Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suskind: Bush hints at "quid pro quo" with "someone" on the USSC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 01:57 PM
Original message
Suskind: Bush hints at "quid pro quo" with "someone" on the USSC
Froma salon.com interview with Eric Boehlert.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/20/ron_suskind/print.html

What did you suspect would be the reaction to the Times article, and did the whole Social Security privatization flap surprise you?

I wasn't expecting that. I was expecting Bush's quote -- "I'm going to be real positive while I keep on John Kerry's throat" -- to create a lot of heat and light. I was surprised the privatization quote got so much play. I think it was largely because Kerry focused on it.

Did that then force the Bush campaign to deny the quote and call it fabricated and "Kitty Kelley journalism"?

Of course. At this point, with two weeks to go until the election, it is regrettable but expected that either side, frankly, will do just about anything. It's regrettable that both sides have jumped onto the little rowboat of that one word <privatize>]. But the fact is, that's what Bush said.

As well, the president said, "I'm going to have an opportunity to name somebody to the Supreme Court right after my swearing in." That certainly suggests to me a quid pro quo, that there's been at least a passing of communication, if you will, between someone on the Supreme Court and the White House that immediately after the president's swearing in he'll have his first of what he considers, as he said at the luncheon, the first of four spots that he's expected to <be able to name> in his second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wouldn't you love to see Bush get asked point blank
Edited on Wed Oct-20-04 02:13 PM by BurtWorm
Have you or your administration been talking to members of the Supreme Court about their plans after the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Just another way the SCLM fails America (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rehnquist or O'Connor, I would suspect.
If Bush gets in, I hope that it's not Stevens. If Kerry gets in, Stevens might retire at some point during Kerry's term, but I doubt if Rehnquist or O'Connor would resign in that case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's definitely one of those two.
I'm surprised O'Connor didn't split while the going was good, considering how hot she was to get out before the last election was decided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. If This Is Attempted, Sir
Demopcrats in the Senate will have to keep the thing tied up with procedural matters and filibuster. There can be no quarter in this matter....

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It should be illegal, shouldn't you think so, your Honor?
I should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC