We got flashies, we got flashies!

[killtown]

This video clip is of the WTC 1 coming down. The camera is really shaky, but you can see some "delicious" little goodies in it.

The first thing you'll notice is some nice squibs pooping out.

But the real morsels are the FLASHIES* seen pooping near the corner of the building! It's hard to see at first, but watch the video clip a couple of times and focus on the corner of the building just right under the demolition wave coming down.


Video clip - Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop! :nuke:



(*demo charges)


Credit goes to Rox Dogg for the clip!

[MrMonk]

1. I think this belongs in the ninesies 'levensies forum.

[LA lady]

2. too sad

After listening to those tragic recordings on the news today, I can't stand to watch this.

[Tandalayo_Scheisskopf]

3. You got that thing on a sloooooow server!

n/t

[Suich]

4. No kidding!

I gave up after 4 minutes!

[sce56]

5. Nothing that new here seen those explosions for several years now

Look closely and you can see the jets of material being blasted out of the sides and the puffs of smoke in the head on view! This is just below the collapsing levels as demolition charges blast out of the tower as they cut out the support structures so the building will collapse taking us into a new war brought on by the lies and false flag ops of the war profiteers.



Got Broad Band watch the video Loose Change
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-51375819912882


Also see the call to reopen http://www.reopen911.org / they were sending out free videos watch and see how far down the rabbit hole this story goes! Watch the dramatic video as one of the World Trade Center Towers collapses
Play video (Quick Time, Real or Windows Media) http://reopen911.org/pictures_and_videos.htm#1

[bbinacan]

6. Oh good grief,

this crap is getting old.:tinfoilhat: :crazy: :eyes:

[DemInDistress]

7. possibly more flashies here...

http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem3/
scroll down to the set of 5 gif.(?) frames. Pay close attention to the 5th picture in motion. On the east side of WT2 just below the debris field crashing to earth look closely under the shroud I see millisecond flashes like that used in controlled demo.Watch it a few times while looking closely for the flashes.

Also, check out this flash.


edit to add this better look of the flashes: http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem3/flashindex.php look at the east side but don't blink.

[kerry_s]

8. No flashes at all

i do not see any real flashes in this video, if you focus on the building left to the towers you will also see flashes...

[Jazz2006]

9. Of course not

Because there aren't any.

From what I can tell in the couple of weeks I've been here, killtown posts a whole lot of crap that he hopes nobody will actually look at with an open mind, because if they did, they'd see that it doesn't support his propositions and suppositions.

Or at least, he's hoping that anyone who does look at it is willing to suspend their disbelief long enough to buy into the ridiculous theories that he puts forward.

Then when someone does actually look at it with an open mind and says, gee, that doesn't seem to support your premise, there is someone else around to accuse you of being a "zombie" (a new definition of which I learned tonight).

Sheesh.

[SidDithers]

11. Excellent observation...

and welcome to DU!

Sid

[Jazz2006]

19. Thanks. n/t

[libertypirate]

13. You know what's funny about about people who think belief ranks

above fact, they are zombies.

Every post you have made seems to make reference to 9-1 1 information presented as being crap, not worthy to you, and of course the discrediting of the source and not the information. Which is the fall back position of the power mongers; deny, discredit, and distract. Kind of like the loss of power when you start ranting about them and not their facts.

Your self perception of being open is rather laughable.

The peer pressure junk, laughable.

The framing of the posters mindset, laughable.

The idea that you can bring your beliefs and tout them as fact, laughable.

In summary your acting like a jerk, and have shown nothing but contempt for anything other than your point of view.

It’s disgraceful and not necessary to judge anything, it is essential that it is known.

Killtown keep up the damn good work your doing, well smoke’m out!

[Jazz2006]

20. Not so.

I don't know how to cut and paste your post in sections to respond to it, but, simply put, the entire post is untrue.

And, interestingly enough, you appear to be engaging in the very behaviour that you wrongly accuse me of.

Go figure.

But if it makes you feel better to slag me off instead of addressing reality, knock yourself out.

[Make7]

21. Did you just admonish someone else for acting like a jerk?

Remember this?

libertypirate said:

Jet fuel will not cannot burn 6 weeks after it is all burned up. You 'official story' people need a really big wake the fuck up enema and then a good slap for stupidity. Yes I said you are fucking too incompetent if you don't get this point to comment on it. Heat doesn't just show up on it's own, it also has to be forced into what ever recieves it by higher temperatures. These facts make the 'official fairy tale' plain as the nose on my face bullshit.

- Make7

[mirandapriestly]

35. well, they don't even HAVE a point of view

except to ridicule that which they hardly even know anything about. There's a new crop of ignorant debunkers, worse than the old guard.

[simonm]

28. Video is not needed

Even if you disregard the video evidence, there are still many reliable witnesses that saw the demolition flashes within the building.

It is not a ridiculous theory when there is supporting evidence.

[simonm]

29. The flashes are there

It may require a few reviews cause of the sun light and shaking. Keep your eye on the building.

Full Color Video:

http://italy.indymedia.org/uploads/2005/04/wtc1-detonations-2.avi

[LARED]

10. the real morsels are the FLASHIES* seen pooping

hmmmm

[SidDithers]

12. Was expecting a Girls Gone Wild post! nt

Sid

[eomer]

14. Sure looks like demolition flashes to me.

Starting at about 5 seconds in, just to the right of the corner, there are flashes that start near the top of the unobscured area and proceed in a fairly straight line and even timing down the face. There are also squibs in the same general time and area as the flashes.

I see only two possible explanations:

1. demolition flashes
   
2. falsification of the video
   

Edit to add: there is also an event to the left of the corner (in the period from 7 to 9 seconds in). This event consists of a flash followed immediately by a squib. This flash is in the proper time and place to make it consistent with (a part of) the sequencing of the other flashes that are to the right of the corner.

[greyl]

15. Squeeze the top of a bag of Doritos

and thrill at the poopies coming out the bottom after you squeeze.

[Beelzebud]

16. Thank you. This is simple physics.......

I'm about ready to make a scale model of teh trade center and drop a huge weight on top of it, and video tape it in slow-motion so these people can see that even a small structure collapsing form teh top down will cause pressure that will blow out the windows directly below the area collapsing.

This is simple fucking physics.

[simonm]

30. I'd love to see your experiment

How the fire traveled down 70+ floors in a hermetically sealed chamber with limited oxygen (Concrete core - 70+ floors from impact) would be very interesting.

I'll be waiting.

[greyl]

31. Fire?

There's no fire in a bag of Doritos®.
Do you understand why the bottom of a bag of Doritos® blows out when you squeeze the top?

[Make7]

33. You could not possibly be more mistaken.

greyl said:

There's no fire in a bag of Doritos®.

No fire? Have you ever had these?

   

It says so right on the label. You can see it in there.

I'm hungry....

:) Make7

[greyl]

37. Hah! Way to be there. :)

I considered making a similar joke because I've got a bag of Spicy Nacho with the same fire, but I went with the ® absurdity instead.

The picture shows Craig Ferguson's show from tonight as evidence.
Not that an expert Pshopper couldn't fake it.

[simonm]

17. Webfairy is a known disinfo site

I don't trust anything they present.

[eomer]

18. Do you think the video has been edited?

It looks to me like demolition flashes but it seems like it would be pretty easy to edit the video and put some flashes in there. Is that what you're thinking? Or is it the interpretation of the video that you disagree with?

[simonm]

22. It looks like real demo flashes

I'm just being cautious cause the link was from webfairy.


Same high res video in color:

(Under NORTH TOWER DEMOLITION)

http://guardian.150m.com/wtc/videos.htm

http://italy.indymedia.org/uploads/2005/04/wtc1-detonations-2.avi

[killtown]

23. That's my link that I uploaded

on MY site made by Rox Dogg. you calling me a disinfo agent?

[simonm]

25. different link

The video you provided was different and is from

http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc/wtc-flashinator.wmv

(your video was converted to black and white. Probably for magnifying the demo flashes.)

There are many 911 hoaxes promoted by web sites like webfairy. I'm just being skeptical when information comes from such sources.

http://www.oilempire.us/inplanesite.html
http://www.oilempire.us/pod.html

[killtown]

26. What part of this do you not understand?

What does it say after the ".com/"?

http://thewebfairy.com/killtown


and what part of "Credit goes to Rox Dogg for the clip!" did you not understand either???

[simonm]

27. It is about credibility

I'm sorry if you think my opinion of webfairy is unfair.

[greyl]

32. Not to everyone, sadly.

There's some weird phenomenom where the 'different' people from the webfairy use serious terms like flashies, poopies, and doohickies. Wonder why?

[libertypirate]

34. Great I have other video's that show sqibs and flashes

The best is

--_close-up_of_south_tower_collapse.mpeg

or
--_close-up_of_south_tower_collapse.mpg

In quicktime because you can frame through...

[Debunking911]

24. Not so fast...

It look like one of the aluminum clading pieces free falling with the rest of the debris outside the building. Also note that the perimeter columns are free falling and the collapse is happening way above the free falling columns. That video proves the building never fell as fast as free fall.

The aluminum clading was seen falling a few seconds before the collapse along with glass from due to the columns being pulled in by the trusses.

Fireman's quotes are being taken out of context. Sure fireman saw flashes but there are other explanations besides explosives. At least one fireman said he thought it make have been electrical explosions.

http://www.debunking911.com

[libertypirate]

36. Your really not comming hear to suggest we have a contextual issue...

Oh please...

You want context here you go...

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

I know your not even going to look at it...

How about the Gov of New York Pataki saying all the concrete in the buildings had been pulverized?
And that there was no concrete in the pile of rubble.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x79168

Oh and if your in the mood to actually look at a more scientific perspective try this...

http://www.st911.org/

[Debunking911]

40. I've seen the sites.

What Jones doesn't want you to know is concrete has a different stress level when it bends. The stronger the concrete the more it will explode when fractured. You can COMPRESS concrete more than you can BEND concrete. Jones uses the compression stats for his paper knowing full well he is misleading people.

He just started to change it to take out the most flagrent errors. He uses Hoffmans "Pyroclasic flow" hypthesis which means the air was 212 degrees F. Did anyone complain about hot air that day? Some were one block away and would have been pouched.

This nut case wrote a paper saying Jesus came to america... I kid you not... He uses photos of art which show circles in the hands of a deity while takes your eye away from the other circles all over the art with his circles around what he wants you to see.

Why did he seek a marxist economist journal to peer review his work? Why not a structural engineering journal? Why not one even in a country that hates us?

It's not lost on me that Tucker Carlson had him on his show. This is making a real investigation into Bush's real crimes harder. They will conflate this with the inivestigation into lying us into war. It's already begun.

[SidDithers]

39. Welcome to DU!...

we can use more voices of reason around here.

Sid

[Debunking911]

41. Thanks

Nice to see I'm not alone. :)

[Peter Frank]

38. Why Does the Video Start Out in Color...

...and quickly turn to B&W where editing can have a Field day?

911 was an inside job; but this particular video (edited in black & white) proves nothing.

[Debunking911]

42. The mother of all electrical systems...

Why wouldn't you see flashes as transformers and other electrical systems short? The building had high voltage trunks running the lenth of the building. There were a number of floors which had elecrical substations in it. A building with this kind of electrical system collapsing is bound to make a spark or two don't you think?

http://www.geocities.com/debunking911/explosions.htm

[DemInDistress]

43. even more "flashies" these are indisputable.

http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem3/ scroll down and click this link Video: 911.wtc.2.demolition.east.5.enl.slow.2.wmv

watch it a few times. this video has slow motion reverse look at the east side of WT2 where the collapse begins. special thanks to terrorize.dk for this..
pancaked (rotf) CONTROLLED DEMOLITION BROUGHT DOW THE WTC