Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NASA and footage of FIRST plane hitting WTC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:33 AM
Original message
NASA and footage of FIRST plane hitting WTC
Is this a new revelation? Short article....but drops the bombshell that NASA had live coverage of the attacks on the WTC.... the FIRST plane. Also, that it would have been possible for Bush to have viewed this as it happened in the limo on the way to the school?

I posted this in the 9/11 forum, but felt it was important enough to post it here also.


http://prairieweather.typepad.com/big_blue_stem/2006/02/live_coverage_o.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. if that is true, then there are apparently a LOT of people who need to be
brought up on a whole host of charges, including treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. When you think about it, it makes sense.....
I'd never considered that NASA could be mixed up in this whole NSA, wiretapping, spying debacle. Makes perfect sense though....think of the amazing things they can do with satellites.... makes you go hmmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Makes me go hmmmm, too.

"A caller" to a talk show offered his word that NASA monitored the strike.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, I'll need more evidence than a guy calling Mike Malloy
There's a lot of bullshit artists out there who call talk radio. Shit, Art Bell made a whole career out of them. I didn't hear Malloy yesterday, so I don't know what the guy said, but you gotta consider that this is a "some guy said" story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I wasn't vouching for the story....
Would take a pretty creative person in my mind to come up with this story out of whole cloth. And face it, we all know how whistleblowers get treated these days.

It just struck a nerve with me....it's a plausible scenario. I was also interested to see if anyone else had heard about this before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. We knew when the first plane went off radar.
A competent defense system would have instantly scanned for it and begun tracking. This isn't a big surprise. Neither is knowing that Bush could have done something and didn't. He didn't help New Orleans, either.

9/11/01. The day of the American Reichstag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. So he was watching TV?
"The morning of 9/11, he was working at one of NASA's consoles, with video monitor on, when the attacks happened. The first plane hitting WTC came over live -- live -- on his monitor. "

The low earth orbitting satellites that might be able to view something like this are only over a given spot for a couple of minutes. Satellites in Geosynchronous orbit are not likely to be able to resolve and track anything that far.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. bush was more likely to be watching cartoons than to be watching an intel
feed from NASA.

Or porn...

I'm just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. I seem to recall there was unusual trading activity prior to the attack
but don't remember the specifics. It might have been some unusually large short positions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Record put options on Boeing, UA and AA stock
Ranging from 5x to 12x or so normal? Put options are a bet that the price of stock will drop.

This is just what I heard in a 9/11 conspiracy documentary. I don't know if there was another plausible reason, if other airlines showed similar activity, things like that. For that matter I don't even know if it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. Something along those lines.
It was unconfirmed info that I vaguely remember reading about after the fact. If it's true, the transactions would seem highly traceable in the transparency-for-proles hi-tech world we seem to be living in. Would those that have the access to systems that 'illegally spy' on financial transactions desire to audit the alleged unusual activity?

MIHOP or LIHOP seems unlikely only when those in power can be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andino Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sounds like Disinformation to me... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. How so? For what purpose? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. To make us look foolish. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I don't see how it makes us look foolish in any way.
It was a twist on 9/11 that I had never heard before. I didn't post it with the idea that everyone was supposed to accept it as fact. It was an interesting tidbit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Right...
...but we seem to latch onto such tidbits and soon they are catechism of the grand MIHOP conspiracy.

You were just reporting it as a curious statement, but soon others will echo it, and it will have been corroborated by a friend of a friend's uncle's sister who works for NASA and is afraid for her life.

It is like a demented game of "telephone".

And I think these things are sewn among us to discredit anything we might have to say about the actual truth of 9/11, which is that this government let it happen though depraved indifference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. And who do you think is spreading these stories?
I think it's fascinating how caught up in conspiracy theories most of us are.... not just about 9/11.... but EVERYTHING these days. And how many of these theories end up having a least a modicum of truth. In fact, isn't it a conspiracy theory that people are spreading disinfo in order to keep us from figuring out the true extent of the conspiracy surrounding 9/11? Like I said.... it's fascinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. My favorite conspiracy theory
http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/

This is why the government is promoting consspiracy theories.:P :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
40. Some are just nutcases, but some are moles.
We are infested here with a particularly vicious sort of thug; The freeper mole.

They come in here, pretending to be one of us, and then they do their best to twist things, to sew disinformation in the hopes of getting use to swallow a particularly ridiculous fairy tale that they can then go back to Free Republic and elsewhere to mock.

Others, with similar motives are paid GOP political operatives. These were at work here on a couple of occasions. One was the Andy Stephenson affair. The other was the Primary battles for the 2004 presidential nomination. These thugs were the ones who were spreading nasty stuff about Clark, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harald Ragnarsson Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. So, people who DON'T believe what you do are freeper moles?
Sounds like going from painting with a broad brush to using a paint sprayer to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
staticstopper Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. huh?
<i>that this government let it happen though depraved indifference.</i>

They must surely know exatly what indifference will do and then PLAN around it.

Would they leave it to fate? I think they have control issues.

I'm sorry, but Incompetence Theorists and It's Just the Money and Oil Theorists are not that believeable to me after Katrina.

They seek power alone.

I wish I could think that, I might be able to sleep at night.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #22
38. Depraved Indifference
is a willfully evil and reckless policy of conduct that is in disregard to the obvious baleful consequences to life and limb of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PrairieW Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
37. Show audio
The audio is now available. I've added the link to the original post at Prairie Weather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. Thank you for linking the audio to your site. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. Welcome to DU PrairieW
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
staticstopper Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. and playing nice and
sane with these people have done a lot of good.

Did you say this sort of thing to people who questioned the 2000 SC ruling that installed king baby george and set forth most of these problems?

I remember that it was David Corn I think saying something "how dare we question the official story and make us look like a bunch of grassy knollers...sure they are Conservatives but they are not crazy!"

look where we are at now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Been there recently eh?
BUt in a case like this I've encountered numerous cases where stories are mis-heard, mis-interpreted, passed on and stretched farther. It may have started with someboidy calling a friend at NASA on 9-11 AM to see if they knew what was happening: "Oh yeah, we have it on the TV monitor" - story goes from there.

Certainly the internet can accelerate the process, but I think that we may also be in a similar situation to deep Cold War Soviet Union. With very little honest information coming from media sources, all kinds of strange stuff works through the rumor process. Sorting out BS gets hard when it requires expertise outside of our specialties and the truth itself gets strange enough itself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. No shortage of people making stuff up
Edited on Fri Feb-24-06 02:59 AM by ThoughtCriminal
Or just have pet theories that they are trying to pump up. I don't discredit everything, but I have a pretty good knowledge of celestial mechanics and telescope optics. The story is extremely unlikely.

:shrug:

edited for bizarre spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. If it's made up at least it's original....LOL
How do celestial mechanics and telescope optics pertain to the use of spy satellites? I must admit that I have zero knowledge about their operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Optics and orbits
Telescope optics are what spy satellites use to view the Earth visually (there are also spy satellites that monitor communications). Celestial mechanics is the math that describes the orbit of a satellite around another mass (in this case the Earth).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Gotcha.....
Thanks for the basics. And I appreciate that you didn't go into alot of detail... stuff like that makes my eyes glaze over....LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #21
36. How about aerial photography?
No one said it was satellite footage, people here just assumed that because when they think NASA they think space. But NASA is also heavily involved in atmospheric research as well as aerial photgraphy, and has operated UAV's capable of beaming back live pictures since the mid-90's or even earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. True......
You're absolutely right that at least I assumed the guy was referencing satellites because it mentioned a live feed. How else would they get a "live" feed and not just photographs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
39. The guy also said the Mossad took the pictures
Does that make it any clearer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. Mike Mallloy needs to do a better job screening his callers. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. You're assuming it's false....
Fact is.... none of us will ever know what really happened on 9/11. And lots of us have very different opinions about what we THINK happened. We have no way of proving or disproving any of our theories... certainly not to the satisfaction of everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. So I'm assuming you believe its better..
..to assume that its TRUE?

No. This sounds like 100% B.S. Just because it "sounds" good to you, doesn't mean there's a shred of truth to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #32
43. I'm not assuming it's true or false.
I just think I try to keep an open mind about these things. Like I said elsewhere... we don't have the ability to prove it true or false. I doubt we ever will. However, I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. we should not assume it is true unless it's verified. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
49. I'd bet $1000 on it being false.
99% of this bogus shit people say about 9/11 is made-up bogus shit.

9/11 is where a conspiracy of terrorists from mostly Saudi Arabia, financed by the Saudi Royal Family and maybe Osama Bin Laden, hijacked four airliners, and succeeded in bringing down the WTC 1, 2 and 7 and nearly trashing the whole Pentagon. The governmental and military response was pathetic, and reflected Depraved Indifference on the part of an administration more interested in looting the treasury than in keeping the country safe, despite specific warnings of this sort of threat exactly. And just maybe they were hoping that a terrorist event would allow them to pass repressive and fascistic laws and facilitate their looting, and so did less than nothing to stop it.

EVERYTHING else about this is a nutjob conspiracy theory, and the people who seriously believe it need to have their bullshit detectors tuned up.

I'm sorry, but I think you are loons if you believe anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
28. So Bush happened to be watching a random NASA feed in his limo?
I think all he does in that limo is try to sleep it off and pull himself together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. It would also mean that MonkeyBoy is an Academy award level actor!!
If he was scratching his ass and farting enroute to that school, and watching the planes hit the tower, he then had to stroll in, shake hands with all the teachers and hangers on, and then sit on his ass reading MY PET GOAT, and then FEIGN concern when Andy Card waddles in to give him the bad news...not once, but TWICE....well, all that eye-darting and jaw clenching and flop-sweatedness ain't something they teach at the Actor's Studio, now, is it?

It wouldn't surprise me if NASA has some images, but I doubt that MonkeyBoy saw them contemporaneously with the event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. The thing is...
Bush claimed to have seen the first plane crash on TV BEFORE he went to the school, but claimed he thought "what a terrible pilot". He used that story as part of his "no one could have predicted..." defense to show that when he saw it he still didnt immediately think terrorism.

So what this story is apparently doing is confirming Bush's own statement that he saw the first crash on TV before he went into the school.

I myself am sceptical simply because it fits that Bush statement a little too well; a little too conveniently. NASA had the technology, and the ability to do what is claimed, but it just seems a little too convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #35
45. He is not the first asshole to gild the lily or embellish a tale to make i
sound better. He is one of those clowns that derives their own importance and attention by either being there or being an eyewitness--as though portentious events WAIT for INDIVIDUALS!

It was clear to me, though, even, from his mangled remarks, that his reference was the situation room they had set up inside the school--not the limo or anywhere else. He didn't see the stupid thing happen, he saw the TODAY SHOW replays, like half of America did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
30. if true, and can be proven . . . The Smoking Gun of 9/11 . . .
Edited on Fri Feb-24-06 04:22 AM by OneBlueSky
and knowing what I know about 9/11 -- and what's happened since -- I have more reasons to believe this than to doubt it . . .

one of the things that has most disturbed me about 9/11 is the inaction of the Secret Service in response to this "attack on America" . . . if indeed no one knew what was going on, Bush himself could easily have been in mortal danger since his location was known, and planes were being hijacked (supposedly) all over the place . . . but instead of rushing the president out of there and to a secure location (e.g. Air Force One), the Secret Service allowed him to sit there reading for 20 minutes, and then allowed him to remain at the school for some time after that . . .

this inaction to protect the president has never made any sense to me, and it has never been explained . . . I'm pretty sure the question was never even brought up by the 9/11 Commission, which seems a pretty major oversight -- or an intentional omission . . .

of course, it would all make sense if they KNEW that the president wasn't in any danger . . . but how would they know that? . . .

strongly recommended . . . because if this is true, EVERYTHING else about 9/11 and its aftermath finally makes sense . . . and George Bush goes to prison for a long, long time . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
31. Sorry, I don't believe this for a second.
Sounds like a fantasy story conjured up by a conspiratorialist tinfoil-hatter. If it were true, why would it take four years for someone to mention it for the first time? And a caller to a leftist/liberal radio show, at that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
34. Where in the article did the caller say it was satellite footage?
I sure don't see it anywhere in the article...

I hate to point this out to Americans seeing as I am not one of you, but NASA stands for National Aeronautical and Space Administration. In this case, emphasis on Aeronautical. That means aircraft, as well as spacecraft. NASA has been involved with aerial photography for quite some time, not to mention development of reconaissance drones, such as Pathfinder and Pathfinder Plus - both operational with NASA prior to Sept 11 and capable of carrying imaging equipment to extremely high altitudes.

So what does the military use UAV's for? To fill in the gaps created by the limited time satellites can be over any one area. NASA uses them for the same reason.

Here is some interesting information for you: NASA has a unit called DART or Disaster Assistance and Rescue Team. Did you know DART was one of the organisations that responded to the collapse of the WTC buildings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #34
44. I don't think I'd heard that before..... tell me more... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harald Ragnarsson Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
46. Naudet Brothers hooked up on feed?
Those firemen checking the gas leak always looked kind of stiff to me. "Look sharp, the President is watching".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
50. Thanks for starting this thread
I heard that caller on Mike's show, and have meant to follow it up if I could, and then promptly forgot.

I don't think it's been mentioned yet in this thread, and it's possible that I wasn't completely awake when I was listening to Mike... but didn't the caller also say something about the camera having been located in WTC7? Did I dream that part?

Also, it's so interesting to me that the same people who use the argument against L/MIHOP that too many people would have to be involved and so many people can't keep a secret, also respond to callers such as this one with labels like "nutcase" etc. I have heard numerous cases of people claiming certain pieces of knowledge, that are inevitably ridiculed (no wonder more people don't come forward huh?)

Gotta have it both ways.

Just interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC