UPI Hears ( Former Bush Admin discuss collaspe of WTC

[candy331]

I wonder what the Wash Time is up to printing this, might be satire or fools gold for Dems.


By John Daly
UPI International Correspondent


Washington, DC, Jun. 13 (UPI) -- Insider notes from United Press International for June 8


A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling." Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."

--

Two years after President George W. Bush proclaimed "mission accomplished" in Iraq, some thoughtful officers are beginning to question who the insurgents actually are. In a recent interview the head of the US 42nd Infantry Division which covers key trouble spots, including Baquba and Samarra Major General Joseph Taluto said he could understand why some ordinary Iraqis would take up arms against U.S.

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm

[dweller]

1. what company(ies) were housed in Building 7?

?

dp

[candy331]

2. I don't know but perhaps someone can answer who may know.n/t

[dweller]

5. it was actually rhetorical.

FEMA's nonchalance about WTC-7’s collapse is stunning. Structural failures of this magnitude do not normally take place. In addition, there
was high-profile, large-budget government agencies leasing office space in WTC-7 that day. Besides the SEC, the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA), the Department of Defense (DOD), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and New York’s Office of Emergency Management
(OEM) were all tenants. None of the current heads of these departments have been vocal in demanding to know why this building collapsed.
In addition, while some details have been released, a full accounting of what data these agencies lost has not been prominently reported.

Another source of curiosity is what the NYC Office of Emergency Management (OEM) was doing prior to 9/11/01. We know that the OEM
took up the entire 23rd floor, serving as some sort of command center for then-Mayor Guiliani. Also, currently their website offers “Pet
Preparedness” tips. However, their activities at that time remain a source of widespread speculation.

With the two-year anniversary of the destruction of the World Trade Center arriving, the subject of WTC-7's odd disintegration is due some
scrutiny by the liberal US media. To name just one, does Z Magazine believe that we now live in an era when tall steel buildings can collapse
in large cities without any significant discussion of why? Even George Orwell might have trouble imagining that scenario.

http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LOU308A.html

more things that make you go "hmm" .

dp

[Mass]

3. Exact;y my thoughts.

They hope somebody is going to jump on that and that his way they will be able to discredit all questions about 9/11 and Iraq.

[Bolo Boffin]

4. Ah jeez...

...just set it down anywhere.