Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's up with CMB?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jjmalonejr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:20 AM
Original message
What's up with CMB?
Does she seem a little wacky lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Duder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Seems to be one of the more
intelligent candidates to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark4VotingRights Donating Member (795 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
47. Definitely one of the most intelligent candidates.
She's damn impressive.
It'd be a shame to waste her mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. no. Why do you think so? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathleen04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. In the past 2 debates..
she's had moments where she responds to about 3 people at once in a really rushed manner..and then they have to pause and let everyone respond.

I think her attack at Edwards tonight seemed largly unwarranted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red_Storm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Her attack on Edwards about voting along with Bush..........

backfired big time......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
65. How so?
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. shes' looking 4 a JOB
with Dean if he is elected. Which her in the debates, everytime he gets an endorsement she always mention that she had spoken with the endorsee. She defends him during the debates, all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Makes sense to me.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Because she's always been wacky....
People just tolerate her in general. They just accept her as a fringe candidate. In reality, she's more to the right than Lieberman, but, IMO, she gets a pass on a lot of her views because she's a woman and she's black. She's bucking the racial/sex status quo, so people are more apt to give her (wrongly) some slack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathleen04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:24 AM
Original message
How is she..
more to the right than Joe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. how is she to Lieberman's right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. She has a lot of "centrist" views on Heathcare, the War, Int'l Relations
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 12:43 AM by sleipnir
which you won't find on her website. I'd post links, but damn it, I've got a busy day tomorrow and I can't spend all night posting CMB links about her honest positions.

In short, she favors keeping troops in Iraq for an indefinate period (she claims to have fought against the War, but she offered no statements before the War)

Her experience as a Ambassador was odd and dangerous to say the least, she got drummed out of her seat in the House, and just look at her voting record while she sat in Congress. Her actions are louder than her words or the few "liberal" talking points she posts on her site.

I'd still vote for her over Lieberman, but that would be a tough vote for me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathleen04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. I haven't..
spent too much time learning about her policy positions aside from the debates, but I thought she was for single payer universal healthcare? I don't see how that would be a "centrist" position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
37. Sleipnir, it would be best to get your facts straight before making claims
that are inaccurate about CMB.

I have met CMB and have followed her campaign from the beginning. She is a wonderful, compassionate, fair and extremely saavy woman, and what you mentioned about the Iraq war is totally inaccurate.

She did not support the war and I heard her say it myself at a fundraiser.

Her opinion is that we should repair and take responsibility for what has ocurred over there, by not just leaving a tragic mess, but re-righting our wrongs by helping to TRULY re-build Iraq, and not just going in and building a capitalistic extravaganza and destroying a culture.

I would imagine she has looked at the situation very thoroughly and I feel confident in her knowledge and experience over mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Interesting perception
I have never read her to be to the right of Sen. Lieberman. And if she were - how is that fringe - seems that would suggest centrist with lots of current company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. "Wacky" is beyond the pale. More BS attacks from white people
CMB achieved more in American politics with less than anyone on that stage.

The attacks on CMB for "personal credit card transactions ? It was for a total of $311.28., and all the people were proven to have put out WAY more out of their own pockets for the campaign.

The "misdeeds" regarding her mother's property timber sales? Edna Moseley's kids were paying out their own pocket to get their mom better health care at the nursing home. Edna Moseley recieved some money, and tried to pay her kids back for some of the money they had spent on her health care. Edna Moseley and her children thought health care costs were reimbusable. They were right, but only some of the expenses were allowed and some were disallowed. Illinois Public Aid was paid for what was not reimbusable when the request was made.

The income tax charges? The IRS did a 5 year investigation including full audits for 3 years of basically every financila transaction CMB made in those three years.

Why?

There is a letter from the lead IRS agent William E Doukas describing the reasons for his incredibly intense investigation. Apparently, Doukas decided that the amount of $roughly 32,000 dollars in cash donantions was way too low for a US Senate campaign of an African-American. He felt "cash would be the most prevalent method for donation to the Senator's campaign fund." In other words, the implications is made that African-Americans don't know how to write checks.

Is it reasonable to conclude racial bias was involved in the investigation of Braun?

Look at this quote from a Lead IRS agant Doukas memo

"Attorney _______ also spoke of a D of J memo which stated that a higher threashold for wrong doing should be applied to minority office holders. (If this is indeed the case, and such a position is in writing, Then it's time for us to turn in our badges. After all, if "they" are "smart 'nough" to get elected, "they" are "smart 'nough" to go to jail)"

CMB was an excellent public servant that was hunted down and ruined by the neo-cons. Rush Limbaugh played the theme music from The Jefferson's every time he mentioned her name. It was organized by racists element in our society, and you dragged that right-wing smear campaign onto this board, sliepnir.

Have you no shame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. You prove my point to a T
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 12:51 AM by sleipnir
It's what I'm talking about. Question a black woman running for President and you get labeled a racist or a sexist.

Her past is shady, regardless of how you may view the evidence or outcome. If you're going to play the game of politics, you have to follow the rules and not deviate. She made some bad choices with money, finances, etc and the Radical Right pounced on her. True, many of the claims were ludicrous, but she still misappropriated money and that also bothers me. We don't hear about the Clark, Dean, or Lieberman's mishandling of donations because they know better than to screw around with political dynamite.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. I was right... another white bitching about CBM
All the evidence is on the CMB website. You don't care about evidence. Rush accused CMB of something, therefore it must be true, right

What I see is a caucasian that thinks it reasonable to have a far higher standard for African-American candidates to accomplish anything. You don't think it's reasonable to question the 1 MIL+ Wesley Clark recieved in speakers fee. You do think it's reasonable to question $311.28 of crdit card transactions.

It's clear there is bias in that behavior of yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. I'm not even going to answer your post.
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 01:10 AM by sleipnir
Other than, shame on you for assuming I'm white.

Mouse7, I usually agree with you, but this is assine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Because you CAN'T explain it
Yon know I'm right.

You know you yelled about CMB's $311.28 while giving a pass on Clark's 1 MIL+.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. I never said that...
Now you're putting words in my mouth. Good job, you win!

You may not believe it, but I do have problems, serious problems with Clark's speaking engagments.

But, Clark wasn't an elected offical at the time so there is a difference, but it seems you don't care.

The, "$311.28" excuse reminds me of the guy who said, "But officer, I was ONLY going 10 miles over the speed limit." It doesn't matter how much or how fast, you still violated the law, end of story.

I do hold our elected officals to a higher standard because I (and I think, and hope!, you do too, Mouse7) believe if I have trusted someone with my vote, then they should be honest, forthcoming and not try to lie to me. Which is why I'd be pissed as hell if any of the pro-IWR were my rep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. It's like being 0.0024475 mph over speed limit with a wife in labor
All the individuals involved had receipts for personal out of pocket campaign expenditures. There was determined to be no wrongdoing.

The figure is what percentage $311.28 is of the $7 million in CMB's campaign budget compared to the 55 mph speed limit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #45
59. So it's ok to misappropriate $300???
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 02:12 AM by sleipnir
In that light, it's ok for Bush to say that he killed 10,000 Iraqi's, but there's 10 million living there, so what the dif???

Seriously, that arugement is nothing less than perfuctory and meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. That's pretty desperate.... and it wasn't misappropriated
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 02:17 AM by mouse7
The $300 was all accounted for as I said before. The people involve all had stacks of recispts for campaign expensses they had paind out of pocket. It was a total of $311.28 that was UNDER QUESTIOJN. All the questions were answered when the receipts were shown.

Damn... to make an argument that desperate, and still have it disproven must suck, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. Nope, not really, but it's kinda sick that we're fighting over this...
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 02:28 AM by sleipnir
I'm calling a truce and if you'll accept, perhaps we can move on. It's obvious that neither one of us is going to find an amicable answer on the issue, so why bother? I don't want to engage in a seemingly endless debate over CMB's money issues when we should be arguing over more stringent ideals, like the recent O'Neill comments, or *'s absurd policy on immigrants. So, perhaps we can fight against the *'s and others??? We obviously have differing views on CMB and nothing is going to change that.


N.B (Mouse7, I do enjoy your posts, but please don't assume people are white, they may not be, and it could offend them if you post accusations like that...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. Actually, I think of her more as an opportunist.
But that's just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. Oh...good... lord.... CMB may be the best qualified candidate in field!
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 01:41 AM by mouse7
Let's make this clear. CMB was an award winning prosecuting attorney in Chicago. CMB was an award winning state legislator in Illinois. She served in the US Senate. She served as an ambassador.

CMB is far more national political experience than Wesley Clark, Howard Dean, John Edwards, and Al Sharpton. CMB has more varied eperience that Kerry, Gephardt, Lieberman, Kucinich (none of which has hands experience as diplomats).

CMB is, in reality, has the best resume on that stage to serve as President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. She was a damn good prosecutor.
A damn awful politician.

And this is coming from someone who worked on her first campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #33
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #26
44. her past is not shady
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhunt70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think she is losing steam.
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 12:24 AM by bhunt70
Perhaps the polling and fundraising is getting to her. She still smiles all the time and is a pretty good speaker but I think she is falling apart at the seams (or very close to it).

Lots of respect for her, Admittedly I never kept up with her before but the last three or four months have been good getting to know what she is all about.

edit-typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. You have to have steam before you can loose it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh my God, listen to yourselves!
How quick some people on here are to attack the integrity of ANYONE who has anything nice to say about Dean or anyone who defends him! Carol Mosley Braun has had very little to say negative about anyone in this race, and she has been a ray of sunshine in the storm of this primary season. Shame on people for dissing her for speaking her mind. I'm disgusted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. i didn't diss her
I just said the sister is looking 4 a job. More power to her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I don't think that's it
She's genuinely liked Dean all along...even when he was a long shot. If you go back and look at photos from early in the campaign there are some photos of them interacting that makes it clear that they genuinely like each other. And Dean will offer her a great job and would without her defending him. They sat together at the 40 year anniversary of the March on Washinton, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. I am not surprised
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. LMAO!
Angee you a mess.

And yes, I agree. Girlfriend is trying to get a job and she knows at this point the route back into politics is through a plum appointment. Voters in IL will never reelect her, rightly or wrongly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Especially the AA community
you can say all you want about Sharpton, but come election he is the one the nominee would want on their side to get the base out. CMB, doesn't have much of an impact nationally on the AA community.

But I respect her accomplishments all the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. And what are those accomplishments?
I like CMB, personally. Worked on her first Senate campaign. But she let us down. Honestly, what did she do to distinguish herself in the Senate?

We have lots of AA female heroines such as Barbara Lee and Maxine Waters. I wouldn't quite put CMB in that category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Maxine is my Girl
but her accomplishment was being the first AA senator. That's about it I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #40
51. Neo-cons started full smear investigation the moment she was sworn in
You didn't read post #22. She never got the chance to do anything, but she still had a good record on legislation she sponsored and co-cponsored. Check the CMB website for the whole list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. She did NOT play smart politics!
WTF was she thinking with that trip to Nigeria. Without at least getting an OK from the Clinton administration? STUPID! Even Jesse Jackson Jr. called it "ill-advised" and the CBC condemned the action. Her own constituency!

Not someone I want as President or Vice-President. She should have known better. The financial charges, I could have given less than a shit about. The money was paid back. End of story. But Nigeria... that was just wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #53
63. CMB wasn't perfect. GET HER!
7 trips to Nigeria were claimed by CMBs enemies. Only 3 were after 1992. The first was to meet her fiancees family, and she met Melson Mandela, Desmond Tutu, and several other important African leaders on that trip. The third trip was to go to the funeral of the son of the Nigerian dictator after that son was killed in a plane crash. She has "cover" on that trip as she was supposedly delivering backcannel messages for Clinton to the the dictator.

That leaves the trip to the dictator's son's wedding. That wasn't terribly bright. However, CMB and her fiancee each paid their own way the whole trip. Air fare, accomodations, etc. It's not a big error. It's one of those things that an apology should have been issued for, and then the issue disappeared. She did admit poor judgement. That should have been the end of it, but because CMB is an African American woman, it wasn't.

Again, compare what is expected of CMB to say, Gephardt? If Gephardt made a couple of trips to a corrupt country on his own dime, would we hear about it? Of course not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #63
66. Exactly. HUGE double standard. And imagine if George Bush did this. LOL!
Cmon....this was not worthy of the ruthless, rabid dog, racist polics that it became.

Why is it Dems feed on their own when their own is being attacked unfairly?

DOES NOT COMPUTE......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. And one more thing!
It's bad enough that so many ignore her as a candidate simply because she is black AND a woman! She's my 2nd choice and would be a wonderful VP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. I dismiss her as a VP candidate because
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 12:41 AM by tritsofme
she lost her IL Senate seat to a repuke. A state just a few years later gave a landslide to Gore, and now is Dem top to bottom.

If we're going to win the election, Illinois' 23 electoral votes cannot be in jeopardy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. She lost because she was wrongfully smeared for going to a
freaking funeral. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Does that negate my point? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark4VotingRights Donating Member (795 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #32
54. Nothing can negate your point.
'Cause you didn't really have one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #54
61. My point is that she would be a liability to the ticket,
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 02:19 AM by tritsofme
and we would be in danger of loosing a solid Democratic state, and more importantly, 23 electoral votes.

Those are the facts, regardless of how we got to this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. That isn't the major reason why she lost.
She lost because of concern on the part of voters about her then-fiancé Kgosie Matthews, an "ill-advised" (in the words of Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr.) trip to Nigeria, and questions about possible ties To General Abacha.

She's an extremely talented woman who was very stupid. IL is a democratic stronghold and the fact that she lost to a Republican moron like Peter Fitzerald has been a sore spot for many IL Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #35
52. She lost thanks to Fitzgerald/Rove smears
Rove coordiated all that Fitgerald stuff. You knew that didn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. Does NOT matter.
Attacks were expected. Rove did not send her to Nigeria. That was her and/or her then-fiance's decision. There were many ways Carol could have played it. She could have informed the Clinton administration of her desire to travel to Nigeria and made sure her ass was covered. As it was, NO ONE could defend her actions.

Not Clinton.

Not the CBC.

Not the party.

No one.

THAT'S the reason she lost. If you place yourself in a position where your own friends can't defend you, then you deserve what you get: in Carol's case, a loss of confidence on the part of IL voters.

And even with the trip, I think if she had just admitted it was ill-advised and moved on, she could have weathered the storm. But trying to defend the indefensive move was what sunk her, must like Kerry trying to defend his IWR vote is sinking him when all the public wants to hear him say is that he made a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhunt70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. ...
I dont think that was the jist of this post.

At least my response wasnt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. My post wasn't just a response to the original post
And it wasn't directed at ALL those who posted...just the majority, who are behaving like jackasses rather than donkeys, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. She defended Dean...
...and as everyone knows, CU, oh, I mean, FU, I mean, DU, doesn't tolerate that kind of behavior. You are either with Dean, or you are against him. Dotcha know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamondsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
41. No offense, but since you're so upset,
I wasn't at all bothered by her attempt to defend him. One thing that I did find a little odd was his reaction to it. Probably just me, but he seemed almost harsh with his response. Care to give me your impression of the exchange?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. Not to pile on lieberman, but he seems increasingly like
a guy who's losing it. I almost felt sorry for him when he wacked out on the question thing.

CMB seems fine to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
21. She's a "lovely lady" and I'm glad she's been there debate after debate
standing up for Women, Children and family concerns. She's also tough and has answered questions about what Bush should have done about Iraq and our Foreign Policy relations with out countries in a well-informed, down to earth rational way.

She's tops with me! And I'd vote for her in a minute but I know she no chance of making it in 2004. But as a Cabinet Postion, she would be great. Compare her to the females in Bush's Cabinet! No one could hold a candle or even a match to "M-B."

Even her smile is a joy to see. Compare that to the "glowering females" in the Bush crowd. Frankly everyone in the Bush Admin is a sour face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian_Expat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
29. Strong woman = "wacky"?!?
Oh, how much America has to learn. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Yup
we've got a long ways to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
50. Why isn't this thread locked yet?
If this was about Dean, Clark, or Kerry, it would have been locked minutes after it was created.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Printer70 Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #50
58. Why do we have to lock everything?
No harm, no foul. I'd rather err on the side of free speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
55. IBFTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Printer70 Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
56. I've been impressed with her
CMB is far more reasonable and articulate than the impression I got from news reports on her before I became acquainted with her through the debates. An impressive woman. She has no chance in hell of being nominated, but so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
64. Why? Because she defended Dean?
You should be asking: "What's up with Al Sharpton?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC