|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 04:05 PM Original message |
"Use of Small Hydrogen Bombs" - sure would explain some loose ends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Similar Rates Of Expansion-EXP & HYD. Bomb. Can't Slow Or Distribute HYD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 05:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. The core was melted, then gravity took over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 07:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Explain the physics that allow you to focus an atomic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 01:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Yes, How Do You Focus A Nuclear Blast & Set 10,000 Shaped Charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 03:07 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. how to focus a nuclear blast is explained - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 12:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. No Explanation For Focusing Can Be Found At Your Links-Where Is It? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 12:22 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. It's in the dozen or so pages behind the links i provided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 01:40 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Quoted Snip Doesn't Explain How. Conventional Explosives Well Distributed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 02:20 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. In essence it's the same principal as traditional shaped charge, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 04:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
37. Wrong detail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. Deleted message |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 06:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
23. i should say: failing core as main mechanism of collapse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
4. That would explain the thousands dying of radiation sickness.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 07:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Come'on hack89 don't you know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 08:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. That was my thought... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 11:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Who's keeping track? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 02:41 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Ummm, NYC hospitals, maybe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 01:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
32. Who's tracking the hospitals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 11:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. Nice try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 11:22 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. The AMA, maybe? Possibly the CDC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 12:35 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. So which ones are tracking 9/11 radiation poisoning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 08:32 AM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Since there IS no "9/11 radiation poisoning", none. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 09:55 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. "1,700 Sue Over 9/11 Sickness" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Nobody said the illnesses were caused by background radiation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 08:29 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. It usually takes a decade or two before they'll admit it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 10:43 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Who is they? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 06:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Deleted message |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 11:37 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. IF that was an above-ground test of an atomic device, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSammo1 (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 10:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. I'm not saying they don't..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 04:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
36. What are you trying to say? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSammo1 (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 10:42 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. What's the government........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 11:19 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. You're only making sense to yourself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSammo1 (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 05:57 PM Response to Reply #42 |
52. It's a waste of time talking to a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 08:06 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Quite well, but not for posting on a little internet forum... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. Man, those photographs sure look like the same thing is happening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 11:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Yes they do. Chilling, isn't it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 11:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. Sorry, there are explosives that go to extreme temp without being nuclear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 11:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Probably. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 11:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I am from a "nuclear" family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 03:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Hydrogen (fusion) bomb involves no uranium or plutonium - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 06:10 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Fusion weapons use fission triggers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 06:48 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. not necessarily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 08:02 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Is there actually evidence for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 06:34 AM Response to Reply #24 |
47. It is possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 12:53 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Thanks, I am aware of ongoing fusion research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 03:03 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. such as? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-04-06 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
13. Ahh, the good old Plowshare Program. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
25. for reference: footage of normal controlled demolitions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 11:39 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. That still doesn't eliminate the impossibility of an atomic device. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 11:56 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Lack of uranium and plutonium helps reduce radiation, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 12:15 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. Only Difference Is That The WTC Went From The Top Down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 02:04 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Where on implosionworld do you see anything even remotely resembling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 12:43 AM Response to Reply #34 |
45. I Didn't Say Link Resembled WTC, I Said The Towers Went From Top Down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
38. I think DU management needs to provide a service |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-06-06 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
46. I don't recall this subject getting anywhere near the level of activity... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC