read the (
http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/spaceintro.pdf), submitted to the president january 11, 2001 ??
if ya ever wanted to stage a full scale attack against the united states, the best place to find out it's weaknesses is to head a commission to find out those weaknesses
look at page 16 (of 69) for its mandate:
The mandate is as follows:
“The Commission shall, concerning changes to be implemented over
the near-term, medium-term and long-term that would strengthen
United States national security, assess the following:
(1) The manner in which military space assets may be exploited to
provide support for United States military operations.
(2) The current interagency coordination process regarding the
operation of national security space assets, including
identification of interoperability and communications issues.
(3) The relationship between the intelligence and nonintelligence
aspects of national security space…and the potential costs and
benefits of a partial or complete merger of the programs,
projects, or activities that are differentiated by those two aspects.
(4) The manner in which....
look at page 23 for the executive summary:
An attack on elements of U.S. space systems during a crisis or conflict should not be considered an improbable act. If the U.S. is to avoid a “Space Pearl Harbor” it needs to take seriously the possibility of an attack on U.S.
(sound familiar ??)
some of the people on board this were:
William R. Graham, Jr, science adviser to president and & director,
Council on Foreign RelationsCharles A. Horner, former associate director, u.s. information agency,
Center for Security PolicyThomas S. Moorman, Jr., aerospace corporation, board of trustees,
Council for National PolicyGeneral Ronald R. Fogleman, us air rorce (Retired),
Council on Foreign Relationsand
Donald H. Rumsfeld, Project for the New American Century (Founding member)
Core Staff of the Commission:
Dr. Stephen A. Cambone, (he got promoted recently, didn't he ??)
look at page 36 for what the commission asked to have done:
Transform U.S. Military Capabilities
Strengthen Intelligence Capabilities
Shape the International Legal and Regulatory Environment
Advance U.S. Technological Leadership
Create and Sustain a Cadre of Space Professionals
(snip)
The current ASD (C3I) organization suffers from three difficulties:
• The span of control is so broad that only the most pressing issues are attended to and space matters are left, on a day-to-day basis, in the hands of middle-level officials without sufficient influence within the Department and the interagency arena.
• Its influence on the planning, programming and budgeting process for space is too far removed or too late to have substantial effect on
either the Services’ or the Intelligence Community’s processes.
• Within this structure it is not possible for senior officials outside DoD to identify a single, high-level individual who has the authority to represent the Department on space-related matters.
did we have (in may 2001 when cheney was supposedly put in charge of FEMA) a single, high-level individual who has the authority to represent the Department on those related matters ??