Webster Griffin Tarpley Launches New Radio Show!

[reprehensor]

WORLD CRISIS RADIO

with Webster Griffin Tarpley


A weekly overview of world intelligence plus an in-depth interview from Washington DC


This Week's Guest: GERHARD WISNEWSKI of Munich, Germany, author and producer of books and television broadcasts on the events of September 11, 2001.


STARTS SATURDAY, MARCH 11 at 4-6 PM EASTERN TIME;

3-5 PM CENTRAL; 2-4 PM M! OUNTAIN; 1-3 PM PACIFIC; 9-11 PM UTC/GMT; 10 PM - MIDNIGHT CENTRAL EUROPEAN TIME


STREAMING INTERNET AT REPUBLIC BROADCASTING NETWORK WEBSITE http://www.rbnlive.com/


SHORTWAVE FOR TEXAS, CALIFORNIA, AUTRALIA AND WORLWIDE ON 11.915 MHZ IN 25 METER BAND


LOCAL LOW-POWER FM in 150 locations


Call-ins from inside the US and Canada: 800-313-9443 toll free.


Please forward this announcement to your lists.

[Beam Me Up]

1. Thanks!

Will the shows also be archived? Hope so.

[reprehensor]

2. He is kicking ass!

Tune in, it's righteous!

http://www.rbnlive.com/listen.html

[laruemtt]

3. thank you so much

for giving us this link - this is great! :hi:

[reprehensor]

4. It was a great show!

I had no idea that Wisnewski was under such censorship in Germany!

Did not know that Der Spiegel made a hard-right turn!

Here is the film that got Wisnewski in so much trouble;

(Scroll down to "File 911 Unsolved" links)
http://question911.com/links.php

Pretty tame compared to other more recent films, but when you consider that this was broadcast on a major state-owned TV station in Germany, it definitely turned some heads. The first such documentary to be broadcast so widely to the public. But, it does feature brief interviews with the Mayor of Shanksville, who says his brother was at the crash site right after Flight 93 went down, and could see no evidence of a plane crash, just a hole in the ground.

Barry Zwicker's film has been "broadcast" on cable in Canada and wherever else his channel is carried.

[Beam Me Up]

5. Reprehensor,

What did you make of the last few minutes of the interview where Tarpley begins talking about the "blue scree" manipulation of some 9/11 video AND the fact that Wisnewski has written a book on the Moon Landings being faked? I have my own thoughts but I want to hear yours first.

[reprehensor]

6. You're gonna sandbag me!

Wah!

I think he's right. We don't need "gatekeepers".

But... what he called for is an executive summary of what the "digital manipulation" crowd is on about. He wants some definite points that he can examine and address or rebut.

Wisnewski seems to think that there is no "digital manipulation", that indeed, a jet airliner did smack into the second tower, and nobody has been f*n with the pix.

My guess is that if Tarpley does a show about Wisnewski's "Moon Landing Video Hoax" work, it will be down the road a piece. Like, WAY down the road a piece.

I mean, they did make it.

http://www.space.com/news/spacehistory/apollo_mirror.html

[Beam Me Up]

7. Actually, I'm not going to "sandbag" you.

I have to say, though, that that really threw me for a loop. I actually got quite depressed and upset after hearing that part of the interview. I don't understand, why begin this radio program with someone who has written a book about the moon landings being faked? I've been following deep politics since long before 9/11 -- in other words, I'm not a newcomer to this whole weirdness. I appreciated very much what Tarpley had to say in the first hour. But when he brought this other stuff in it had a devastating effect on me and I had to wonder if that wasn't INTENTIONAL. I'm not saying it is, I'm just saying I had to think that through. WTF!?

Gate keepers: Yeah, I agree, we don't need any. But there is a very real problem here. To me the REAL Gate Keepers are those who a) either completely DENY the accumulated evidence that strongly and almost irrefutably suggests that 9/11 was an "inside" job (or that, in any case, the 'official' story can not possibly be true) or b) DISCREDIT the work of 9/11 researches by creating distractions which have the effect of both fracturing the movement and marginalizing the movement as a whole.

I realize the "b" part is problematic. I, for example, do not see any evidence that a 757 crashed into the Pentagon and this places me at odds with founding member activists within the movement who feel that the accumulated evidence to support this PoV isn't strong enough. I find that statement simply amazing -- but there we have it.

The point is that by the end of Tarpley's program I felt demoralized and frustrated to the point I wrote him a rather scathing email (that I have yet to send). I respect you and all the work you've been doing in this arena, so thus my post above.

I'm not interested in 'sandbagging' anyone; I just want us to find our way through this house of mirrors to something at least approaching truth.

Thank you for your reply.

[reprehensor]

8. There is a chorus...

...of very insistent "blue screeners". I think Tarpley felt he had to at least mention it or be himself accused of "gatekeeping".

The majority of the interview was about Wisnewski's suppression (which I didn't know about) and his prior work on the RAF (which I'd like to learn more about).

If Tarpley "goes for the moon" before the end of the year, I'll be shocked, shocked, I tell you! Plenty of other guests out there. It wouldn't hurt to let Tarpley know how you feel. I can't seem to get in touch with the guy, maybe you'll have better luck.

[reprehensor]

9. Real news.

Once a week.