Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Norman Lear said this on CNN this morning.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
slater71 Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 03:37 PM
Original message
Norman Lear said this on CNN this morning.
Some reporter-ette asked him about the election and if he thought there would be any surprises. He said that he thought the young vote is really under estimated this year. He continued to say that he has never in all his years seen the collage people so energized as this year and that they could be the tipping point. He said they are not polled as most of them have cell phones so they do not show up in the polling. He could be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tomfodw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are being too greatly discounted
I read an analysis this morning that pointed out that Gallup is predicting only 14% of the electorate will be young, whereas it has not been less than 17% the past two elections. They're doing the same thing with African-American and Latin-American voters - predicting their turnout will be less than it has been in recent years. Not sure what their justification is. Maybe they want to discourage certain populations from voting.

I'm not saying this will lead to an election result greatly different from the polls. One can hope, but hope is not a plan. Our best strategy is still to try and spur a record turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Caller ID
may do more to skew polling than cell phones, although I have no data to support it. But just as an observation I would say caller ID is very prevalent and many people who have it simply don't answer unrecognized numbers or names. If you assume, again no data just an assumption, that younger people are more likely to embrace new technology, Caller ID would also skew polling older.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's exactly right!
The college students may very well be the tipping point. A HUGE tipping point. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC