|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
AnIndependentTexan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:32 PM Original message |
Ohio Supreme Court rules its okay to have poll challengers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrustingDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. has this ever happened before?.... my guess: not likely. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christiandem (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. has to be different issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troublemaker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. Can't be right - OH Supremes have no power over Federal decisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sara Beverley (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. The fact that people want to depress the vote ought to motivate others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. are you sure?? who reported it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
6. Did they take it to the Supreme Court? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lizzielou742 (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
7. I don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christiandem (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. Is this really a relevant issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christiandem (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
9. Plus, I haven't even heard of any state court cases yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattP (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. Supreme court ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bleacher Creature (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
12. I've been watching CNN...didn't hear this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattP (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-01-04 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. Supreme Court ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC