|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
chat_noir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:24 AM Original message |
MSNBC : Did planes really bring down the World Trade Center? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. :O |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Did Tucker think he could devote 2 minutes to this? You need at least 15. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
3. Amazing. Great paper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
4. have you ever seen the amount of work involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I disagree. After the attempted bombing of the towers in 1993 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. sorry...just doesn't work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Unless one has ties to the security company |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 04:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
107. Why would they want to destroy WTC 7? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KatieB (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:31 PM Response to Reply #107 |
133. Structural problems in the building were going to force them to destroy it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:58 AM Response to Reply #107 |
136. Because of what was inside? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:42 AM Response to Reply #6 |
20. Sorry--just doesn't work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 07:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
125. If you're looking for a conspiracy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
85. Refit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 10:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
143. The controlled collapse of WTC-7 [intentionally brought down] |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
83. Agree completely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mistertrickster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 05:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
116. Sorry, no. Buildings that big CAN'T topple over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 10:30 AM Response to Reply #116 |
144. Topple this: Evidence of Explosives In The Twin Tower Collapses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mistertrickster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 10:58 PM Response to Reply #144 |
146. Physicists, metallugists, engineers and architects have no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. "nearly IMPOSSIBLE to hide"--like the conspiracy to hoodwink the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
42. They could have worked at night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
84. sorry - very lame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrafingMoose (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 05:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
114. According to the official narrative about "these terrorists" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 07:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
140. delete, bad link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monkey see Monkey Do (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
7. No, this is a silly theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. that paper is crap, but that paper has ZERO to do with physics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
8. Absolute bullshit - the fires in Building 7 burned all day long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:21 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. "low probability of occurrence" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
87. FEMA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
26. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pauldp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:50 PM Response to Reply #26 |
135. thank you for making that point! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BamaBecky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
54. lol - nice try Steph |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prisoner_Number_Six (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
12. I saw a documentary on the structure of the towers that explains it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:31 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. A crane operator at the site told me exactly that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
74. "metal fatigue?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 09:54 PM Response to Reply #74 |
130. Not fatigue, but heat from the fire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
90. Quality of documentaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
14. On WTC7: Who you gonna believe? Me or your lying eyes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:39 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. That looks doctored not to mention the building doesn't collapse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:43 AM Response to Reply #17 |
22. If the video does not conform to the official conspiracy theory then ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mistertrickster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 05:40 PM Response to Reply #17 |
119. Yup. That's what I noticed too. The building is already falling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
16. Question: Didn't the tower that was hit second (lower) come down first? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:41 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. WTC7 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
80. There WAS significant damage to WTC7 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:56 PM Response to Reply #80 |
93. Nice picture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 03:05 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Not necessarily... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 03:16 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. Fireproofing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 03:33 PM Response to Reply #96 |
101. I am "suggesting"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 03:59 PM Response to Reply #101 |
104. What does "significant" mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:04 PM Response to Reply #93 |
131. A building is a system... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:34 AM Response to Reply #131 |
137. Corner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #80 |
106. Not significant compared to other buildings that did not collapse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marleyb (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 03:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
99. exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KurtNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #99 |
108. One more for you - the Empire State Building hit 7/28/1945 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mistertrickster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 05:41 PM Response to Reply #108 |
120. They don't build 'em like they used to. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 07:57 PM Response to Reply #120 |
127. Apples and Oranges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 05:08 PM Response to Reply #19 |
115. Accounts of heavy damage from on scene firefighters.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:53 PM Response to Reply #16 |
92. Column thickness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace_on_earth (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
18. Watch this video for evidence in support of his theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:43 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Utter BULLSHIT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:48 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. That's just not true ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:29 PM Response to Reply #25 |
72. Let's see the quote - in context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:50 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. I have a VCR recording off the air, live, from 9-11. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:28 PM Response to Reply #77 |
82. And yet you can't show it to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 04:33 PM Response to Reply #82 |
109. Dan Rather quote ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 04:38 PM Response to Reply #82 |
110. Some more from the lawsuit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 04:55 PM Response to Reply #110 |
113. Aaron Brown said it was "like a mushroom cloud explosion." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 07:30 PM Response to Reply #82 |
126. Please review my post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:54 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Go to the 9/11 Forum. They have transcripts from the firemen. Also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:55 AM Response to Reply #23 |
31. BULL-F**KINGSHIT!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:05 PM Response to Reply #31 |
44. I agree even if I wouldn't use your language ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:16 PM Response to Reply #44 |
53. LOL, thank you; my language was borrowed from the poster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:45 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. Agree with you totally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuesday_Morning (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:47 PM Response to Reply #44 |
75. Not to mention how much the bushistas ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
66. I do believe they LIHOP, at the very least |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 03:52 PM Response to Reply #66 |
102. LIHOP?!? That's a crazy bat-shit conspiracy theory! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
screembloodymurder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 03:21 PM Response to Reply #31 |
98. You'd have to be nuts to believe that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace_on_earth (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:56 AM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Have you watched the video? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:06 PM Response to Reply #23 |
45. Oral History of Firefighters and Rescue Workers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
48. Testimony from WTC HERO William Rodriquez! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:11 PM Response to Reply #48 |
65. that testimony says nothing about explosions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BamaBecky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:28 PM Response to Reply #23 |
56. You can argue all day with folks like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
73. I won't try to find it now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:49 PM Response to Reply #23 |
76. I found |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mistertrickster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 06:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
124. That would be consistent with one square acre of steel crashing down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thtwudbeme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
21. I have enjoyed reading the comments on DU everytime this article gets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:54 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. You're not convinced by the crane operator's summation? (snark) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:58 AM Response to Reply #29 |
36. Ain't that the truth! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:18 PM Response to Reply #29 |
69. Where do YOU live, Ms. Snark? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thtwudbeme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:09 PM Response to Reply #69 |
78. Stephanie, it's OK to disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:28 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. You do understand that 50,000 people worked in those towers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thtwudbeme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:50 PM Response to Reply #81 |
91. Yes, I do. And I also know that "recall" is flawed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 03:19 PM Response to Reply #91 |
97. did you look at the articles at the civil engineering site I linked above? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thtwudbeme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 08:01 PM Response to Reply #97 |
128. I am sorry...but, I doubt all "50,000" people were interviewed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
47. "read the reviews by his peers" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:14 PM Response to Reply #21 |
67. I've read the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
24. Very interesting,very... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
27. This wasn't submitted to an engineering or scientific journal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace_on_earth (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:56 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Actually BYU (Brigham Young Univ.) appears to be standing behind him...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:57 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Schools don't endorse everything their professors write. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace_on_earth (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. And his paper is sitting on BYU's server |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Doesn't mean they endorse it--just that he's allowed to use their webspace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace_on_earth (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:08 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Excerpt re: his discussion with sixty people at BYU... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:21 PM Response to Reply #46 |
70. he says. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:00 PM Response to Reply #27 |
37. Gee, maybe the other journals are afraid of retaliation from the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. That's what the Intelligent Design people say. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:17 PM Response to Reply #37 |
68. you mean Nature? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
30. This is complete rubbish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:04 PM Response to Reply #30 |
43. Fatuous: Unquestioningly swallowing the Official Story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
58. You defend one argument from incredulity with another? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
34. MSM or not, it's still bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:12 PM Response to Reply #34 |
51. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newportdadde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
38. The smoking man is behind it all! Coverup, Conspiracy I tell you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:08 PM Response to Reply #38 |
49. The administration LOVES people like you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 08:03 AM Response to Reply #49 |
141. Good post,, exactly...I hate those"tinfoil hat" remarks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:10 PM Response to Reply #38 |
50. Apply occam's razor to this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:15 PM Original message |
I think you hit the nail right on the head... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
71. The Mods see fit to exile this to the dark corners of DU and yet they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
screembloodymurder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 03:27 PM Response to Reply #71 |
100. I'm no longer contributing to the DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
52. The timing of the story also fits a pattern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace_on_earth (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
55. Let's all take a deep breath and understand the resistance to this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SittingBull (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:40 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Well said n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:50 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Excellent post! and Katrina showed us all what they "could" do ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 01:01 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Great minds think alike! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:58 PM Response to Reply #55 |
63. All anyone has to do is look to Katrina and the NOLA victims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #55 |
123. Well said. The professor also comments on this resistance in his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
61. Too bad this was moved to the "crazy conspiracy" forum. At least |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 12:57 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. The connection b/w AIPAC & the US is NO "conspiracy theory" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 04:55 PM Response to Reply #62 |
112. Yes, not only a major error in judgement, it's disheartening censorship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
79. The "Squibs" are Interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostexpectation (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:38 PM Response to Reply #79 |
86. heres goes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 04:48 PM Response to Reply #86 |
111. Hadn't Thought of That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
88. Whatever the facts are.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
89. What would be the motivation for destroying WTC 7? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kevin Fenton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #89 |
95. If you ask me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 03:56 PM Response to Reply #89 |
103. Enron, Bin laden, lot's of sick stuff ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 04:04 PM Response to Reply #89 |
105. Possible motives... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 05:43 AM Response to Reply #105 |
138. Silverstein's role |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 11:28 AM Response to Reply #138 |
145. Oh Silverstein has been fanatical about the insurance $$$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
117. Unanswered questions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
118. another thread on this Tucker Carson interview is here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
121. READ THE AFTERWARD IN THE PROF'S PAPER - good advice: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KatieB (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:28 PM Response to Reply #121 |
132. When I saw the buildings fall I said "That looks just like demolition work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
122. "Error: you can't recommend threads from this forum." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pauldp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 08:57 PM Response to Reply #122 |
129. So is DU censoring more tha MSNBC now? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corbett (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
134. Make Sure That These Folks Have Your Stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
139. Deleted message |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 08:06 AM Response to Reply #139 |
142. scary, huh? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackieO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-17-05 08:44 PM Response to Reply #142 |
147. Yeah, and I guess it's against the rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC