Flight77. info Update

[MrSammo1]

Flight77. info Update

Jury selection in Zacarias Moussaoui's sentencing hearing begins feb 6th. at this hearing the govt will show the jury the CDROM they have of flight 77 impacting the pentagon. It's the govt's hope that these graphic images (having never been seen before) will help shock the jury into delivering the death sentence to Moussaoui (the so-called '20th hijacker')...

I speculate that the judge in our lawsuit has been waiting so many months to make his final ruling due to the coming Moussaoui trial. once the govt shows the video to the jury, that will end their argument for not giving us the CDROM. this may actually be the situation. if so, say HELLO to the soon-to-be rejuvenated 911 truth movement.

http://www.flight77.info/

Can you say Dreamworks?

[LARED]

1. You view this as something to rejuvenate the 9/11 movement?

Why?

If the video of flight 77 impacting the Pentagon is going to be shown to a group of jurors, do you think it's going to show something other than flight 77?

Unlikely.

So if it does indeed show flight 77 impacting the pentagon (imagine that) it will put to bed some near and dear CT theories rather than spark interest?

[bronco2121]

8. it'll spark 'something'

it'll get much more analysis than the current 5 frames. it'll be shown on the news networks (CNN's jamie macintyre is following this FOIA)... it'll just be nuts in the best way, i think.

it will spark new interest in 911 critical analysis, and bring more people to the side of, 'yeah, so i guess it was a 757' - which really only serves to replace their interest and time on other more important issues... it's my dream that this little bit of effort can help crack 911 and end the 'war on terrorism' - BEFORE bush gets evicted on iraq & spying. to me - this is all about timing.

if we get the CD ROM, i'm going to throw a party and you're all invited.

b.

[MrSammo1]

10. I don't believe in

Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, Gods, or magic jets.

You can't change the crime scene with a fake video. (no vertical stabilizer mark)

But I'd be curious to see the full length lie.

[MercutioATC]

2. If the video DOES show a 757 hitting the Pentagon can we move on?

...or will it be dismissed as a forgery by our resident CTists?

[MakeItSo]

3. no need to get hung up on the details

there is more than enough evidence to say, beyond a reasonable doubt, that our government is lying to us. Do you agree, MercutioATC?

[MercutioATC]

4. Seeing a 757 in the video would be a pretty big detail, don't you agree?

I'm asking if the Pentagon CTists will let the issue drop and admit they're wrong if the video shows a 757 hitting the Pentagon.

[jschurchin]

5. If they provide a...........

documented chain of evidence from the time the tape was removed from the machine on 9-11-01 until it is shown in the courtroom, then YES.
Remember DOCUMENTED CHAIN of EVIDENCE.

[MercutioATC]

6. The Court won't accept the video without a valid chain of evidence.

If they present a video with a 757 in it, it'll be authentic.

[jschurchin]

7. Agreed, I guess we....

just have to wait and see.

[MrSammo1]

12. A video

won't change the physical facts. It will only draw more attention to the lie.

[MercutioATC]

15. So I won't see you complaining about them not releasing the video, right?

[MrSammo1]

18. There's no videos to release

unless you consider the wall of the Pentagon blowing up, evidence that a 757 hit it?

[MercutioATC]

19. Weren't there a LOT of undisclosed Pentagon videos?

We've all read about the gas station and the hotel that had their surveillance vidoes confiscated ny the FBI. We know that the Pentagon had more than one security camera looking that way.

(whether any of these cameras, which are usually set to focus on a particular door or gas pump or walkway would actually have shown anything aside)

Doesn't most of the CT crowd here clamor for the release of those videos?

[stickdog]

21. Yes, of course we want ALL the confiscated evidence released.

Are you going to threaten us with Flight 93's flight data recorder, the Huffman Aviation records Jeb flew away with the morning of 9/12, the SEC records concerning who made how much off suspicious 9/11 investments, the 911 tape of the guy hiding in Flight 93's bathroom, and the WTC-7 basement steel next?

[MercutioATC]

22. What would be the point?

Some here (I haven't seen you agree with them yet) have stated that if the videos don't show what they want them to show, they're just going to claim they're fakes.

[MrSammo1]

25. You don't seem to get it...........

The facts are already in. No 757 hit the Pentagon. We already have the proof. If they had released the videos right after 911, maybe they could be considered valid. But they didn't. Instead they gave us the five frames of fiction. It's 2006, plenty of time to put together a couple of fake videos.

[MercutioATC]

28. I do get it and your opinion is just that...an OPINION.

There is plenty of evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon. Some can see that. Some prefer to cherry-pick evidence to support their little CTs.

[MrSammo1]

30. Reality isn't an opinion

the physics of a 757 crash isn't there.

Therefore the story is a lie.

[MercutioATC]

33. What does that picture show?

Does it show more than civil engineers who examined the actual site would have seen? Why not just READ the ASCE report? There's a lot more evidence than can be gained by looking at some smoke-obscured photos.

http://www.pubs.asce.org/ceonline/ceonline03/0203feat.html

[MrSammo1]

26. ...........

.

[rman]

9. some claim a 757 is visible in the infamous 5 frame pentagon sequence

wrt to this particular video: we'll cross that bridge when we get there.

[MrSammo1]

11. It would have to be

a fake.

The photos of the crime scene tell a different tale.

[MercutioATC]

13. THAT'S what I expected!

"WE WANT THE VIDEO RECORDING!!! IF THE GOVERNMENT HASN'T RELEASED IT, IT MUST NOT SHOW A 757!"

and

"IF IT DOESN'T SHOW A 757, IT'S A FAKE!"


If you're not going to believe the video when you see it, what's the point of asking for it???

:eyes:

[savemefromdumbya]

14. any videos of the phantom 77 will be like the Osama fake videos

[MercutioATC]

16. Thank you.

You're doing wonders for my contention that, even if confronted with contrary proof that THEY THEMSELVES ASKED FOR, some CTists will only see what they want to see. They'll keep shrieking "Conspiracy!" regardless of the evidence.

[savemefromdumbya]

17. the problem is this NOT a conspiracy

it is about time people realized a large jumbo plane (77) did NOT slam into the wall of the Pentagon. No one needs proof - it just did not happen period!

[MercutioATC]

20. Even if the video evidence shows that a 757 DID crash into the Pentagon?

Are you SO married to your conspiracy theories that you won't believe verified contrary evidence?

[savemefromdumbya]

23. actually if you would have been there then you would know

no tinfoil here sorry to disappoint

[MercutioATC]

24. You were there?

If not, then by your own criterion, you don't know either, right?

[MrSammo1]

27. miracles

don't happen.

[MercutioATC]

29. I'm not talking about miracles. I'm talking about video evidence.

You klnow, the video evidence that some CTists here have been screaming for for years. I just want to know why they's demand it and then state ahead of time that they won't believe it if it shows a 757 hitting the Pentagon.

[MrSammo1]

31. You can't change

the crime scene. No jet hit the Pentagon on 911. Any videos shown now can't be considered real.

[MercutioATC]

32. I'd encourage you to read the ASCE report, but you seem unwilling to do so

Your contention that the hole is too small is completely false. There was 120' of damage to the facade of the Pentagon (consistent with wing impacts). What missile has a 120' wingspan?