Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, we're supposed to believe that Bush got more votes in several FLA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 11:08 AM
Original message
So, we're supposed to believe that Bush got more votes in several FLA
counties than there are registered Republicans? Right, I buy that. I wonder what other states this occured in?

Nassau County Bush 23,726 - Reg Rep 20,304
Hillsborough Bush 241,630 - Reg Rep 218,041

http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OilemFirchen Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Odd...
Random example:

Liberty County: Registered Reps: 322, Actual Results: 1,927.

How do they know the number of R vs. D in the actual voting? Do you have to declare a party when you vote in Florida?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't know about Florida but in my state they do know how you are
registered when you sign in to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. IN OH, when you go vote, you sign in the book.
Your registration is on your voting card, you declare your party when you register to vote. So, presumably, they would know how many registered republicans showed up to vote because they know exactly who showed up. So how the hell can there be more registered republicans to vote than there are actual registered republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Don't forget that Kerry won the majority of independents.
I don't know how the indy vote went in FL, but if FL shows indys went for Kerry it adds even more suspicion to these numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OilemFirchen Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. No one else finds this unusual?
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No, I find this more than just a little unusual.
But, Kerry conceded. Now what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YNGW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Not enough info
No accounting for independents. No accounting for Dems who crossed over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. They stole 2000 badly, but won in the end. This time they were better
at stealing it because of lessons learned in 2000. Computers in Ohio and Florida were probably super-easy to rig without ever laying a hand on them. Just hack in and set 'em to tally the votes whatever way you think will clinch it for your candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, other people voted for George too, thats why we lost by 3 MILLION
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. The stench is getting worse...
Surely somebody with some pull is looking into these, er, irregularities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC