Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm glad Daschle lost...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
March of Time Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:52 AM
Original message
I'm glad Daschle lost...
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 09:56 AM by March of Time
Better the GOP control the Senate by one more seat than the Democrats having shit leadership.

As long as the Dems have enough to filibuster, the magnitude of the GOP majority is of far less importance than the quality of the Democratic leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. actually I would have to agree with you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sad, but true.
I think he would still be in power today if he wasn't minority leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:53 AM
Original message
fuck that
with all the gay hating crap, daschle coming from a right wing state stood up against that shitty constitutional amendment crap. he was good on judges also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. there's logic for ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Maybe you can explain the following logic for us all.
IF the Senate is the only way the Dems could even hope to thwart the GOP agenda during the most closely divided, knife fighting, partisan period since the civil war.

THEN it is an excellent idea to have the senate dems led by a mild mannered guy who has to get elected in a rethug state during the most important presidential election year in history.

Am I glad Daschle lost his seat? Of course not. Do I think that his defeat may simplify process of choosing a leader who is both a)inclined to fight rather than deal and b)not tempted to hold his party's agenda hostage to his own electoral situation? Sure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. I not glad Daschle lost. I not glad people not use good
English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, that's brilliant.
Let's give up a couple of decades of tenure - great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. It depends on who the new minority leader will be!
I agree, Daschel was too meek and mild. But one of the jobs of a minority leader is supposed to be their ability to gain consensus. If all you wanted was strong, Ted Kennedy would have been leader a long time ago!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is not a time to be happy about anything political with the big
cheese still eluding us. I am damn too angry about everything concerning this election. I ahve never been one for looking towards the independents for salvation if we are not using our base as a means of caliberating our messages. We need to be more forceful about what we stand for!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sure, and where are we going to make up for these lost seats?
This is not over yet. There are still a lot of deeply red states that still send Dem senators to DC for whatever reason. And we are running out of places to make them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. Go back to the Freeper Board!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. You're an idiot. Guess why Daschle's the way he is? Because people like
Republicans in South Dakota.

You'd rather Daschle were more like Al Shaprton or Peter Camejo so that he could loose 90:10?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. The only thing sadder than someone being glad Daschle lost is the
loss itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Oh, that's well put.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. Fine words from a Canadian who joined 2 days ago!
Daschle was not my favorite for minority leader, but we lost a Democratic senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. Not me. I am never happy when a dem loses. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. Daschle Came From A Crimson Red State...
He was as progressive as a politician could be in that state and get elected.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. I'm not. I just wish he wasn't our leader in the Senate. The geography
tied his hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
16. So am I, actually
He was symbolic of everything wrong with the Democratic Party- Good riddance. Maybe now, we can fight back- for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cjbuchanan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. I am no big Daschle fan, but come on
He was still a democrat. We cannot start eating our own. He might not be as far to the left as you, but he still was better then the new senator from SD. I would prefer to have someone in the Senate that is open to my ideas, even if he ends up not going with them, then someone that I know I will have no influence on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. I regret losing his seat to a Repub, not losing him
I would have preferred he won, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
19. Democrats just couldn't understand that compromise was death
Instead of forgetting about what he thought were the heartland values of folks back home, about pork-barrel farm subsidies and playing nice with the lying sacks of crap in the WH, Daschle should have just stood up for what he believed. If someone's sure of purpose, others will follow. But he decided to cave and compromise and give in. And what did he get for his willingness to work together. The axe. I hope his tragic downfall serves as a lesson to other Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I'll believe you
as soon as you show me all the other politicians who succeed by "standing up for what they believe in," despite the fact that that runs counter to what their constituents believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. That's the point. Why on earth have the fight against the GOP
run by a guy who faces the daily temptations of having to get himself elected in a rethug state?

Anyone who says that Daschle did not, in multiple instances, hold the party's best interests hostage to his own electoral interests is as dumb as a dumbass can be.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. That's between Daschle and the Dem senators
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 11:04 AM by BillyBunter
who made him leader.

What I'm interested in is the implication that politicians can win by adopting positions that aren't shared by their constituents. People here have been saying this can be done for years now, but I'm not aware of a single politician, from either party, who has done this. Yet people continue to repeat it and repeat it, as though it is a simple fact, one that the politicians themselves are too vacuous to comprehend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. That's Why Chuck Schumer Represents New York
and Trent Lott represents Mississippi and not the other way around...

Some well intentioned folks are so lost when it comes to practical politics..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. You're taking too passive a view
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 11:19 AM by Snellius
Of course, Tom DeLay will not be elected to Charlie Rangel's seat, but the idea that citizens have all made up their minds and choose only those in their own likeness shirks the active role that leaders must play in setting an example, motivating change, and persuading voters that theirs is the right course. If a leader is not sure of his direction, no one will follow. Clinton knew this and so did Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Clinton Subdued His Liberalism To Govern
That's what triangulation was all about...


If you have a lot of political capital you can afford to take votes unpoular with your constituents...


However, the larger point is that the dustbin of political history is full of losing politicains who got too far ahead of their constituents...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
24. I'm not, even though I thought Daschle was a weak leader...
Tom Daschle in that seat rather than John Thune is definitely to our advantage.

Now, Daschle as Minority Leader, that's another subject entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
26. I'm NOT glad that the Repukes used filthy tactics to take down..
.. yet ANOTHER democrat. Shame on you for saying that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
27. Wonderful. We are slapped in the face. We lose our leader and a Senate
seat and you find something to crow about. I suppose Thune will vote better? Quality won't mean anything without votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
29. So you'd rather have Thune than Daschle, eh?
I have news for you. The Dems don't have enough votes to filibuster. Thanks to the Daschle loss you celebrate so heartily, the Republicans had a net gain of four seats in the Senate. That gives them 55 seats. But that's not the full story. At least five of the Democratic senators come from states that Bush carried by huge margins (Kent Conrad, Byron Dorgan, Tim Johnson, Max Baucus and Mary Landreau). If they consistently filibuster, they'll lose their seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Regardless....Daschle was an ineffective leader.
Pure and simple. The fact that he was one more vote is fine and dandy, but as a minority leader he sucked ass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ducks In A Row Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
33. That asshole is the reason the Dems didn;t have the guts to fight
diebold voting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. when DIck asked him to back off of the 9/11 inquiry,
he should've told checney, "go fuck yourself". it would have set a much better tone for the past three years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
35. I agree
I was happy when I heard he lost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC