original message
breaking news: N.C. machines all had faulty hard drives

N.C. Computer Loses More Than 4,500 Votes

21 minutes ago
Yahoo News

JACKSONVILLE, N.C. - More than 4,500 votes have been lost in one North Carolina county because officials believed a computer that stored ballots electronically could hold more data than it did. Scattered other problems may change results in races around the state.


Local officials said UniLect Corp., the maker of the county's electronic voting system, told them that each storage unit could handle 10,500 votes, but the limit was actually 3,005 votes.


Expecting the greater capacity, the county used only one unit during the early voting period. "If we had known, we would have had the units to handle the votes," said Sue Verdon, secretary of the county election board.


Officials said 3,005 early votes were stored, but 4,530 were lost.


Jack Gerbel, president and owner of Dublin, Calif.-based UniLect, said Thursday that the county's elections board was given incorrect information. There is no way to retrieve the missing data, he said.


"That is the situation and it's definitely terrible," he said.


In a letter to county officials, he blamed the mistake on confusion over which model of the voting machines was in use in Carteret County. But he also noted that the machines flash a warning message when there is no more room for storing ballots.


"Evidently, this message was either ignored or overlooked," he wrote.


County election officials were meeting with State Board of Elections Executive Director Gary Bartlett on Thursday and did not immediately return a telephone call seeking comment.


The loss of the votes didn't appear to change the outcome of county races, and President Bush (news - web sites) won the state by about 430,000 votes in unofficial returns. But that wasn't the issue for Alecia Williams, who voted on one of the final days of the early voting period.


"The point is not whether the votes would have changed things, it's that they didn't get counted at all," Williams said.


Two statewide races remained undecided Thursday, for superintendent of public instruction, where the two candidates are about 6,700 votes apart, and agriculture commissioner, where they are only hundreds of votes apart.


How those two races might be affected by problems in individual counties was uncertain. The state still must tally more than 73,000 provisional ballots, plus those from four counties that have not yet submitted their provisionals, said Johnnie McLean, deputy director of the state elections board.


Nationwide, only scattered problems were reported in electronic voting, though roughly 40 million people cast digital ballots, voting equipment company executives had said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ahhhh, those poor poor people.....
Guess they will have to have another election to decide the "undecided" races. Guess it will cost them a lot of money they had not planned on spending. Guess some state program will have to make up the difference.

Maybe they should call the white house and see about getting a loan to help them offset their cost. Maybe they should file suit against the company that "failed" to give them the important technical details....

Sorry, for the sarcasm, but frankly I have no sympathy for them....

As has been said many times here lately...

Fuck 'Em

MZr7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaReservaPr Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC