Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The missing explosives: they're muddying the waters, but this is simple

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EarlG ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:14 PM
Original message
The missing explosives: they're muddying the waters, but this is simple
Okay, with all this talk of Russian special ops and explosives that can be used to detonate nuclear weapons, the right-wing spin machine is doing a pretty good job of muddying this story. This is their favorite thing to do - if they can't spin a story to their favor, confuse the issue enough so the media gives up on it.

THIS IS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW.

1. The Bush administration didn't have enough troops, or didn't order the troops they did have, to guard the Al Qa Qaa weapons compound.

2. High explosives, still sealed with IAEA seals on at least April 18, 2003, were not guarded, and subsequently looted. This is the fault of the Bush administration.

THAT'S IT.

For extra credit:

3. We should be thanking our lucky stars that there WERE no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, because if there were, they would have been left in the same unguarded state as the high explosives. And thanks to the Bush administration's incompetence, they would have been looted too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's not us that need to hear this
It's the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EarlG ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yeah, I know
I guess the fact that CNN is still running with the bogus "Russian special ops" story is pissing me the hell off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. When will they pick up the SEAL photos from KSTP TV -we had sealed bunkers




Seals used by the IAEA (top). A seal on an Iraqi bunker door videotaped by a 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS crew on April 18, 2003 (bottom).

OK but which they had said more about this "seal" image that they posted to their web site.



BREAKING from KSTP (photos of IAEA seals)

http://kstp.com/article/stories/S3741.html?cat=1

A 5 Eyewitness News crew in Iraq may have been just a door away from materials that could be used to detonate nuclear weapons. The evidence is in videotape shot by Reporter Dean Staley and Photographer Joe Caffrey at or near the Al Qaqaa munitions facility.

The video shows a cable locking a door shut. That cable is connected by a copper colored seal.

A spokesperson for the International Atomic Energy Agency told 5 Eyewitness News that seal appears to be one used by their inspectors. "In Iraq they were used when there was a concern that this could have a, what we call, dual use purpose, that there could be a nuclear weapons application."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's all the IAEA's fault...
If they had told the Bushies that Oil-For-Food records were stored there, BushCo would have made guarding the site a high priority.

Piss poor planning on the IAEA's part, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. And these were "dual use" explosives materials.
Weren't "we" worried about nukes?????????????

Guess not.

How humiliating to let the Russians and the French get away with stealing these WMDs under our very noses!

</sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
specter Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. And just why
Edited on Thu Oct-28-04 05:21 PM by specter
would Russia need their high explosives???? ohh maybe they ran out of their own hmmmmm... thats it. Of course the fact that they have just about as many nukes as us isnt really a factor in them needing these high explosives. Or maybe they are selling these high explosives to syria instead of selling them some of their own nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. If their lie that the materials weren't there before they got there
were true, then they'd roll out the satellite images to back it up.
No photos? No proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Perhaps there were WMD's, and they too were looted....that's really
is a scary thought....one my son brought up prior to the war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. #3, no shit
Hopefully we'll get that Minneapolis clip on the teevee so people will have to believe it. That would have Bush up to his chin in pretzels. What would have happened if there were WMD... *gag cough choke* The entire Administration is drummed out of office, never to be seen again.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Explosives had no political value at the time
However, they do now.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Excellent observation
Evidence points to motive, your honor.

The prosecution is never required to establish motive, but when they manage do so successfully...:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well there is more to know
There is a report that there are over ten thousand similar sites in Iraq and I want to know if they are also unsecured and emptied out as well. We know one thing for certain. all of these sites were secure before the invasion and now they aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC